Archive for Saturday, September 6, 2008
Congressman had no-interest mortgage
September 6, 2008
Advertisement
Washington — Rep. Charles Rangel paid no mortgage interest on a beach resort property for more than 10 years, a lawyer for the powerful House committee chairman said Friday.
The New York congressman's lawyer, Lanny Davis, said Rangel got his no-interest deal for the villa in the Dominican Republic because he was an original buyer in the resort development, and in the early days after Rangel's 1987 purchase the rental income it generated failed to meet expectations.
Davis said Rangel did not know until very recently he had not been charged interest for more than a decade.
"Mr. Rangel received no special preference," Davis said.
The Democratic chairman of the Ways and Means tax-writing committee has come under scrutiny for his vacation property and apartments he rents in his home district of Harlem.
More like this
- Jenkins criticizes Boyda for taking money from Rangel 19 comments / September 17, 2008
- Black lawmakers will have unprecedented clout in new Congress November 19, 2006
- Rangel admits mistake, plans to pay bill September 11, 2008
- Mississippi residents resent N.Y. congressman's remarks November 12, 2006
- Rangel has good idea for tax reform 1 comment / January 3, 2008
Top ads RSS
- Temporary Programmer Univ. of KS, Geological Survey Write function and ...
- Academic Advisor Hawk Link Retention Specialist The Office of Multicultural ...
- Brandon Woods
- Customer Service/ Manager Trainees!! $450/wk. Must be able to start ...
- LPN Baldwin Healthcare is currently accepting applications for a full ...
- No end in sight for budget problems November 9, 2009 · 2 comments
- New method makes meth more mobile November 9, 2009 · 4 comments
- Killing daughter can’t be matter of honor November 8, 2009 · 36 comments
- Blog: Dillons, Hyvee, And Checkers — I'Ve Shopped And Compared. See The Results. November 8, 2009 · 139 comments
- Schools consider new funding lawsuit November 9, 2009 · 5 comments
- History undercuts fears of global warming November 9, 2009 · 3 comments
- Algae’s energy potential blooms November 9, 2009 · 1 comment
- Mass shooting worst ever at U.S. military base; 12 killed November 6, 2009 · 191 comments
- House narrowly passes health care bill November 7, 2009 · 68 comments
- Patience November 9, 2009 · 1 comment
- Algae’s energy potential blooms November 9, 2009
- Lawrence aviation company ships plane to help protect endangered animals in Kenya November 9, 2009
- KU task force to focus on retaining students November 8, 2009
- Hidden Valley Camp sets cleanup day November 9, 2009
- Hospice dog leaves legacy of love, hope November 9, 2009
- Veterinary service: Lawrence vet spays, neuters animals abroad March 9, 2009
- Wildcats fired up November 8, 2009
- PB&J in the U.S.A. November 9, 2009
- Public invited to forum on proposal for new homeless shelter on East 23rd Street November 6, 2009
- Picture perfect November 9, 2009
6 September 2008
at 3:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
dagopman (Anonymous) says…
There is something very fishy about this situation. Rep. Rangel is no stranger to improper dealings. Rep. Boyda should immediately return the money Rangel donated to her campaign.
6 September 2008
at 8:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jmadison (Anonymous) says…
Business as usual for our political class. We have all received no interest mortgages, haven't we?
6 September 2008
at 8:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
powershopper (Anonymous) says…
What a spin this story is. There are no concrete details on what bank he received the loan from. Was it a bank in the United States, a bank overseas, or was it direct from the land developers who owned the property (this is known to be the case sometimes). Not to mention the fact that the home is the Dominican Republic, not the US. What a weak attemp to slander the Democratic Party during election time.
6 September 2008
at 12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
dagopman (Anonymous) says…
I don't care where the loan originated from: has any of you EVER received a no-interest mortgage? Enough said!!!
6 September 2008
at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Read fast, this is the last you'll hear of this matter.
6 September 2008
at 12:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
camper (Anonymous) says…
Just another crook. These politicians believe themselves elite, and they don't gotta play by the rules everyone else does. This moron cut in line. Everyone behind him had to pay interest.
6 September 2008
at 1:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
The loan originally carried a 10.5% interest rate and was to be paid back in 7 years. The lender was a labor lawyer in New York who has also contributed thousands of dollars to Rangel's campaigns.Rangel also received rental income from this property and did not report it. He is the Chairman of the Ways and Means committee, he writes tax law, and he did not fully report his income, to the tune of some $75,000. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/nyr… this were you or me, we'd be in jail; if Rangel were a Republican, he would be indicted. As a Democrat, he will get away with it.
6 September 2008
at 2:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jaywalker (Anonymous) says…
“What a weak attemp to slander the Democratic Party during election time”Absolutely! No interest mortgages, particularly those we do not know “until very recently (w)e had not been charged interest for more than a decade” on, are more the rule than the exception these days. Nothing improper about it, I'm sure. Much like the apartments in Harlem. So what if he was paying half price for a two condo luxury suite? And claiming it as an office, which is against congressional ethics, but really, everybody does it. Yeah, nothing to see here. Move along. Move along.
6 September 2008
at 3:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TheSychophant (Anonymous) says…
I tend to vote Democratic, but I am certainly not a blind camp follower: This statement: “Davis said Rangel did not know until very recently he had not been charged interest for more than a decade” sounds like a complete crock. Yeah, he didn't know. Nonsense. If he is that obvlious to his own financial affairs, he has no business serving in Congress. And if he lied about his knowledge, he has no business serving in Congress. A quiet resignation would be in order.
6 September 2008
at 3:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
dagopman (Anonymous) says…
Talk about a sweetheart deal. Boyda accepted campaign contributions from this crook. If she were truly independent, she is not, she would return the contributions.
6 September 2008
at 3:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jmadison (Anonymous) says…
The Democrats are as corrupt as the Republicans. Term limits should be looked at again to limit their “service” to our country. Washington and Jefferson limited themselves to 2 terms, why not our current crop of politicians. The political class needs to get real jobs and experience the idiotic laws they enact rather than exempt themselves from the rules that pertain to the rest of the citizenry
7 September 2008
at 7:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KEITHMILES05 (Anonymous) says…
Pretty sad to read about Rangel. His assertion he knew nothing of it is plain stupid and outright lying.