It’s unclear whether city will seek to revoke license of Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel in wake of felony convictions

photo by: Nick Krug/Journal-World File Photo

Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel watches a video presenting renderings of his proposed Rock Chalk Park during the City Commission meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013, at City Hall. Fritzel is standing trial in federal court in Topeka for alleged improper disposal of asbestos.

Updated story

Feb. 25 — City revokes license of Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel in wake of felony convictions, stops work on current project

City of Lawrence code allows a contractor license to be revoked if the contractor is convicted of a crime related to his or her work, but whether the city will pursue revocation of Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel’s license following his recent felony convictions remains undetermined.

Specifically, city code gives the building official authority to revoke a contractor license in the case of a severe violation, a habitual violator or when the licensee is convicted of a crime or assessed an administrative penalty related to the licensee’s work as a contractor. When asked whether the city was considering revoking Fritzel’s license in the wake of his recent convictions related to improper asbestos disposal, Building Official Barry Walthall said that he could not comment on the matter.

“I would say that could potentially be an ongoing matter that we don’t feel appropriate discussing at this moment in time,” Walthall said.

The code states that in making the determination, the building official or the Building Code of Appeals shall take into account the severity of the alleged violation and all other relevant mitigating and aggravating circumstances. If a contractor’s license is revoked, the contractor is not eligible to apply for or be issued a contractor license for five years, according to the code.

Fritzel was found to have knowingly violated the federal Clean Air Act and federal regulations related to asbestos disposal at the former Alvamar Country Club, now known as the Jayhawk Club. On July 30, 2019, a jury took about two hours to find Fritzel guilty on three counts related to the disposal of material containing asbestos, a hazardous material that has been linked to cancer, during remodeling work at Alvamar in 2016. Fritzel was found guilty of knowingly failing to notify environmental agencies prior to removing asbestos material, knowingly failing to wet asbestos before removing it from the construction site and knowingly failing to dispose of asbestos waste in leak-tight containers.

Fritzel is involved with multiple construction-related companies, including DFC Company of Lawrence. If a company were to lose its local license, it would not be able to do construction work that requires a permit within the city limits.

Speaking in general, Walthall said that if he found it appropriate to revoke a contractor license, the contractor would be sent a notice listing the alleged violations and penalties. He said a 14-day appeal period would follow, wherein the contractor could appeal the decision to the Building Code Board of Appeals. The board would hear the appeal as part of a public meeting.

If the city decides to pursue the revocation of Fritzel’s license, it would not be the first time penalties have been considered.

In 2018, the city filed a complaint with the board against DFC Company and recommended that the board temporarily suspend the company’s license because of the pending federal asbestos charges and repeated violations of the city’s contractor licensing regulations, as the Journal-World previously reported. At the time, Steve Six, an attorney representing Fritzel, told the board in part that it was not known whether any of the indictment allegations against Fritzel were true. Ultimately, the board voted unanimously not to suspend Fritzel’s license while the case was pending.

Fritzel was sentenced for the asbestos violations last week. On Thursday, Judge Holly Teeter sentenced Fritzel to three months in prison for each count, with the sentences to be served concurrently, and ordered him to pay a $55,000 fine. Teeter said she considered various factors when deciding the sentence, which was lower than the recommended 10-16 months, including an analysis conducted by a toxicologist at Fritzel’s request that indicated the asbestos exposure posed little risk.

In another felony case, related to the development of The Oread hotel, Fritzel was indicted on charges of scheming to collect more than $400,000 in fraudulent tax refunds from the City of Lawrence. That case was tentatively set to go to trial last month, but Fritzel pleaded guilty to the charges on Jan. 9. As part of the plea agreement, both parties agreed to recommend a sentence of 12 months and a day in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentencing in that case is scheduled for May 4.


Related story: Thomas Fritzel tax fraud case

● Jan. 9, 2020 — Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel pleads guilty to criminal conspiracy in Oread tax fraud case


More coverage: Thomas Fritzel asbestos trial, sentencing

● Feb. 20, 2020 — Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel sentenced to 3 months in prison for asbestos violations

● July 30, 2019 — Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel found guilty of improperly disposing of asbestos

● July 29, 2019 — Witness: Purchase contract for Alvamar says site did not contain asbestos, indemnified Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel

● July 26, 2019 — Witnesses say truckloads of debris were removed from Alvamar site after potential for asbestos was known

● July 25, 2019 — Witnesses say they tried to inform Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel and others about asbestos ahead of demolition

● July 24, 2019 — Contrasting stories emerge as trial begins against Lawrence developer Thomas Fritzel on asbestos charges


Timeline: City of Lawrence tax dispute with Thomas Fritzel, Oread hotel

● May 10, 2017 — Judge officially dismisses city’s lawsuit against The Oread in wake of settlement

● April 28, 2017 — All parties sign settlement in city’s lawsuit against Oread hotel

● April 19, 2017 — City leaders approve Oread hotel settlement that reduces incentives, removes Fritzel from management

● April 14, 2017 — Tentative settlement would reduce incentives to Oread hotel by millions, require Fritzel to resign management duties

● March 29, 2017 — Judge orders conclusion of mediation in Oread hotel lawsuit

● March 6, 2017 — After 10 hours of mediation and executive session, no public update in city’s lawsuit against The Oread hotel

● March 3, 2017 — City leaders to take part in second court-ordered mediation Monday for lawsuit against Oread hotel

● Feb. 22, 2017 — Mediation session does not resolve city’s suit against The Oread hotel; judge orders second session

● Jan. 20, 2017 — Judge orders mediation in city’s lawsuit against Oread hotel

● Dec. 9, 2016 — City’s lawsuit against Oread hotel moved to federal court

● Dec. 4, 2016 — City: Oread hotel developer admitted to much of alleged tax scheme

● Nov. 16, 2016 — Lawsuit against Oread group cites personal purchases, faked sales in alleged scheme to defraud city

● June 9, 2016 — Auditors continue to review Oread sales tax documents; timeline for resolution uncertain

● April 19, 2016 — After Oread kerfuffle, city suggests adding right to audit into future incentive deals

● April 6, 2016 — City awaiting findings from Oread sales tax documents; Fritzel sends letter to community

● March 15, 2016 — Oread developers agree to comply with city demands

● Feb. 22, 2016 — Developer-commissioned analysis: Oread Inn owes fraction of what city says

● Feb. 17, 2016 — Oread group willing to comply with some city demands, asks for meeting ‘immediately’

● Feb. 11, 2016 — Lawrence declares Oread Inn in default of redevelopment agreement; developer says city is in default

● Feb. 10, 2016 — Oread Wholesale submits report about city-ordered audit; record not released

● Jan. 22, 2016 — As deadline passes, city mum about next move on Oread hotel tax dispute; new questions about Oread tenants emerge

● Jan. 19, 2016 — Oread group again contests city’s demands, accuses city of violating state law

● Jan. 6, 2016 — City mum on action against Oread Inn, waiting on last deadline to comply with demands

● Dec. 31, 2015 — Oread group pays nearly $500,000 to city ‘under protest’

● Dec. 30, 2015 — City seeking more than money from Oread group as deadline nears

● Dec. 29, 2015 — Oread group has not yet responded to city letter demanding $500,000; city has discussed issue with law enforcement

● Dec. 16, 2015 — City seeks more than $500,000 from Oread group after audit finds possible violations of state sales tax law

● Dec. 16, 2015 — City overpaid Oread hotel’s development group, mayor says

● Nov. 22, 2015 — Lawrence hires firm to evaluate Oread tax district

COMMENTS

Welcome to the new LJWorld.com. Our old commenting system has been replaced with Facebook Comments. There is no longer a separate username and password login step. If you are already signed into Facebook within your browser, you will be able to comment. If you do not have a Facebook account and do not wish to create one, you will not be able to comment on stories.