Advertisement

Archive for Thursday, July 20, 2006

Research advocates vow to fight on

July 20, 2006

Advertisement

Shirley Pozdro, of Lawrence, just happened to turn on the television Wednesday to see President Bush announce that he vetoed legislation that would have increased embryonic stem cell research.

While Bush surrounded himself with supporters of his veto, Pozdro was not applauding.

"I respect and understand his position, but for those of us having a hard time - quality of life is for all life," said Pozdro, who at 73 has suffered with Parkinson's disease for the past 16 years.

Supporters of more research vowed to keep fighting, saying the research holds the promise of finding cures for deadly and debilitating diseases.

Lori Hutfles, executive director of the Kansas Center for Lifesaving Cures, said the veto was expected.

"The reality is, this research is going forward," Hutfles said. "When there is a new Congress and a new president, this will be back."

But not if Kansas' senators have anything to say about it. On Tuesday, U.S. Sens. Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts, both Republicans, voted against the measure.

Audio Clips
Sen. Brownback stem cell issue

Sounding the same criticisms as Bush, Brownback said embryonic stem cell research was immoral because it requires the destruction of human embryos to extract the stem cells. He also said it was unnecessary, citing the success of adult stem cells and umbilical cord stem cell research.

"The federal government should not use public funds for unethical embryonic stem cell research in light of the fact that adult and cord blood stem cell research has yielded 72 peer-reviewed treatments for conditions ranging from spinal injuries to leukemia," Brownback said.

Backers of the legislation, however, argued that stem cells from embryos hold more medical potential.

Roberts issued a one-sentence statement, saying, "I do not support expanded federal funding of embryonic stem cell research because of the ongoing ethical concerns expressed by many taxpayers with such research."

Although the legislation to expand federal funding of embryonic stem cell research was approved by hefty margins in the House and Senate, there were not enough votes to gain the two-thirds majorities to override Bush's veto.

A majority of Americans, including abortion opponents, support more embryonic stem cell research. The bill would have allowed federal funding on stem cells derived from frozen embryos, scheduled for destruction, stored at fertility clinics.

Pozdro noted that despite Bush's stance, the research will continue in other countries.

"I'm trying to look on the positive side," she said. "We'd like to have the answers and solutions to this problem as soon as we could. One minute sooner is better."

Comments

xenophonschild 7 years, 9 months ago

Another reason Bushie will go down as the worst - all time. What idiots can ever think this twit is a good president? He's worse than Herbert Hoover, worse than Millard Fillmore, worse than James Buchanan, even worse than Warren G. Harding - which really took some doing.

Best thing this idiot can do when he's an ex-president is stay in the shadows and keep his mouth shut.

0

holygrailale 7 years, 9 months ago

I'm with usaschools on this one.

"slave clone babies" ----parkay

HAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH

0

usaschools 7 years, 9 months ago

parkay, that is the most absurd BS I've seen on these boards in some time. You would have to be a conspiracy theorist of the whackjob extreme type to believe that drivel. It would require the complicity of researchers and students all over the world. Have you been abducted by UFO's and probed lately too?Lemme guess, you know lots about this area of science, but you don't believe in evolution either? Have you ever personally known anyone who does this type of research? I have and I do. They are not interested in "slave clone babies" or "fetal farming."

You are right that there is promise in adult stem cells, but the issue of which form of stem cells will be most productive in terms of research and cures is still way up in the air. One cannot accuately make claims such as you have regarding their relative benefit.

Anyway, I feel SO much safer now that the extra frozen embryos will not be used for research to help others, but will instead be flushed down the toilet, put in a red bag and thrown in the trash, autoclaved, or, in the best case scenario, incinerated; just as God intended it to be.

0

Ray Parker 7 years, 9 months ago

The ESCR funding bill was a smokescreen to push us toward funding fetal farming of slave clone babies. ESCR by itself has no probability whatsoever of producing any cures - not one in the last 20 years of taxpayer funded ESCR. The number of congressmen voting for ESCR funding would drop to about zero if highly profitable patents on manufacturing human life were outlawed, and new stem cell companies were required to be non-profit. ESCR is still useless, unethical, and immoral, folks, and we don't even need to consider it, because of cures and treatments produced and still forthcoming from adult stem cell research. Private funding for ESCR is practically nonexistent, and for good reason.

0

logicsound04 7 years, 9 months ago

So.........throwing the embryos away doesn't count as murder? It's only murder if you use them in a scientific manner to help others with severe disabilities?

When Bush refers to the moral boundary, I think he means "the use of science" rather than using embryos per se. Remember, he was all for the creationist bull$hit too.

0

holygrailale 7 years, 9 months ago

Agnostick:

You expected Bush to make the correct choice???

I know you better than that.

=======================================

Gee, I wonder how we'll be able to say we're #1 in health care when we start buying new heart, kidney, pancreas, lung and liver tissue from Korea.

0

Agnostick 7 years, 9 months ago

Stupid is as stupid does. Besides, it's not like there's a re-election battle in his future...

Agnostick agnostick@excite.com

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.