Archive for Monday, September 8, 2008
Jury to continue deliberations in U.S. Highway 59 fatalities
Jurors hearing the second degree murder trial of Ramona Morgan deliberate more than four hours on Monday but have yet to reach a verdict.
September 8, 2008
Advertisement
Ramona Morgan talks with her attorney, Billy Rork, Monday in Douglas County District Court. Behind them is a photograph of the truck that police say Morgan was driving when two U.S. Highway 59 workers were struck and killed on Sept. 11, 2007.
Jurors will return to Douglas County District Court Tuesday morning to deliberate the fate of a Washington state woman accused of killing two highway workers in 2007 in a hit-and-run.
During closing arguments Monday, a prosecutor accused Ramona I. Morgan, 49, of "showing extreme indifference to the value of human life" by her actions on Sept. 11, 2007 - a key legal phrase for the highest charge she faces.
"She accelerated 51 mph into a group of men on foot. She showed extreme and absolute indifference to the value of human life," said David Melton, a chief assistant Douglas County district attorney.
But Morgan's defense attorney, Billy Rork, told jurors that prosecutors failed to meet the burden of proof and that his client, scared for her life, thought she was being chased when she drove through the construction zone.
"Ramona Morgan's state of mind is the key - not yours, not mine," Rork said.
Prosecutors are trying to convict Morgan of two counts of reckless second-degree murder for striking and killing construction workers Tyrone Korte, 30, an inspector for the Kansas Department of Transportation from Seneca, and Rolland Griffith, 24, a construction worker for Dustrol Inc. from El Dorado, on U.S. Highway 59 near Pleasant Grove. She also faces an aggravated battery charge for injuring a third worker, Curtis Delzell, a Dustrol Inc. construction worker.
Jurors have the option of convicting Morgan of lesser charges: involuntary manslaughter or vehicular homicide, which is a misdemeanor.
Melton attacked Morgan's defense claim that she believed people were chasing her for two days across Missouri and Kansas and shooting at her truck to try to rob her.
He also stressed testimony from workers and construction zone drivers who said Morgan and her daughter, Sabrina Morgan, 27, were laughing the first time they drove north through the construction zone and caused a line of southbound cars following a pilot vehicle to pull off the road.
But Rork said eyewitness testimony at the trial was inconsistent from interviews with law enforcement shortly after the hit-and-run. He also emphasized that the damage to the truck's windshield could have impeded her view; Rork has said Morgan thought she struck only orange barrels.
Throughout Monday afternoon, the 12-person jury had a court reporter read back testimony several times. When the trial resumes at 9 a.m. Tuesday in District Judge Paula Martin's courtroom, jurors will listen to a reading of part of the testimony of Morgan, who testified in her defense Friday.
More like this
- Jury heads home in hit-and-run case 13 comments / September 8, 2008
- Attorney seeks dismissal of murder verdicts, new trial for Ramona Morgan in hit-and-run case 10 comments / October 14, 2008
- Jurors in U.S. Highway 59 murder trial have questions for court 16 comments / September 9, 2008
- KBI, coroner, defendant testify in hit-and-run trial 22 comments / September 5, 2008
- Jury finds Ramona Morgan guilty on all charges relating to last September's accident 69 comments / September 9, 2008
Top ads RSS
- Tax Prep Help Wanted Full-time, Temporary Position for the 2009 ...
- Cleaning Technician- 5 eves. per wk, 3 hrs per night; ...
- Floor Tech/Floater Sun.-Thurs., 2-4 hrs. per night, start at 5:00 ...
- Now Hiring Experienced Sales People $9/hour + commission + bonus ...
- Research Assistant KU Requires bachelor's degree in biochemistry, chemistry, molecular ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Quiet revolution taking place in America November 25, 2009 · 117 comments
- School district may have to tap contingency fund November 24, 2009 · 46 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 51 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 75 comments
- Blog: No Worries, Apparently A Lot Of Kids Are That Way. November 25, 2009 · 2 comments
- Lawrence likely to land distribution center November 24, 2009 · 19 comments
- Dropping home values may not accurately reflect market November 25, 2009 · 37 comments
- Lambert performance causes stir November 25, 2009 · 41 comments
- On the street: Is Thanksgiving your favorite holiday? November 25, 2009 · 44 comments
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009 · 38 comments
- Former KU Chancellor Laurence Chalmers dies November 25, 2009
- Research: Giving thanks brings health, happiness November 25, 2009
- KU says student didn't follow proper lab procedures before exposure to toxic chemical November 25, 2009
- City gives signal for traffic lights November 25, 2009
- Message warns students at Perry-Lecompton not to attend class today April 20, 2007
- Warm up for holiday cheer with screening of 'Thankskilling' November 24, 2009
- Kansas ranks 24th in nation when it comes to health November 24, 2009
- Former OU basketball coach Billy Tubbs to speak at Lawrence Chamber of Commerce meeting November 24, 2009
- Haskell freshman dies in Montana jail November 24, 2009
- Hillcrest students win prize for fitness video November 20, 2009


8 September 2008
at 10:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OldEnuf2BYurDad (Anonymous) says…
“she believed people were chasing her for two days across Missouri and Kansas and shooting at her truck to try to rob her”In that two day period I'm sure she stopped to eat, sleep, relieve herself… but never took the opportunity to call 911 to report that she was being attacked? Two days of being pursued, but she never called the cops. Not believable. I think “something” was going on - drug deal gone bad, mental illness, something. She needs (needed) to just come clean and say “I did it because I'm nuts/I was running from my pimp/etc.” rather than this “one armed man” defense.
8 September 2008
at 11:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
weloverollandgene (Anonymous) says…
We hope the jurors are smart enough to see through her lies she is making up a story and all evidence points to her gilt come on jury wake up!!!!!!!!!
9 September 2008
at 7:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
stuckinthemiddle (Anonymous) says…
OldEnuf2BYurDadI believe that Morgan did make and 911 call the day before and claimed she was being chased… on the channel 6 news they said that the jurors had requested to re-listen to the recording of that call…
9 September 2008
at 7:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
weloverollandgene (Anonymous) says…
Lawrence lets make sure justice is done.She got away with it in Washington at least in Washington she didn't take any human lives when she had road rage. May we show her that a new start around our area does not mean you can murder the anyone you want. Then just makeup a story because the law will not do what you want. In Kansas you took lives, let us pray that the jurors see the light. If the jurors go off of evidence and not here say including Morgans it would be open and shut. What proof do we have she was being chased,base it off of physical evidence only!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9 September 2008
at 8:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jayhawker2008 (Anonymous) says…
What's to deliberate? She ran through the construction zone once, only to turn around and kill 2 people on her way back. She's crazy and needs to be put in jail!
9 September 2008
at 8:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KansasPerson (Anonymous) says…
Even if she truly thought she was being chased (and that's a big if), was she really so out of it to think that all the construction people were somehow “in on it”??How out of it would she have to be to not even NOTICE that she had struck people with her vehicle?Her story has sounded like baloney from the start. I agree with a previous poster (different article) that she's had quite a bit of jail-time to think up this lame defense. And I'm not sympathetic to the “mental illness” angle in this case.And I'm still puzzled on the whole issue with the daughter. Did she also think they were being chased? Could she not talk her mom down from her reckless behavior? (I can't remember if the daughter is being charged too.)My prayers are with the family and friends. The pain you must be feeling is not even imaginable to me.
9 September 2008
at 8:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Informed (Anonymous) says…
Anything less than 'guilty' to the highest charge is a travesty of justice.That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.My sincere condolences to the families of those who died. I am sorry that you are having to relive such painful memories.
9 September 2008
at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
manus_flexibilis (Anonymous) says…
This sounds all methed up!
9 September 2008
at 10:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
4thgencowgirl (Anonymous) says…
Manus, I have to agree with you. I think they both were. Again, condolences to the family.