Business
Collection of U.S. banks repay $68 billion received from bailout
June 18, 2009
Advertisement
A man walks out of Goldman Sachs headquarters in this Sept. 16, 2008, file photo in New York. Goldman Sachs said Wednesday that it has finished repaying a $10 billion government investment. The bank made the disclosure in letters to high-ranking congressmen and senators on Tuesday.
Washington A key government effort to ease the credit crisis reached a milestone Wednesday as 10 large banks said they had repaid a total of $68 billion in bailout funds.
Treasury said last week that the banks could begin repaying money they received under the $700 billion financial system bailout known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. The government created the program in October as its flagship effort to address the global credit crisis and teetering financial markets.
Meanwhile, officials hustled to prepare an announcement about the pricing of stock warrants Treasury holds — a final barrier to the banks’ ending their ties to the bailout program. The warrants allow Treasury to buy the banks’ stock at a fixed price at some future date. The banks now want to buy back those warrants.
Concerns over program limits
The flurry of activity around TARP followed months of criticism from opponents of government intervention in the financial industry. It showed that some of the biggest TARP investments are winding down sooner than many had feared.
More than $70 billion has been returned to the fund. That includes Wednesday’s redemptions and about $2 billion in earlier repayments from smaller banks.
But until the banks can buy back the stock warrants Treasury holds, they remain entangled in a program that has subjected them to limits on executive pay and other restrictions. The banks have chafed against TARP from early on, fearing government-imposed rules could hurt their profits and prevent them from hiring or keeping top talent.
The warrants are hard to price because their values will fluctuate along with the banks’ stock prices. Treasury wanted more money to unwind the contracts than the banks were willing to pay.
Uncertainty surrounding the warrant sales raises questions about whether Treasury “is getting the best possible price for taxpayers,” the Government Accountability Office charged in a report Wednesday.
The GAO also urged Treasury to create consistent rules for evaluating bank requests to buy their way out of TARP.
Wednesday marked the first repayment opportunity for the 10 large banks whose exit applications Treasury approved last week.
Throughout the day, the banks announced that they had finished repaying the government money.
The banks were: JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., U.S. Bancorp, Capital One Financial Corp., American Express Co., BB&T Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Northern Trust Corp. and State Street Corp.
Requirements to leave TARP
To begin the process of leaving TARP, the banks had to clear a series of hurdles designed to make sure they would remain viable despite the financial crisis and the recession.
All but Northern Trust underwent government “stress tests” to ensure they had an extra capital buffer in case the recession worsened. The 10 also were required to raise equity from investors and raise debt without a government guarantee.
Despite their relative strength, the banks still rely on government subsidies, including guarantees on debt they already issued and discounted credit lines from the Federal Reserve.
The rapid repayments are not necessarily a sign that TARP itself will be scaled back. Treasury has said the money would be returned to the $700 billion bailout fund. It could be recycled in loans to other institutions the government hopes will lend money to people and businesses, supporting an economic recovery.
But an announcement about warrant pricing is expected by Friday, according to two industry sources who spoke anonymously because the matter was not yet public.
That clarification and Wednesday’s repayments provide a clearer way forward for banks wishing to end their involvement with the government’s financial stabilization plans.
The size of the TARP repayments far exceeds the $25 billion that Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner projected banks would repay this year.
Besides the money they’re returning, the banks have paid Treasury more than $2 billion in dividends mandated under TARP. The banks pay 5 percent dividends for the first five years. After that, the government would charge them 9 percent interest.
In addition, taxpayers will receive billions in exchange for the warrants, once Treasury and the banks agree on how to price them.
More like this
- Selected banks to return bailout money June 9, 2009
- Uses for $700 billion bailout money ever shifting 4 comments / October 26, 2008
- Banks soon to repay borrowed billions June 12, 2009
- Banks still in distress, Geithner tells overseers 5 comments / April 22, 2009
- Companies start competing for piece of bailout pie 4 comments / October 26, 2008
Top ads RSS
- Schwans Home Service now hiring starting at $32,000 a yr. ...
- HOLIDAY RUSH $400/$600 week. 30 openings available in various departments ...
- Now Hiring Experienced Sales People $9/hour + commission + bonus ...
- ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Fundraising and public relations firm seeking full-time administrative ...
- Financial Manager Research & Graduate Studies (RGS) and the KU ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Mangino's contract outlines probe November 21, 2009 · 54 comments
- Nation has right to ask ‘why?’ November 21, 2009 · 36 comments
- Blog: Palin Book Could Be Your Cheapest Source For Winter Fuel November 20, 2009 · 74 comments
- Blog: We Noticed November 19, 2009 · 123 comments
- Leaders offer tips for chancellor’s successful tenure November 21, 2009 · 4 comments
- On the street: Will you miss ‘The Oprah Winfrey’ show? November 21, 2009 · 15 comments
- Blog: Why Do People Repeat Falsehoods? November 20, 2009 · 52 comments
- United Way about $800,000 short of $1.8 million campaign goal November 20, 2009 · 22 comments
- Nothing to lose: Reeling KU huge underdog for a change November 21, 2009 · 21 comments
- Mangino denies validity of former player allegations November 19, 2009 · 158 comments
- Mangino's contract outlines probe November 21, 2009
- Four decades in crisis mode November 21, 2009
- On target November 21, 2009
- Lawrence couple excel in triathlons November 21, 2009
- A sad story November 19, 2009
- Chiefs honor ex-left offensive tackle Roaf December 15, 2008
- Researcher: Writing proves Shroud of Turin is real November 21, 2009
- Center for East Asian Studies celebrates 50 years of accomplishments November 21, 2009
- Commission votes against including gender identity in Lawrence's anti-discrimination policy November 19, 2009
- 40 years ago: Construction begins on Meadowlark addition November 21, 2009


18 June 2009
at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigAl (Anonymous) says…
Unless I am missing something, this sounds like pretty good news.
18 June 2009
at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Pilgrim2 (Anonymous) says…
“Treasury wanted more money to unwind the contracts than the banks were willing to pay.”
****************************************
And this surprises some people why? Now that the Barry Joe clan has its hooks in the financial industry, why would it let go? Ownership and control are the ultimate goal, and this is just the first step.