Advertisement

Archive for Friday, August 29, 2008

Democrats, Catholics at odds

August 29, 2008

Advertisement

— Democrats have made it a priority to lure more evangelical and Catholic voters from the Republican camp into their own, but the likelihood of success is becoming more problematic given pronouncements by two Catholic archbishops and a decision by the editor of an evangelical Christian magazine.

Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, the archbishop of Denver, said Democratic vice presidential candidate Joseph Biden should avoid taking communion because of his support for abortion rights.

In 2004, the Archbishop of Boston, Sean O'Malley, stood by a statement he had made the previous year that pro-choice Catholics are in a state of grave sin and cannot take communion properly. Around the same time, then-Cardinal (now Pope Benedict XVI) Joseph Ratzinger, in a private memorandum, told American bishops that communion must be denied to Catholic politicians who support legal abortion.

The memo and the statement by O'Malley were thought at the time to be directed at Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, who is Catholic. Kerry and many other Democratic and Republican Catholic politicians have mostly ignored such directives and taken communion anyway.

Appearing last Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried some theological hair-splitting. She described herself as "an ardent, practicing Catholic," but then said the church had only held its pro-life position for the last 50 years and that during the previous 2,000 years it had reached different conclusions about when life begins.

In an unusual public rebuke of a leading political figure, Washington, D.C., Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl said Pelosi was "incorrect" in her statement that the church had differed over the years about when life begins. Wuerl added, "We respect the right of elected officials such as Speaker Pelosi to address matters of public policy that are before them, but the interpretation of Catholic faith has rightfully been entrusted to the Catholic bishops. Given this responsibility to teach, it is important to make this correction for the record."

Wuerl said the catechism of the Catholic church has been clear for 2,000 years and he quoted from it: "Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. ... Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law."

Pelosi's office at first had no comment, but late Tuesday Pelosi's spokesman, Brendan Daly, issued a statement quoting the speaker as saying she was raised in a "devout" Catholic home, but that "not all Catholics believe that life begins at conception." That comment is worse than the first. It makes Catholic teaching a matter of personal preference, not objective truth. This exposes the Democrats' "outreach" effort to "people of faith" - and you can pick whichever faith you like as long as you vote for Democrats - as a fraud and an attempt to add just one more interest group to the Democratic Party's constellation.

The third item of bad news for Democrats, who thought they could fool serious Catholics and evangelical Christians, may not have the impact of the previous two, but it reveals another crack in the foundation Democrats are trying to build in their party for religious voters. Cameron Strang, 32-year-old editor of the "edgy" and "hip" Relevant Magazine, pulled out of delivering the benediction on the Democratic National Convention's first night for fear it might be construed as an endorsement of Barack Obama.

Democrats have worked hard to bring more religious voters into their fold. As part of their strategy they have promoted a dubious and debatable doctrine that big government should be doing the work of God on Earth. But Democrats want to pick and choose what they like about God and what they don't (Republicans sometimes do this as well in such matters as wealth and materialism).

While government has a role in addressing certain issues that can be considered biblically based (such as justice and poverty), Democrats see no role for government in helping to restrict sinful man when he wishes to kill the unborn, or allow - even promote - any and every relationship but traditional marriage.

It is in its failure to address these premier moral issues that the Democratic Party has unmasked itself as a party that cares less for God's agenda and more for its own, as it pursues the White House.

- Cal Thomas is a columnist for Tribune Media Services.

Comments

denak 5 years, 7 months ago

It would be a better strategy for the Democrats to promote the Doctrine of Social Justice when courting Catholics than to try to find a way around the sticky situation of abortion.The Catholic Church and most Catholics are pretty firm on the issue of abortion so instead of trying to change that, Democrats should promote issues such as universal health care, programs for the poor and elderly and other issues that would fall under the banner of "social justice."Dena

0

i_tching 5 years, 7 months ago

The abortion issue has nothing at all to do with the sanctity of life. After all, many who abhor abortion see no problem with dropping bombs and white phosphorous on civilians, or torturing people, or even allowing child molesters among their priestly ranks.Rather, it's about power.

0

Corey Williams 5 years, 7 months ago

The funny part is that christian radio and other christian commentators (like Cal "I'm the moral majority" Thomas) are critical of the "idolatry" of catholicism. Or their heathen belief in purgatory. Or their extra books in the bible. Etc, etc. But when they need the numbers to support a cause, they'll include catholics every time."But Democrats want to pick and choose what they like about God and what they don't (Republicans sometimes do this as well in such matters as wealth and materialism)."The best part is that he actually said "sometimes".

0

ChiHawkInKS 5 years, 7 months ago

Fools, everyone knows religion is just a bunch of magic tricks and fairytales

0

mcontrary 5 years, 7 months ago

As usual, religion tries to trump reason and uses coercion to enforce itself.

0

Mimis_friend 5 years, 7 months ago

POCO, I agree with your statement, but must remind you that every religion from Judaism to Islam to Hinduism to whatever floats your boat including Christianity all have "followers, believers, adherents" what ever, that have their own brand of that religion. No one can say they believe the same as the next although they both say they are Christians. This is why the 1930'and 40's German leaders could say they were Christians and kill millions of Jews, gypsies, Muslims and so on. With all the sects in Christianity and all the different points of view, it is as wide a religion as one can imagine.

0

camper 5 years, 7 months ago

Blah Blah Blah. Does anybody actually read Cal's articles? I'd rather watch paint dry.

0

75x55 5 years, 7 months ago

If the message can't be stomached, kill the messenger.Common tactic there, boys, but faulty servants don't invalidate the message.That said, there is a lot of housecleaning that needs doing...

0

barrypenders 5 years, 7 months ago

Just who ain't the Liberals at odds with?

0

Kontum1972 5 years, 7 months ago

hey arch bishop..mb u should clean up the catholic church first before u start pointing fingers u have a quite a few bad onions in your ranks..and.... i am catholic...clean up your house first!i consider molesting a child to be a heinous crime...!

0

Agnostick 5 years, 7 months ago

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

0

invictus 5 years, 7 months ago

Dems to Mexican Catholics; "we don't care what you ignorant peasants believe now fall into line!!"

0

BrianR 5 years, 7 months ago

My cat says "Cal" right before he throws up.

0

POCO 5 years, 7 months ago

It is sad to realize that so many Catholic politicians have chosen to call themselves "ardent Catholics", but to select only those Church teachings that appeal to them. They ignore the teachings of the Church and the warnings of the leaders of the Catholic Church. Catholic's believe in an after-life, so I hope these politicians are prepared to answer for their actions.

0

jaywalker 5 years, 7 months ago

"In 2004, the Archbishop of Boston, Sean O'Malley, stood by a statement he had made the previous year that pro-choice Catholics are in a state of grave sin and cannot take communion properly"Prime example of why I'm no longer catholic. "State of grave sin" for thinking. Lovely. A 'good' catholic would actually have to live like the Pope and be in constant confessional.

0

Confrontation 5 years, 7 months ago

Lucky for us, most Catholics quit that church once they become adults and can make their own choices.

0

75x55 5 years, 7 months ago

"Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception."That's pretty straightforward, exactly to the point. sorry, bmw - most 'American Catholics' aren't actually 'ardent followers'. If that makes them more 'sane', then perhaps they shouldn't try to take on the label of 'catholic'.

0

Marion Lynn 5 years, 7 months ago

So are Catholics now part of the so-called "religious right"?

0

bmwjhawk 5 years, 7 months ago

Sorry, Cal, but the majority of American Catholics are sane and abortion is no longer a litmus test for most voters.This column is crap.

0

igby 5 years, 7 months ago

For a religion that see's Jesus or the Virgin Mary in a burnt piece of toast, I'm betting that they will vote for Obama. However, McCain is a liberal as well and one will be just as clueless as the other regarding Cal's point.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.