Young supporters of Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., yell during a political rally on the campus of Florida A&M University in Tallahassee, Fla., in this Sept. 28, 2008, file photo. Young people were quick to get involved in the campaign to elect Obama, but political experts and youths themselves now say they’ve seen a marked drop in “Obamamania” on college campuses and elsewhere since the election, as the realities of political drudgery have set in, leaving some to wonder whether the president can count on his loyal supporters to help him on tough issues like health care reform.

Chicago ? Young Americans showed their collective power when they helped vote President Obama into office. Inspired by his message of “change,” they knocked on doors, spread fliers, voted for him by a 2-1 margin, and partied like rock-the-vote stars when he won.

Since the election, though, that fervor has died down — noticeably. And while young people remain the president’s most loyal supporters in opinion polls, a lot of people are wondering why that age group isn’t doing more to build upon their newfound reputation as political influencers.

“It’s one thing to get excited about a presidential candidate. It’s another thing to become a responsible citizen,” says Jennifer Donahue, political director for the New Hampshire Institute Of Politics. She and other political analysts thinks they have yet to prove themselves.

Just bystanders

Professors and students themselves also are noticing the quiet on college campuses, which were hotbeds for “Obamamania” during the campaign.

“They’re supportive, but in a bystander kind of way,” says Laura Katz Olson, a political science professor at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania.

Erin Carroll, a 19-year-old sophomore at LaSalle University in Philadelphia, blames the lack of engagement on her generation’s short attention span. They want change — right now, she says — and haven’t gotten it.

“I feel like everybody walks around with their cell phone and their laptops. We feel like we need everything immediately. So that’s what we’ve become accustomed to,” Carroll says. “We’re the ‘me-me-me’ generation.”

It’s not just on college campuses.

Russ Marshalek, a 27-year-old professional in Astoria, N.Y., observes his 20-something peers sitting back and letting the president do the work for them. “Rather than allow him to speak FOR us, we need to be inspired BY him, and volunteer in our communities, speak our minds, write, read, think, act,” says Marshalek, a social media director who works with small businesses.

No easy issues

Such is the fate of Generation Y, as they’re known, both praised for their willingness to volunteer but also maligned as the “entitlement generation” — eager to help but unsure how to deal with tumultuous times that are a first for many of them.

On top of that, many of their parents are baby boomers who witnessed, and participated in, the civil rights movement and Vietnam War protests that followed John F. Kennedy’s death. That’s a lot to live up to.

But to be fair, says political scientist Mike Wagner says, it’s tough for young people — or any American, for that matter — to know how to get involved in issues with solutions that aren’t always so clear-cut.

Volunteering for a candidate? Fairly easy to do. Helping solve some of the toughest issues to face our nation, from health care reform to a deep-seated financial crisis? Not so much.

“These aren’t easy issues for young people. It’s not ‘Should we go to war in Iraq?’ or ‘Should gay marriage be legalized?'” says Wagner, an assistant professor at the University of Nebraska.

He sees a lot of young people getting lost in the details, or bored by them. Or like a lot of us, they’re more focused on their own worries, such as getting a job or paying off mountains of student loans.

Some say the president also could be doing more to engage this demographic that was so key to his early success.

“I think young people do have clout, and I think it’s a mistake if he doesn’t use them,” says Mary Ellen Balchunis, a political science professor at LaSalle University, who counts Carroll among her students. Balchunis witnessed the fervor on campus during the campaign — the “dorm storming,” when students persuaded their peers to go to rallies and eventually to the polls. She also recalls how students danced in the streets with nearby neighborhood residents after Obama won.

In need of a talking-to

Certainly, health care was on their priority list then, and remains so. An AP-GfK poll conducted earlier this month found that two-thirds of 18- to 29-year-olds rated such reform as “very” or “extremely” important. So far, though, the proposed health care overhauls have failed win the support of a good number of them. Only about half of them said they approved of the way the president was handling health care and only 38 percent said they supported health care plans being discussed in Congress.

Balchunis thinks the president could boost youth support on these and other issues — and get them influencing their parents, as they did in the election — if he mobilized and spoke directly to them, the way he did during the campaign. He could, for instance, make use of student groups that campaigned for him to push the issues of the day.

If he doesn’t, Balchunis thinks that also could have negative ramifications for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections, because those young voters will lose interest and won’t bother to show up at the polls.

Gridlock

Certainly, the ugliness of the political process has turned off some young people, and made even some of the president’s most ardent supporters antsy.

“The only thing that has changed in my mind is the sense of urgency I feel for the president to do what he came to Washington to do,” says Sam An, a 20-year-old student and president of the Young Democrats group at the St. Louis College of Pharmacy. “I feel that if he got some substantial things accomplished, it might quell the heated political discourse.”

That’s tough to do in a system that was set up to encourage legislative gridlock, even if it doesn’t fit well with young people’s hunger for change, says Joshua Dyck, an assistant professor of political science at the University at Buffalo.

“Gridlock is as American as apple pie,” Dyck says. “The question is whether getting excited about an election and then being exposed to the letdown, the gridlock and compromise, whether that will lead to an erosion of the voter turnout gains we saw in 2008.”