Archive for Saturday, July 29, 2006
Ruling favors professor in tenure dispute at KU
July 29, 2006
Advertisement
A judge has denied Kansas University's request for dismissal of a lawsuit by a professor who says he didn't get tenure because his colleagues disliked his Republican politics.
KU attorneys argued that Jeffrey Olafsen's suit, filed early this year in District Court, should be thrown out because it wasn't filed on time.
They argued that when Olafsen received a letter in March 2005 denying him tenure, it was a "final agency action" and that he had only 30 days in which to file a lawsuit.
But Olafsen argued KU's final action didn't come until late 2005, when he lost his appeal to a campuswide tenure committee. He filed the suit shortly afterward.
In a ruling this week, Judge Jack Murphy agreed with Olafsen. He wrote that just because KU called the March 2005 letter a final action "does not necessarily make it so."
Olafsen, an assistant professor of physics and astronomy, claims while his tenure was being considered, the department head suggested Olafsen was to blame for research funding cuts because of his support for President Bush. No trial date has been set.
More like this
- Republican political views played role in denial of tenure, lawsuit alleges 119 comments / April 26, 2006
- KU prof withdraws request to dismiss suit December 6, 2000
- Appeal denied in lawsuit against pharmacy program 4 comments / August 29, 2007
- KU ATTEMPTS TO FIRE TENURED PROFESSOR October 12, 1989
- Former professor wins suit against KU April 12, 2000
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Extraordinarily grateful November 26, 2009 · 1 comment
- Woodlawn a finalist for Blue Ribbon Award November 24, 2009 · 4 comments
- Quiet revolution taking place in America November 25, 2009 · 118 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 59 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 75 comments
- Munchers to honor owner at open house November 26, 2009 · 1 comment
- Lambert performance causes stir November 25, 2009 · 41 comments
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009 · 39 comments
- On the street: Is Thanksgiving your favorite holiday? November 25, 2009 · 44 comments
- Blog: Tasering Your Preteen: Can You Imagine? November 24, 2009 · 68 comments
- Former KU Chancellor Laurence Chalmers dies November 25, 2009
- Message warns students at Perry-Lecompton not to attend class today April 20, 2007
- Pale veggies pack plenty of nutrition December 17, 2008
- KU says student didn't follow proper lab procedures before exposure to toxic chemical November 25, 2009
- School district may have to tap contingency fund November 24, 2009
- Lawrence likely to land distribution center November 24, 2009
- Keenly attuned blind couple have different way of ‘looking at’ things October 12, 2009
- 6News video: SLT opponents gather for forum June 15, 2008
- Kansas ranks 24th in nation when it comes to health November 24, 2009
29 July 2006
at 3:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
!!!
29 July 2006
at 9:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
yourworstnightmare (Anonymous) says…
Denial of tenure sucks, and I can understand Dr. (Jeff) Olafsen's anger.
However, the fact remains that Dr. Linda Olafsen, the wife of the denied, was granted tenure in the same department in the same year.
29 July 2006
at 10:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jayhawks71 (Anonymous) says…
But if the department head made that comment, the department head should face sanctioning and removal from that position. I know nothing else about Olafsen's denial of tenure, but IF his claim is true regarding the department head's statement, he will have a leg to stand on. And if true, the department head is a moron.
29 July 2006
at 10:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
If the statement from the head of the department was factual, then it'll have little impact on Olafsen's suit, unless he can show that it prevented a fair assessment of whether or not he deserved tenure. For the matter, even if it wasn't factual, he'll need to show that it influenced the decision.
Regardless, if the evidence shows he deserves tenure, he should get tenure.
29 July 2006
at 10:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Wilbur_Nether (Anonymous) says…
There is more detail regarding Dr. Olafsen's position at http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/apr…. We know very few of the facts in this case. But I'm pretty sure that there is no law against being a moron. And if there is, let me know where to turn myself in, because I've done plenty of moronic things in my life.