Washington A generation ago, it was the three I’s. A presidential challenger’s obligatory foreign trip meant Ireland, Italy and Israel. Mitt Romney’s itinerary is slightly different: Britain, Poland and Israel.
Not quite the naked ethnic appeal of yore. Each destination suggests a somewhat more subtle affinity: Britain, playing to our cultural connectedness with the Downton Abbey folks who’ve been at our side in practically every fight for the last hundred years; Poland, representing the “new Europe,” the Central Europeans so unashamedly pro-American; Israel, appealing to most American Jews but also to an infinitely greater number of passionately sympathetic evangelical Christians.
Unlike Barack Obama, Romney abroad will not be admonishing his country, criticizing his president or declaring himself a citizen of the world. Indeed, Romney should say nothing of substance, just offer effusive expressions of affection for his hosts — and avoid needless contretemps, like his inexplicably dumb and gratuitous critique of Britain’s handling of the Olympic Games. The whole point is to show appreciation for close allies, something the current president has conspicuously failed to do.
On the contrary. Obama started his presidency by returning to the British Embassy the bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office. Then came the State Department official who denied the very existence of a U.S.-British special relationship, saying: “There’s nothing special about Britain. You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world.”
To be topped off by the slap they received over the Falkland Islands, an issue the Brits had considered closed since they repelled the Argentine invasion there 30 years ago. They were not amused by the Obama administration’s studied neutrality between Britain and Argentina, with both a State Department spokesman and the president ostentatiously employing “Malvinas,” the politically charged Argentine name, interchangeably with “Falklands.” (Although the president flubbed it, calling them the “Maldives,” an Indian Ocean island chain 8,000 miles away.)
As for Poland, it was stunned by Obama’s unilateral cancellation of a missile defense agreement signed with the Bush 43 administration. Having defied vociferous Russian threats in order to help us defend against Iranian missiles, the Poles expected better treatment than to wake up one morning — the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland, no less — to find themselves the victim of Obama’s “reset” policy of accommodation with Russia. So much for protection from Russian bullying, something they thought they had finally gained with the end of the Cold War.
And then there is Israel, the most egregious example of Obama’s disregard for traditional allies. Obama came into office explicitly intent on creating “daylight” between himself and Israel, believing that by tilting toward the Arabs, they would be more accommodating.
The opposite happened. (Surprise!) When Obama insisted on a building freeze in Jerusalem that no U.S. government had ever demanded and no Israeli government would ever accept, the Palestinian Authority saw clear to become utterly recalcitrant. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas openly told The Washington Post that he would just sit on his hands and wait for America to deliver Israel.
Result? Abbas refused to negotiate. Worse, he tried to undermine the fundamental principle of U.S. Middle East diplomacy — a negotiated two-state solution — by seeking unilateral U.N. recognition of Palestinian statehood, without any talks, concessions or bilateral agreements.
In Israel, Romney will undoubtedly say nothing new. He’ll just reiterate his tough talk on Iran’s nuclear program. But I suspect he’ll let the Israelis know privately that contrary to the conventional wisdom that his hawkishness signals his readiness to attack Iranian nuclear facilities, his real intent is to signal that, unlike Obama, he is truly committed to permitting Israel to do what it needs to defend itself. This will be welcome news to a nation that has never asked anyone to fight on its behalf, just a green light to defend itself without impediments or veiled threats from its friends.
Most important, however, is to just show up. That’s 80 percent of life, Woody Allen once noted. No need to say much. Romney’s very presence will make the statement.
To the Israelis: “We understand your unique plight. If and when you do as you must, we will stand by you.” To the Poles: “You can count on the American umbrella. I will never leave you out in the cold.” And to the British: “We are grateful for your steadfast solidarity in awful places like Iraq and Afghanistan. The relationship truly is special.”
“And one more thing. Still have that bust of Churchill?”



Comments
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 10 months ago
Shame on Obama for not carrying Israel's apartheid water!!!!
Getaroom 10 months ago
Krauthammer, still blabbering the same ol' stuff.
The broken record knows only to drone on and on.......
oldbaldguy 10 months ago
We do have a special relationship with the Brits. It should be maintained. Churchills' bust should be in the Whitehouse. We do cater to the Israeli's too much. The Poles are staunch allies, we should say so in public. The Russians are not the foes they were in the Cold War, but they are not our friends under the new Czar.
Ron Holzwarth 10 months ago
Some people that have never been to Israel do not know, or chose to not know, any facts about Israel.
1) Almost 50% of Israelis are refugees from Arab countries.
2) In the Arab countries that have confiscated all property that used to belong to Jewish people, which is almost all of them, all of the Jews have been expelled.
3) In Israel, Jews, Christians, and Muslims all have equal rights under the law.
“He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions.” - Confucius
Ron Holzwarth 10 months ago
This is an exact word for word transcription of a conversation that I had in about 1986 with W. B., my supervisor at work. He claimed he was a Palestinian, although he grew up in Egypt.
W.B. "They (the Jews) are our cousins."
Me: "Then, why do you hate the Jews so much?"
W.B. "I don't know! We just do!"
P.S. W.B. told me that the Qur'an is so beautiful and poetic, but it loses so much in a translation into English, because it can only be properly understood in the original Arabic. And, he told me he would give me a copy of it in English, the local mosque here in Lawrence had copies to give away to anyone that was interested. But, he never did give me a printed copy of it. Of course, in the age of the internet, printed copies are no longer necessary.
Here's an online searchable Qur'an in English, from the University of Michigan: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/k/koran/
Disclaimer: The above is an electronic version of The Holy Qur'an, translated by M.H. Shakir and published by Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an, Inc., in 1983. The text was provided by the Online Book Initiative and subsequently marked up at the HTI in SGML. Like all the versions of this text derived from the Online Book Initiative, it is not free from errors and represents the text as published. We will strive to correct any transcription errors pointed out to us.
wounded_soldier 10 months ago
Ron Holzwrath, I would enjoy giving you a better translation of the Qur'an than the Shakir one. The one translated by A Yusef Ali is the best I have read and during this month of Ramadan, it would be a nice thing to do.
jhawkinsf 10 months ago
Do Muslims have equality under the law in Israel? You mean like Blacks and Latinos here? You mean like gays and women here?
I don't know the answer to your question, but I suspect an honest answer would be no. They do not enjoy full equality. But Canada has it's problems as does Mexico. And now that I've mentioned every country in North America, we can begin naming every country on every continent.
Paul R. Getto 10 months ago
"In Israel, Romney will undoubtedly say nothing new"............A good observation here.
In [----------] Romney will undoubtedly say nothing new...........Keep this around; it will be handy as the campaign progresses and will most likely be true in most circumstances.......
Romney is a nice guy, but an empty suit who has destroyed or hidden most of the records that could explain him better to the voters.
Paul R. Getto 10 months ago
Sadly, I don't disagree. We are all victims of the fantasy that there is someone running for office who will save us from ourselves.
Agnostick 10 months ago
Clearly this was written before Romney flew across the pond!
#AmericanBorat by Agnostick
Alyosha 10 months ago
Why does the LJW print this guy's stuff? Krauthammer claims, "Obama started his presidency by returning to the British Embassy the bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office."
This is flatly untrue. Here's a photo proving that the Churchill bust is indeed in the White House:
Here's the bust of Churchill, still in the White House. by Alyosha
So, why the lie? Either a) Krauthammer isn't smart enough to look up something, or b) he's intentionally lying in order to influence voters. In either case, he proves himself without credibility.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/07/27/fact-check-bust-winston-churchill
Commenting has been disabled for this item.