Advertisement

Archive for Friday, January 16, 2009

Some advice for Obama

January 16, 2009

Advertisement

Welcome to Washington, soon to be “Mr. President.” I know you’ve been here before for a short time as senator, but this is different. This is The Big Time, the world stage and you are the leading man.

You campaigned on change and won the election. That was the easy part. Every new administration comes to town thinking it will be better than the one before it, more honest, more ethical, more competent. But people and events have a way of frustrating the loftiest goals. All of your good intentions notwithstanding, no one person can change a city built on a swamp, a city that has taken on many of a swamp’s characteristics.

Even conservatives like me want you to succeed, so long as you don’t pursue a strictly left-wing agenda. Would you like to disarm the social conservatives? Instead of signing an executive order that strikes down what few restrictions remain on abortion, start with your declared intention to make abortion rare.

Ask for legislation that requires pregnant, abortion-minded women to receive full disclosure, including sonograms, so that their choice will be fully informed. Elevate the visibility of the pregnancy help centers around the country that quietly and without charge assist women before and after childbirth. They even help women who have chosen to have abortions. You will create a lot of goodwill among those who otherwise might oppose you.

Here’s another suggestion: focus less on ideology and more on how people can become independent of government. For too long, your party has emphasized misery, failure and government dependence instead of success, fulfillment and self-sufficiency. By spotlighting people who move from dependence to independence, you model and encourage achievement.

Take the lead in inspiring African-American youth to stay in school, study hard, delay sex until marriage and build a family. You are a great example of what right decision-making can produce. You can help change the attitude among too many African-American teens that studying and getting good grades is “acting white.” Set your people free, and your place in history will be assured no matter what else you do.

Don’t make the mistake Republicans made when they ran all three branches of government. Make Republicans feel like fellow Americans with a different plan for reaching similar goals. No one wants poorly performing schools, more poverty and a weak national defense. If we can agree on the problems, we can then discuss the best way to solve them. Include Republicans in your decision-making and at least occasionally embrace some of their ideas. Disarming your opponents is less bloody and can be more productive than crushing them. Most people are tired of the partisan bickering. If you produce results through a common ground approach, as you pledged to do during the campaign, you will engender goodwill. Goodwill is the capital every president must have to get anything done.

I realize this next suggestion is self-serving. Invite conservative columnists and opinion leaders in to see you. Explain to them what you are doing and consider their ideas for doing it better (or not at all). This, too, is likely to generate goodwill among some who could quickly be an impediment to your success. We conservatives don’t want to be saying “no” all the time, and that personality of yours might just win some of us over; if not on all of your policies, then at least on some. Fortunately, you made a good start here by recently meeting with conservative columnists who have been critical of you in the past. More of this is needed.

You may think you are all-powerful (or others may tell you that) but don’t let “the smell of the white paint,” as a friend who worked in the Nixon administration called it, intoxicate you. Humility is a strong quality that contrasts with the arrogance and hubris so often associated with the city in which you will temporarily reside. Work hard on thinking of others as better than yourself. In doing so, you might humble some of them, which would be a miracle in itself.

Good luck, God bless and I hope you succeed in the things with which conservatives can agree. And on those things we cannot agree, I at least promise to be more than a naysayer and suggest how they might be done better.

— Cal Thomas is a columnist for Tribune Media Services.

Comments

logicsound04 5 years, 3 months ago

"You mean like when Bush worked with Ted Kennedy on No Child Left Behind? And weren't the Democrats in charge of the Senate in 2002 when they authorized the use of force against Iraq?"---------------One example. Apparently I stand corrected. Everything else is obviously moot.And regarding the Senate...from 2000 to 2002, the Democrats had 51 seats (including 1 Independent) to the Republicans 49. Hardly "in charge".And while Democrats had the slimmest of majorities, the actual vote was as follows:Democrats - 29 ayes, 21 naysRepublicans - 48 ayes, 1 naySo you tell me who drove that resolution home...At any rate, I never mentioned the authorization to use force in Iraq, as that was not an example of the partisanship to which I was referring.

0

logicsound04 5 years, 3 months ago

"If McCain would have been elected President, how many liberal columnists would have written articles like this?"---------------Well, I (and you) obviously have no idea. But I imagine at least ONE would be a pretty safe bet, which is all we have here--one conservative columnist writing one column promoting bipartisanship. ======================="In defeat conservatives are willing to work with the other party for the good of the nation"---------------Again, this is ONE article by ONE conservative. That hardly qualifies as "conservatives" with a big 'C'. In fact, if I were going to use the LJWorld forum as any sort of barometer, I'd say that most conservatives aren't terribly eager to do much more than pounce on every opportunity to find flaws with the few steps Obama has taken thus far. Of course, it wouldn't be fair to use the LJWorld forum to measure such a thing.Plus, it's hard to extract much meaning from a willingness to work across the aisle when that party was not so willing when they were in the majority. It comes across like "oh crap, we better extend the olive branch so that they don't push us out the way we did to them", which was my original point.============================"When liberals are defeated they only want to tear the country apart to get back in power (see the last 8 years)."-------------I hardly qualify wanting to make sure the results of a hotly contested election (one in which the popular and electoral college results were split) were accurate as "tearing the country apart to get back in power".Furthermore, the bipartisan solidarity was fairly strong, especially after 9/11.By the way, your comment doesn't seem to convey this "willingness to work with the other party". It actually sounds like you are still chomping at the bit to demonize liberals.

0

scott3460 5 years, 3 months ago

Determine what george w. bush (or any right wing zealot republican, really) would do, do the opposite. If he can do this on a consistent basis he'll be one of the great Presidents.Alternatively, govern on behalf of what is left of the middle and working classes, with the goal of expanding the former.

0

jonas_opines 5 years, 3 months ago

"If McCain would have been elected President, how many liberal columnists would have written articles like this?"Probably a number of them, only one or two that made it into wide publication. Then some would probably scream about unfair election practices, his incompetence in selecting his cabinet, how much money he's spending on his inauguration, how he's already a failed president before his term started, bring out any potential scandals they could even possibly tie to him, etc. In other words, if you're not following (and I imagine you are) just the same as we have here.

0

jonas_opines 5 years, 3 months ago

"In defeat conservatives are willing to work with the other party for the good of the nation."But, apparently, only in defeat. That was sort of the point.Note, only particularly referencing Thomas here, not necessarily conservatives.

0

Kirk Larson 5 years, 3 months ago

"In defeat conservatives are willing to work with the other party for the good of the nation."The only reason Cal is reaching out is the knowledge that he's likely to be marginalized after all the "librul" bashing he's been doing and all the failed policies he's been promoting. Just a rat looking for a way off a sinking ship.

0

Exposer 5 years, 3 months ago

Satirical: "If McCain would have been elected President, how many liberal columnists would have written articles like this?"Leonard Pitts and others would be writing columns about how American is still a racist country (nevermind that if Obama had been white he never would have made it out of the primaries).

0

Exposer 5 years, 3 months ago

logicsound04:"Where was this advice when the Bush Administration and Republicans were taking such a unilateral approach to government until 2006?"You mean like when Bush worked with Ted Kennedy on No Child Left Behind? And weren't the Democrats in charge of the Senate in 2002 when they authorized the use of force against Iraq?

0

Satirical 5 years, 3 months ago

If McCain would have been elected President, how many liberal columnists would have written articles like this?In defeat conservatives are willing to work with the other party for the good of the nation.When liberals are defeated they only want to tear the country apart to get back in power (see the last 8 years).

0

Orwell 5 years, 3 months ago

Cal Thomas giving Obama advice on tolerance and inclusion is like…Well, no, it's not like anything. It's just so hypocritical it's one of a kind.

0

logicsound04 5 years, 3 months ago

I am in favor of the idea of bipartisanship. However, I have a hard time listening to someone who so often demonizes "liberals" to encourage Obama to welcome conservatives with open arms.Where was this advice when the Bush Administration and Republicans were taking such a unilateral approach to government until 2006?

0

slappedyomomma 5 years, 3 months ago

meggers (Anonymous) says… Winning the election was the easy part? Has Cal been hiding under a rock for the past two years? It was one of the nastiest, hardest fought elections of our nation's history, from the primary, right through the general election........................are you really serious about that comment? while the primary was close, the general election wasn't, and never should have been as close as it was. McCain never had a chance in this election, and no other Republican could have won either. i think that most reasonable people could agree on that. did he ever lead in the polls? if i remember correctly, he was only within 2 or 3 points for a total of about 2 weeks in the 4 months leading up to the election. this election was a slam-dunk for Obama, and would have been for any other Democrat. Obama could have said he was gay, also a muslim, wanted to legalize drugs and euthenasia, and still won this election (joking, of course). Al Franken could have won this election easily (which is saying something considering what is going on in MN).truthfully, i think Obama should have won by 10 points. but that whole "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" that Democrats have had going for them for the last 8 years kept it to about 5 or 6 points. he and Biden did give the Republicans some ammo ("spread the wealth", etc...) which kept it from being a complete blowout of an election.while the campaign was pretty nasty, it was not close or hard-fought. McCain ran a HORRIBLE campaign. Obama nearly shot himself in the foot and still won easily.truthfully, i think HRC would have won by 12 points.saying this election was one of the "hardest fought" is like comparing Quantrill's Raid to WWII. not even close.as far as Cal's article, he does have some decent ideas. not saying i like Cal. but there is that old saying "lead by example". truthfully, i am more worried about the idiots in Congress (Pelosi, Reid, etc.) than Obama...

0

Shane Garrett 5 years, 3 months ago

"The president-elect said he believes that direct government spending provides the most "bang for the buck" and that his advisers have worked to design tax cuts that would be most likely to spur consumer and business spending." I thought he was a tax and spend Democrate? Where did the ideal of tax cuts come from? All, I can say is.... Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Mine.

0

yourworstnightmare 5 years, 3 months ago

Maybe Cal should have given similar advice to Bush (to moderate his ideology).Maybe he did and Bush ignored it.

0

jonas_opines 5 years, 3 months ago

He does tend to write reach across the fence articles once in a while. As in, once every couple years, after the conservatives have been defeated in the voting booths. Then he returns to demonizing them, it seems.

0

meggers 5 years, 3 months ago

Winning the election was the easy part? Has Cal been hiding under a rock for the past two years? It was one of the nastiest, hardest fought elections of our nation's history, from the primary, right through the general election. Other than sitting on his @ss whining about how liberals are messing up his ridiculous 1950's version of America, what with all of our talk about equality, tolerance, human rights, environmental preservation, diversity, diplomacy, etc., what contribution has Mr. Thomas made to better our nation?I like that Obama is talking to reasonable conservatives to get their input, but I don't count Mr. Thomas in that category, and I hope Obama doesn't either. If anyone deserves to have the door slammed squarely in his face, it's the divisive and ideologically deranged Cal Thomas.

0

beobachter 5 years, 3 months ago

read the headline, was laughing so hard at Cal's thinking he could advise anyone, I couldn't read the article.

0

Kirk Larson 5 years, 3 months ago

I'm sorry, but I can't take advice from Cal seriously even if he means well. I would be worried that he's getting ready to stab me in the back. Weirdest thing about him is that picture of him they use with his column. The ends of his mouth are turned down, but if you look closely you realize he's smiling. How creepy is that?

0

i_tching 5 years, 3 months ago

Perhaps someday Cal could regale us with the inspiring story of how he deferred sex until he got married.And if you want to make abortion rare, Cal, you should be handing out condoms, not banalities.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.