Advertisement

Archive for Thursday, January 17, 2008

Shoppers hesitant about clones

FDA ruling spawns consumer questions, concerns

January 17, 2008

Advertisement

Priscilla, a cloned calf, left, is with her surrogate mother in a pasture near Austin, Texas, in this 2005 file photo. This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said meat and milk from cloned animals is as safe as that from their counterparts bred the old-fashioned way.

Priscilla, a cloned calf, left, is with her surrogate mother in a pasture near Austin, Texas, in this 2005 file photo. This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said meat and milk from cloned animals is as safe as that from their counterparts bred the old-fashioned way.

Approving meat products for human consumption is one thing.

Convincing shoppers and retailers to buy into the idea is quite another.

"I don't know that I would purchase it until we have years of proof and testing that shows it's safe," said Lawrence shopper Ruth Townsend, a day after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration declared beef and dairy products safe to eat and drink. "It's probably OK, but I'd be leery of trying it."

The FDA's ruling lifts barriers to offspring produced from cloned cows, goats or swine from eventually becoming regular meal items.

And that has some Lawrence residents anxious, especially because food produced from cloned offspring could land on shelves and into shopping bags without consumers even knowing. That's because the FDA isn't requiring such products to be stamped with special labels.

Theresa Smith, for one, wants to know if her food comes from a cloned animal or its offspring. The FDA sometimes approves things prematurely, Smith said.

"Just because they say it's good doesn't mean it's not going to turn out to be bad later," Smith said. "If I had my way, I'd let other people eat it first before I did. I'm kind of like that. When everyone ran to get a microwave, I waited. And when everyone ran to get a cell phone, I waited.

"I'd like to wait to see what happens before I try cloned food, and I should have that option."

Citing marketing concerns, the FDA has asked stores to abide by an optional moratorium. Chris Friesleben, spokeswoman for Hy-Vee stores, said the Iowa-based chain - which has two stores in Lawrence - plans to uphold the voluntary ban.

The FDA and retailers are suggesting, but not requiring, that suppliers notify stores if products come from cloned animals, Friesleben said.

"The FDA's position is that the food produced from cattle, pigs and goats is safe, but (the FDA) is still asking the industry to put a voluntary ban on putting cloned food into the food chain," Friesleben said. "It's our position to support the FDA's recommendation and food manufacturers should abide by that voluntary ban, and let us know about any food (from cloned animals) slipping into the food chain. So far we have not been notified."

Other stores are taking the same stance.

"Our approach is based on customer preference, and it's our understanding that consumers want more information on this issue," said Sheila Lowrie, spokeswoman for Dillons.

Most cloned animals are not going to be used for food, but to be used for breeding - so that prime animals can be replicated, giving producers the ability to get more top-quality offspring.

Aaron Atscison doesn't plan on eating anything from a cloned animal - he's a vegetarian - and considers the FDA's approval a step in the wrong direction.

"I think it screws up our ecosystem, and we really don't know what we're doing," Atscison said. "I think it's unnatural and even unnecessary."

- Journal-World intern Chansi Long can be reached at 832-7261.

Comments

LJWorld.com doesn’t necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

  1. mhb (anonymous) says…

    So how many people actually trust the FDA? Do you think they really have the best interests of the public health as their top priority? Just curious...

  2. number3of5 (anonymous) says…

    I don't see how people can complain about cloned meats, since they have been eating vegetables for years that are grown for certain traits. All hybrid vegetables are altered to produce bigger and better. Even our wheat strains of today are altered from their original states. Grow up people, realize what you are already eating and drinking.

  3. merrill (anonymous) says…

    How does the FDA know...not this one! What about the food goods being flown in from abroad...China and elsewhere?

    Buy organic!

    Or know your local producer very well. There some local not organic producers that will use hormones,antibiotics etc etc. and some that will not.

    There are meat substitutes such as tofu,tempeh,wheat meatand Seitan that can be used in stir fry,baked,grilled,used in chili etc etc. Plenty of receipes available online and tons of cookbooks. Tofu Cookery by Louise Hagler is good. Central Soy tofu and Tempeh is local and organic.

  4. canyon_wren (anonymous) says…

    I probably don't have a problem with meat from cloned animals, but will avoid it if possible. I certainly don't trust the FDA! I don't understand WHY animals have to be cloned. It is not like we have a shortage, or anything. Undoubtedly, it is cheaper and of course that is the motive for most everything that is newly tried. I agree with Merrill's suggestions and I think more and more people are following that path. We mustn't let the government and the "big guys" rule our lives! They absolutely do not have our best interests at heart!