Advertisement

Opinion

Opinion

Opinion: A private life, a public loss

November 14, 2012

Advertisement

— The sudden resignation of David Petraeus as CIA director over an affair makes me very sad, and quite angry. There’s something wrong with a political system that destroys men of his talent over a very human mistake.

Yes, I know he showed bad judgment and may have considered it a matter of honor to step down. But I think his resignation should have been rejected. Can our system really afford to lose him and upend the CIA, yet again, over such a peccadillo? Do we really have such talent to spare?

Petraeus was not accused of any security breach, and — as the whole world now knows — the affair was discovered only tangentially through another FBI investigation. This is now an unfortunate situation he must resolve with his wife. But why, at a time when the CIA is crucial in anti-terrorism operations, and Petraeus so knowledgeable on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Africa and the Middle East, should the country lose his skills because of a personal matter?

Watching from Cairo, where guns and jihadis are passing through from next door Libya and making the Sinai into a new terrorist nexis, I wonder how Petraeus’ exit will affect the efforts to curb this problem? Or to deal with the influx of jihadis into Syria, or drone attacks in Pakistan, etc. etc.

Who can be surprised that, having served multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past decade, under incredible pressure, this disciplined general might have slipped up? Had he compromised security it would be one thing. But if not, why should the whole country pay the price for his marital sin?

The perils of false purity became clear during the impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton. Supposedly that mess was precipitated because he lied, but in reality it was a political vendetta. It backfired when many of the legislators who decried the president’s immorality were revealed to have committed similar or worse acts in private.

Shouldn’t we have learned to be wary of penalizing our leaders for sins of the flesh?

News reports say the Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper asked Petraeus to resign, and he agreed. I don’t know the details. But I do know that even those who criticized Petraeus as overly ambitious recognize the sacrifices he made for his country. My many trips to Iraq left no doubt in my mind that the counterinsurgency strategy he promoted there prevented an even more grisly civil war, and ended the heaviest fighting. In Afghanistan, he did the best possible with the hand he was dealt.

Stephen Kinzer has an op-ed in the New York Times Saturday detailing the serial affairs of Allen Dulles, CIA chief from 1953 to 1961, in the pre-Internet days when such behavior wasn’t reported. Dulles’ compulsive womanizing probably did jeopardize his work, unlike Petraeus’ folly. But reading this piece made me yearn for the days when national leaders were judged on performance, and their private lives remained just that.

— Trudy Rubin is a columnist and editorial board member for the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Comments

FlintlockRifle 2 years, 1 month ago

Should have talked to ""SLICK WILLE"" on how to get out of this mess---

colleen behrends 2 years, 1 month ago

They are saying Broadwell, as an intelligence officer in the U.S. Military Reserve, had security clearance to review the documents.

oldbaldguy 2 years, 1 month ago

I have mixed emotions about this. He is a good general but is he non-replaceable? The answer is no. Should private life pecadillos impede public service? Yes and no. If he was still on active duty, he could be court-martialed for adultery. This is just stupid.

Richard Heckler 2 years, 1 month ago

This is the mission of the CIA.

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is a neo-conservative think tank with strong ties to the American Enterprise Institute. PNAC's web site says it was “established in the spring of 1997” as “a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership.”

PNAC's policy document, “Rebuilding America's Defences,” openly advocates for total global military domination. Many PNAC members held highest-level positions in the George W. Bush administration.

Some PNAC members in prominent government positions.

Dick Cheney Former Vice President

Donald Rumsfeld Former Secretary of Defense

Douglas J. Feith (former) Undersecretary of Defense

I. Lewis Libby Vice President Cheney’s former Chief of Staff and Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs.

Aaron Friedberg Vice President Cheney’s deputy National Security advisor

Robert Zoelick US Deputy Secretary of State

Paula Dobriansky Undersecretary of State

Elliott Abrams Deputy National Security Adviser

Frank Gaffney Pentagon's Defense Policy Board

Fred C. Ikle Pentagon's Defense Policy Board

Eliot A. Cohen Pentagon's Defense Policy Board

Henry S. Rowen Pentagon's Defense Policy Board

William J. Bennett Presidential speech writer

Jeb Bush Former Governor of Florida

Paul Wolfowitz World Bank President

John Bolton Ambassador to the U.N.

Zalmay Khalilzad U.S. ambassador to Iraq

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

http://oldamericancentury.org/pnac.htm

jhawkinsf 2 years, 1 month ago

Simply inserting CIA into the first sentence doesn't make this diatribe any less off topic.

Richard Heckler 2 years, 1 month ago

Both the generals and the women knew they were messing in risky business. All generals can be replaced. Are the sexy looking women double agents? Are sexy women a male weakness?

Hopefully the next general will focus on stopping the violent war and bring the troops home.

The generals involved will skate... the bottom line. Congress and the military will protect them no matter what. Tough talk is PR stuff.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.