Archive for Monday, August 22, 2005
Future of water supply murky
State lakes filling with sediment as they get older, hurting quality
August 22, 2005
Advertisement
Topeka Kansas lakes aren't aging gracefully.
Many of the reservoirs in the state used for drinking water are filling up with sediment, which reduces their capacity and can harm the quality of the water.
"This is potentially a huge problem that is going to confront the state in the next 20 to 40 years," said Edward Martinko, director of the Kansas Biological Survey.
There are 93 reservoirs in Kansas used for drinking water for approximately 60 percent of the state's population.
Those lakes are an average of 51 years old.
Big lakes - such as John Redmond Reservoir, Perry, Tuttle Creek and Cheney - have lost anywhere from 23 percent to 30 percent of their capacity to hold water.
Clinton Lake's storage capacity has only decreased by six percent due to sedimentation, but even that figure is greater than was originally projected, Martinko said.
David Brewer, a water quality technician, gathers a water sample from one of the city's water treatment plants.
"The bottom line is that the situation with respect to Clinton is that it has been sedimenting in faster than has been anticipated. The original life expectancy was 100 years, and now it is projected at only 70 years," Martinko said.
Many smaller lakes have lost 50 percent. Mission Lake near Horton has silted in so much it can't be used anymore as a public water supply.
"This is not a sleeping giant anymore," said Horton Mayor Dale White.
The Kansas Water Office is seeking legislative permission to use $400,000 to conduct a pilot project to determine how these lakes can be rehabilitated.
Tracy Streeter, executive director of the Water Office, said the upkeep of lakes is necessary "just like we fix old streets and sewer lines."
- Silt threatens drinking water (06-23-05)
- Strategy developed to extend life of lake (01-09-05)
- Group fears for future of safe drinking water (10-10-03)
- Dredging up business (08-31-03)
- Perry Lake disappearing (04-23-03)
- Engineers say Tuttle Creek Reservoir will become giant mud flat by 2076 (05-22-01)
- Activist's water report makes waves (03-03-01)
- Official urges control of soil erosion (04-19-92)
- Kansas Water Office
Martinko said lakes experience a life cycle where sediment from runoff accumulates in the lake bed. This increases the nutrient level in the water leading to more algae blooms, taste and odor problems in drinking water and will limit recreational uses. The sediment deposit also reduces the water supply yield of the lake.
The state needs to act now because the potential cost of rehabilitating lakes is staggering, he said.
For example, he said, it is estimated that nearly 3 million cubic yards of silt fills in Lake Perry every year. Dredging typically costs about $5 per cubic year, bringing the annual bill at Perry to about $15 million per year just to keep up.
"It's important for us to start doing pilot project studies to deal with some of these issues and look for the most cost-effective method," Martinko said.
In Horton, residents are having to rely on wells because of problems with their lake. They have approved a $4 million bond issue that would double their water bills in order to dredge the lake that was built in the 1930s.
White, the Horton mayor, said he hopes to partner with the state to be part of the pilot project.
Rep. Tom Sloan, R-Lawrence, has been at the forefront in the Legislature for trying to address the issue.
"The quantity and quality of water available 100 years from now for the people of Kansas depends on actions we take now to preserve our drinking water supply lakes," Sloan said.
"Reducing the rate of siltation is important, but so is addressing the sediment already present in the lakes. The sediment affects water storage capacity, water quality, and flood control and recreation opportunities," he added.
Sloan spearheaded legislation that takes effect in two years that essentially will move fees paid by water suppliers from the state's general fund to the state water fund, which can be used on projects such as dredging lakes.
But until that money starts kicking in, state water officials are asking to use some existing water funds to do the pilot project.
Martinko said there is no time to waste.
"Fifty years ago, people thought ahead to build these lakes, now we have to do something to keep them up," he said.
More like this
- Mapping gets to bottom of state's shrinking lakes 17 comments / December 17, 2006
- Lawmakers protest releases from reservoirs 19 comments / February 22, 2007
- Drink stink 29 comments / December 12, 2006
- Clinton Lake plan meets disapproval 22 comments / August 17, 2006
- Upstream sediment filling in reservoir 6 comments / April 29, 2007
Top ads RSS
- PRODUCTION SHIRT PRESSER needed. Start at 7AM. 5 1/2 day ...
- KU Center for Educational
- Dining Services Supervisor Must be a CERTIFIED DIETARY MANAGER Hospitality ...
- ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Fundraising and public relations firm seeking full-time administrative ...
- HOLIDAY RUSH $400/$600 week. 30 openings available in various departments ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Mangino's contract outlines probe November 21, 2009 · 65 comments
- Nation has right to ask ‘why?’ November 21, 2009 · 37 comments
- Blog: Why Do People Repeat Falsehoods? November 20, 2009 · 57 comments
- No line at H1N1 immunization clinic November 21, 2009 · 8 comments
- Blog: Palin Book Could Be Your Cheapest Source For Winter Fuel November 20, 2009 · 77 comments
- Nothing to lose: Reeling KU huge underdog for a change November 21, 2009 · 22 comments
- Blog: We Noticed November 19, 2009 · 124 comments
- Blog: Top Tens Reasons The Oprah Show Is Like Boil. November 21, 2009 · 3 comments
- Mangino denies validity of former player allegations November 19, 2009 · 158 comments
- Blog: Curried Green Splits: Smelling Mighty Good! November 16, 2009 · 14 comments
- Mangino's contract outlines probe November 21, 2009
- Four decades in crisis mode November 21, 2009
- On target November 21, 2009
- Lawrence couple excel in triathlons November 21, 2009
- A sad story November 19, 2009
- Obesity activist crossing country to urge American Indians to embrace healthier diet November 20, 2009
- Sexual healing: Dennis Dailey coaches couples with tough love at his intimacy workshop November 20, 2009
- Health and stress affect grades November 10, 2008
- Meier mature, classy November 21, 2009
- Chiefs honor ex-left offensive tackle Roaf December 15, 2008


22 August 2005
at 9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sandrat (Anonymous) says…
Why can't they dredge the lakes like they dredge the Kaw? Seems like you could kill two birds that way.
22 August 2005
at 9:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sandrat (Anonymous) says…
My post meant to say 'Why can't they dredge the lakes instead of the Kaw.' I'm sure it has something to do with the lake being the property of the Corps of Engineers or the State Park Service, but you'd think they could use money too.
22 August 2005
at 11:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BunE (Anonymous) says…
They can dredge the lake, but they won't get the same results. The Kaw is a sandy river bottom and they use the sand to make concrete. The reason they dredge Kaw for sand is that it is a few cents cheaper per ton to extract.
At least in the short term. In the long term, they release the pollutants that the sand had filtered, allow the earth from the sides of the river to tumble into the river and increase erosion, and just really make a mess.
Not to mention all of the urbn sprawl we call “progress”
destroy the river dredgers!
22 August 2005
at 4:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
spikey_mcmarbles (Anonymous) says…
When river banks fall into the river, it's because the channel is right next to the bank. Proper river dredging creates's a channel down the middle, thus increasing the speed of water in the channel, and decreasing the speed of water next to the bank. Slow water near bank = less bank erosion