Lawrence police can apply for no-knock warrants but don’t, spokesperson says

Plus answers to questions about warrant execution, body cameras and more

photo by: August Rudisell/Contributed Photo

Protesters make their way down Massachusetts Street during a march against police brutality on May 31, 2020.

Across the country for several months, protesters have rallied behind a common refrain: “Arrest the cops who killed Breonna Taylor.”

Taylor, a 26-year-old Louisville, Ky., emergency medical worker, was shot several times when plainclothes officers executed a search warrant at her apartment on March 13. Her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, is accused of shooting a police officer as the police entered because he thought they were being robbed, though prosecutors dropped an attempted murder charge they had filed against him.

After a grand jury did not indict any officers in connection with Taylor’s death and instead just charged one with wanton endangerment for allegedly shooting into the occupied apartment next door, more information about the case has been released to the public.

The Journal-World has received questions from readers about some of the issues at play in Taylor’s death and other police shootings — namely, how does the Lawrence Police Department handle these kinds of situations?

Lt. David Ernst, of LPD’s Public Affairs Unit, answered some of those questions via email last week.

No-knock warrants?

The Louisville Metro Police Department officers had obtained a “no-knock” warrant, signed by a judge, to enter Taylor’s apartment, meaning they didn’t have to announce themselves before making entry. After the no-knock warrant was issued, the terms were changed to knock-and-announce. The officers, who used a battering ram to gain entry, have said that they did announce themselves. Walker and some neighbors who were interviewed said they did not hear them. There is no body-camera footage of the incident.

No-knock warrants allow officers to surprise suspects to prevent destruction of narcotics; however, particularly since Taylor’s death, such warrants have come under scrutiny, and the city of Louisville has now banned them.

A New York Times investigation in 2017 found that “at least 81 civilians and 13 law enforcement officers died in such raids from 2010 through 2016. Scores of others were maimed or wounded.”

Officers with the Lawrence Police Department have the ability to apply to a judge for such warrants, Ernst said. However, he said that he had spoken with several department members and can’t recall any uses of no-knock warrants by the department in at least the last 10 years.

“We recognize the safety hazards presented by these types of warrants for the suspects, the officers and the community,” Ernst wrote. “We choose to employ alternate, safer forms of entry or apprehension.”

Oregon and Florida are the only states that have outlawed no-knock warrants, according to the AP.

Louisville police found no drugs in their search of Taylor’s apartment, the AP has reported.

Body cam footage?

In a separate Louisville incident, officers shot and killed a barbecue cook, David McAtee, on June 1. The officers who were involved failed to activate their body cameras, and the police chief was fired as a result of the “institutional failure,” The Associated Press reported.

LPD rolled out body-worn camera systems departmentwide in January, but that doesn’t necessarily mean there would be footage for every incident.

LPD’s body cameras automatically activate at the sound of a gunshot, and they have a 30-second “look back” period. That means that barring technical issues with a camera, if a shooting were to occur, footage would be available for the 30 seconds preceding it.

LPD policy states that officers are not expected to jeopardize their own safety to activate their body cameras. Asked what safety concerns could make it impossible to turn on the cameras, Ernst said it would be difficult to identify every possible scenario, but “for instance, when an officer is not on a call for service and is unexpectedly presented with a situation that requires them to immediately react.”

He did not directly answer when asked why, if there could be a safety concern in turning the cameras on and off, they aren’t on at all times, but he said it is department policy to continuously record until the officer believes the incident is complete “or the situation no longer fits the criteria for activation.”

The Drug Enforcement Unit includes officers with the Lawrence Police Department as well as the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office. Ernst said that members of the DEU who are LPD officers — including plainclothes officers — are issued body-worn camera systems.

Ernst said any officers present or assisting with the execution of a warrant would be required to activate their body cameras, and that warrants are commonly served by officers, detectives and members of the DEU. One exception in the department’s policy is that officers are prohibited from recording encounters with undercover officers or known informants.

Most of LPD’s unmarked cars do not have in-car camera systems, Ernst said, which are primarily installed in patrol vehicles.

“Generally, when personnel in unmarked vehicles intend to stop a vehicle or conduct a search warrant a police officer in full uniform and a fully marked patrol vehicle is summoned to assist,” Ernst said.

Conflicting reports?

In Taylor’s case, audio that was presented to the grand jury and later released publicly revealed conflicting accounts of what had occurred — specifically regarding whether the officers had identified themselves before breaking down the apartment door.

In other incidents nationwide over the summer, video footage disproved officers’ accounts of incidents in which they injured protesters. Oftentimes, in incidents that occur in very public settings such as protests, footage may be released almost instantaneously online; in others, such as the execution of a search warrant, there might not be members of the public around to capture the moment, which then leaves the question of video footage up to the police.

Whether body camera or dashcam footage is released may depend on department policy and state law. For instance, Kansas law enacted through July 1, 2021, states that any recording from a body camera or vehicle camera is considered a “criminal investigation record,” and therefore is an exception to the Kansas Open Records Act that is not required to be disclosed. However, people who are subjects of the recordings, legal guardians of minors in recordings, an heir at law to a decedent who is the subject of the recording, or their attorney may view or listen to recordings upon a request to the law enforcement agency.

Ernst said that audio/video recordings might not capture an entire incident or interaction, but “the presence of audio and video recordings are equally important to the public and the officers.”

“We believe this compact, reliable tool helps our officers record observations, document police interactions, and aid in criminal prosecution,” Ernst said. “Our body-worn camera program is another aspect of our professional policing strategies that add a layer of safety and accountability.”

What happens when recordings aren’t available and officers have different accounts of an incident?

Ernst said that LPD’s officers document their actions and perceptions of how an event occurred in their written reports. He said it is not uncommon for officers to have a slightly different perception of an incident based on their relative positions, what they were focused on and what they heard.

“This is also common when obtaining statements from witnesses, victims etc.,” he said. “These varied perceptions are expected. We do not want our officers colluding and making certain their reports are identical.”

Which officers write reports about incidents varies, depending on the circumstances, Ernst said.

“When multiple officers encounter the same situation, each officer will complete their own report providing their own perspective of the incident,” Ernst said.

Typically, he said, officers will have a role or roles in investigations — interviewing a suspect, collecting evidence, interviewing witnesses and so on — and they’ll report their own actions or findings.

Interim Chief Anthony Brixius told the Journal-World recently that officers found to have been untruthful resign from their positions or are terminated.

— The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Contact Mackenzie Clark

Have a story idea, news or information to share? Contact public safety reporter Mackenzie Clark:

Related coverage

Oct. 4, 2020: Questions emerge about whether defendants in Douglas County cases have been getting ‘the whole truth’

Oct. 1, 2020: Community Police Review Board voices concerns about how Lawrence police screen and track complaints

Aug. 27, 2020: Community Police Review Board debates whether board should expand scope beyond race and other bias complaints

Aug. 13, 2020: Community Police Review Board begins drafting changes that would increase review powers

Aug. 17, 2020: Recording raises question of perjury by Lawrence police officer; LPD says probe cleared him

Aug. 1, 2020: City pursues outside study to inform ‘transformation’ of Lawrence police department

July 22, 2020: Lawrence City Commission approves police union contract that includes changes to complaint procedures, pay raises for officers and detectives

July 7, 2020: Lawrence City Commission commits to review and reform of police use-of-force policies

July 6, 2020: Lawrence police union told former chief of staffing concerns, poor morale months before vote of no confidence, records show

June 29, 2020: Amid pandemic, city and police union to propose extension of police union contract with ‘minor changes’

June 28, 2020: ‘What’s your badge number?’ Lawrence police technically don’t have them, but they should provide their names upon request

June 24, 2020: Lawrence police: Most calls for law enforcement are being dispatched without addresses because of civilians responding

June 23, 2020: Community Police Review Board members say board is just a ‘rubber stamp’ for police, call for more review powers

June 17, 2020: Lawrence Police Department has updated policies on use of force, comparisons to ‘8 Can’t Wait’

June 15, 2020: A rundown of how Lawrence police can and cannot use their body cameras and how the public can record police interactions

June 14, 2020: City leaders want a stronger police review board, more transparency on complaints against officers

June 10, 2020: Lawrence Police Department finally releases report on use of force in 2019; 17 instances cited; officers’ actions found justified in all

June 9, 2020: Lawrence mayor calls for city to reallocate some police funding for social services

June 1, 2020: City leaders concerned over missing yearly reports from police; county leaders content with alternatives to sheriff’s reports

May 31, 2020: Lawrence Police Department’s staffing near 10-year low; turnover is up and sworn experience is down

May 28, 2020: Questions loom over $100K+ payment to outgoing Lawrence police chief, restrictions on speech

May 18, 2020: Lawrence police chief resigning to pursue ‘other opportunities’; separation agreement includes $106K payment

May 17, 2020: Where are the reports? Lawrence police, Douglas County Sheriff’s Office explain the absence of documents about their performance

March 5, 2020: City manager says direction, communication are missing from Lawrence Police Department

Feb. 26, 2020: Lawrence police union takes vote of no confidence in chief, records show

Nov. 12, 2019: Lawrence City Commission approves spending additional $1M on $18.5M police headquarters

May 9, 2018: Staffing study finds Lawrence police short on patrol officers


Welcome to the new Our old commenting system has been replaced with Facebook Comments. There is no longer a separate username and password login step. If you are already signed into Facebook within your browser, you will be able to comment. If you do not have a Facebook account and do not wish to create one, you will not be able to comment on stories.