March 7, 2014 |
49° Fair with Haze
See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
Who cares? IF they aren't inappropriate in content, leave folks alone. In 30-40 years no one without a tat will be able to get a job. We are just in transition.
And the star bellied sneetches will be back in charge :-)
most tattoos i see in this town are horrible. of course, I have perfect skin with small pores and beautiful radiance, so I would never cover my golden skin with any such nonsense.
If the tats are on one's buttocks, yes!
That would depend on where you work, I suppose. If you work at my church I would say yes, cover that ungodly body graffiti up. The lord at his house doesn't need to see such sinful glorification of the devil.
The lord (Lord?) only resides in your church?
uh oh. i wonder what i'm supposed to do with this 666 tattooed on my forehead. i just accepted a position at your church. what is your advice?
run for president
So, would a cross be considered "ungodly graffiti"?
Wow! Your god can't see through clothing?? Doesn't already know what's on the skin of his people? Wow. What a weak and puny god.
I remember an ad campaign for a church in TX trying to attract young people. It was a picture of Jesus on the cross and it read, "Of course people with pierced body parts are welcome in our church".
A lot of the tats I see are depictions of biblical passages or biblical quotes.
What if you're a dancer at a gentlemen's club? Would you be required to then?
This pole question seemed a little outdated. Most people have a least one tattoo, and most employers allow it. Tattoos should be allowed unless they are inappropriate.
"Most people have a least one tattoo, and most employers allow it. "
Yea, site your souce. You should have said more and more people are getting tattoos. But then again that depends on what part of the country you live in.
Also, the statement of "tattoos should be allowed" is not right also. You have to remeber that the business itself may think its okay. BUT, what they have to consider is if the clients think it is okay...even if the art is non-offensive. We are a global economy and many countries and cultures that we do business with do find tattoos as offensive in general. You offend the client, you offend your investors with loss of income. Its how the world works. Its controlled by the client base. Example is custom motorcycle shops, it is assumed to be part of the culture and people are okay and in some ways expect to see it. The other might be in International Healthcare services, seeing a person with tattoos would be viewed as unprofessional and unreliable and unclean. At my place of work they say its okay as long as it doesn't violate HR policy. Even then, when we have clients or important people coming over for a visit, especially from Asia market. People are required to hide up tattoos as to not offend them....since they are paying us.
A lot of people I know in the army have them. However, the new regulation states that they must not be visible in the summer physical fitness uniform (Short sleeved t-shirt and shorts). Obviously, some current members will be grandfathered.
Knew a dude back in the '60's who had his junk tattooed as a barber pole. (Took months, he said) He also lost part of his left foot in a construction accident. When he went to the bar he would proclaim,"My (****) is a candy cane and I got a foot and a half! Anybody wants to buy my drinks, I'll prove it!"
And then there was the guy who his buddies thought had gone too far by having him his junk tattooed with his girlfriend's name: "Wendy". But his girlfriend loved it...because it really said "Welcome to Texas. Have a nice day" :-)
yes. keep your trashy tattoo to yourself and covered.
I've been challenged by a colleague to see as many "cougar tramp stamps" as I can. I'm up to 14.
Facial tatoos aways look so fetching in mug shots.
Tattoos are a childish way to get people to look at you. They scream, look at me, look at me, I'll even deface my body to get a little attention.
By that token, plucking your eyebrows and having hi-lighted hair are pretty childish, too.
you are clueless
Not Sure should be It Depends. If you're a bouncer or pole dancer, it probably doesn't matter. If you're Sergeant at Arms for the local biker gang, they're probably required. If you're a TV preacher, you should probably keep them covered.
The most interesting tats I've only seen part of.
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Veterans have been getting tattoos for probably 100 years. Even those with college degrees.
Discrimination is not a legal practice.
Yes, yes it is. The tattooed are not a protected class. I can't wait until these clowns with the ear stretchers and huge tats that are impossibe to conceal try to get jobs after they finish their degrees. Enjoy being an underemployed "individual" making fries.
No, they should not be covered in the workplace. They should removed with kerosene and high heat.
It should be part of the dress code. Their is no absolute answer and no "not sure"
Same answer. Same reason.
"Not sure" was as close as I could get to "depends on the workplace and the tattoo"
Yeah, part of the dress code, no end all answer.
I've never found something I'd be willing to have on my body for the rest of my life. For the record, most tattoos on girls are pretty unsexy.
Soooo, that leaves the boys.
Ha, thank you.
I feel I am unqualified to judge sexiness of tattoos on males.
I voted yes, but it really depends on the workplace.
I voted no. After wwii, tons of guys had tatts. Today I either love to see them or wince. It is a very quick way to judge a book by it's cover. Well thought out ones impress me, whereas 4th grade artwork, or ones with no meaning like skulls...
btw, if everyone is getting a trend, don't. Be original.
I'm talking chinese letters, trampstamps, skulls, necknames, moustaches on your finger, etc.
Not in the Harley shop!
Tats are trendy and will fade very soon, I think. they are unseemly and when too many are there, they take away from the what they were meant to do. take Corey and Chumley on the TV show Pawn Stars. You can't make them out because there are too many so they look terrible. The same with Thomas Robinson. Too many take away from the look. My nephew has a tree tattoo on his shoulder and it is very artistic but he wants to add more which will detract from the lone tree.
Piercings are also ugly and pointless. they first were to shock people. The worst of them is when they pierce their tongue. I know what that is for and to think I am talking to a girl who has this pierced and I don't know the last time she used it. Maybe just before I ordered food from her at a restaurant.
Trendy? Tattoos have been around since 5000 BC. I don't think people will stop getting them any time soon.
Unfortunately, tattoos will not fade away soon (I know, I know, I'm taking your words out of context) which is why I've never had one. There are a few I've admired, but mostly not.
Personally I can't see spending 500-1000 dollars on a black blob that I will regret in 20 years.
Kind of a moot question. You have to have a job first and visible tatoos are interview enders.
No they're not. Depends on the job, the business, the corporate culture, the interviewer, etc., etc., etc.
Keep in mind that these young people who are getting these tattoos are going to be the business owners, bosses, and supervisors in the next decade or two.
Aren't any of you old enough to remember back in the 60s when guys with long hair were called freaks and beaten up by guys with short hair? And how those same short-haired guys grew their own hair long a few years later???
Personally, I think gauging your ears is weird...but I also remember seeing pictures in National Geographic 60 years ago of cultures where ear gauging was normal and considered a mark of beauty.
The more things change, the more they stay the same. Including older generations finding fault with the superficial behavior of younger generations...without realizing that they sound just like their older generations - the old farts that they found so old-fashioned and "out of it" :-)
Depends on the job and whether or not the tattoo is appropriate. Back in middle school we had a substitute teacher and asked him to show off his war tattoos (all on his arms). They looked pretty cool but a naked women on your forearm wouldn't be accepted by most people.
For silly tattoos of flowers, symbols, and meaningful quotes/sayings: seems to violate a persons freedom to represent their creativity towards life when banned/restricted.
Here's the guide for those who need that sort of thing:
What if it's part of my religious practice to have a visible tattoo? Freedom of religion, anyone? A business cannot tell someone they cannot practice their religious beliefs, right?
Pssst! I think Alyosha was being sarcastic.
Humans have been modifying their bodies for nearly ALL of their history. It's only recently where the paradigm has become that it is somehow unseemly.
They don't belong in the professional world. Otherwise, do what you want with them.
It really depends on your job. There are some jobs where tattoos aren't frowned upon. Others consider them unprofessional. My boyfriend strategically got his tattoo so that it would be covered by a business suit or a dress shirt. If you plan on working in a professional environment, get a tattoo in a place that can be covered or don't get one. I'm sure there are people you work with that have tattoos that you would never know about.
If a person has more tattoos than skin showing, then I'd say do some covering up. If the art is in good taste, why not let it be displayed?
Who even comes up with these "poll" questions? They're always so vague that without any context they can't bet answered with "yes" or "no."
I know someone who has a small tattoo of a dolphin on her ankle and works as a lifeguard at a pool. Not quite sure how an employer could require her to cover it unless they expect her to wear boots or socks with her bathing suit.
"....The child is amoral. To our eyes, the Papuan is too. The Papuan kills his enemies and eats them. He is not a criminal. But when modern man kills someone and eats him he is either a criminal or a degenerate. The Papuan tattoos his skin, his boat, his paddles, in short everything he can lay hands on. He is not a criminal. The modern man who tattoos himself is either a criminal or a degenerate. There are prisons in which eighty per cent of the inmates show tattoos. The tattooed who are not in prison are latent criminals or degenerate aristocrats. If someone who is tattooed dies at liberty, it means he has died a few years before committing a murder....."
-- "Ornament and Crime", Adolf Loos, 1908
I look forward to the day when people can wear what clothes they like, wear their hair as they like, any piercings, tats, jewelry, whatever, or not if they choose to be unadorned, without derision. I have a minor personal affectation of my hair. It hardly draws any attention these days. It's good to express yourself some way or another. I like it when I see some interesting ink, or a creative clothing style, even the occasional mohawk. Would you rather we all came out of the same mold?
Yes. I was recently at a bar where I stopped for a quick refreshment. To my shock and surprise the young ladies that had congregated there seemed to exercising with very little clothing. Let me tell you they were gyrating and spinning around this long metal pole. They were all covered in tattoos. It was really terribly distracting.
It's up to the employer. But tattoos are pretty mainstream nowadays. You have to be really original to shock people with them. (I'm thinking of one tattoo I've seen in particular. It was pretty offensive. But the person lives in Lawrence, so I don't think I'll say)
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·