Archive for Wednesday, July 11, 2007
‘Phoenix’ follows familiar flight plan
July 11, 2007
Advertisement
Movie
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix **
Get movie listings, reviews, and more at lawrence.com
Harry Potter seems to be living the same school year over and over. And it's starting to wear thin.
The fifth adventure for the teen wizard, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," is another visual marvel, yet it suffers from a problem similar to other sequels this summer: We've seen it all before.
Or at least, we've seen most of it. Sure there are new characters introduced, new perils, new responsibilities for Harry and his pals and new revelations about the kid's early life and connection to the dark Lord Voldemort.
And Harry even has his first kiss.
Those fresh details aside, though, and despite a new director and screenwriter, "Order of the Phoenix" sticks safely and at times monotonously to the Potter formula: Show a bit of Harry's drab summer among his heartless Muggle relations, branch off into a magical interlude, then land him back at Hogwarts School of Wizardry and Witchcraft, where the same old issues resurface - classmate rivalry, teacher trouble and a slow build toward another showdown with Voldemort.
Granted, this is the formula of J.K. Rowling's books, and with fans counting the days until the arrival of the seventh and final novel on July 21, the recipe has served the series well.
A good deal of the charm of the earlier movies results from the baubles the filmmakers have kept in from the books: odd little interactions with Hogwarts' resident ghosts and living portraits, some sports action on the quidditch field, quirky classroom happenings - stuff that doesn't really have much to do with the main story.
In casting aside most of those trappings, director David Yates and screenwriter Michael Goldenberg deliver the shortest Potter movie yet, though "Order of the Phoenix" is the longest novel at 800-plus pages.
The movie gains in momentum but loses a lot of the fun and wonder of previous installments.
An air of calamity hangs over Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) from the outset in "Order of the Phoenix." At the end of his interminable summer, he's attacked by soul-sucking Dementors, then he's expelled from Hogwarts for unauthorized use of magic to drive them off.
Hogwarts headmaster Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) intercedes on Harry's behalf at a Ministry of Magic appeals hearing. But Dumbledore, previously a tender mentor for Harry, distances himself from the youth throughout the school year.
Harry and buddies Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) face the same old tormenting from classmates. But this time it's amplified by scorn for Harry, who is branded a liar for insisting that Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) had returned to physical form during their battle at the end of the last school year.
The magical world is so shaken and divided that the Ministry of Magic assigns repressive teacher Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton) to the Hogwarts staff to keep an eye on Dumbledore and impart her bland, useless, "Ministry-approved" curriculum.
Dolores is all about toeing the line and outlawing original thought, leaving the kids without the knowledge and skills they sense they will need as Voldemort and his stooges close in.
It falls on Harry to organize and instruct volunteers in a gang they name Dumbledore's Army - Hogwarts students who band together to learn how to defend themselves against the dark forces.
One of the most comforting things about the "Harry Potter" movies is how Radcliffe, Watson and Grint have grown into the roles and advanced as performers. No longer awkward, inexperienced children, they nicely project both the camaraderie of best friends and the gravity of youths forced to mature far too soon.
Some returning characters step to the forefront again, notably Harry's godfather, Sirius Black (Gary Oldman, who delivers with passion and wistfulness). As always, Alan Rickman delights as Professor Snape, whose dour disposition and disdain for Harry is explained to a degree.
Staunton dominates the movie with her perky facade and underlying cruelty. She's a perfect pillar of duplicity and self-righteousness whose aims and methods inject a bit of McCarthyism into Hogwarts.
Much of the movie is a setup for things to come and an explanation of things that came before - personal histories, disclosures and prophecies, hints of an unholy bond between Harry and Voldemort.
At times, "Order of the Phoenix" is as dry as studying Latin grammar by rote. A climactic tussle between Harry and Voldemort's forces is among the most impressive visual creations in the "Harry Potter" flicks; yet dramatically, it's mostly another tease in their endless grudge match.
Familiarity is not quite breeding contempt for Harry and his friends and enemies. But it's starting to breed indifference.
More like this
- People in the news 1 comment / June 29, 2007
- 'Goblet of Fire' considered darkest 'Potter' yet October 26, 2005
- Welcome back, Potter June 17, 2003
- Hallowed ground 7 comments / July 27, 2007
- 'Potter' reflects real-life struggle 9 comments / July 19, 2007
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Fear tactics November 27, 2009 · 26 comments
- Anger control November 27, 2009 · 19 comments
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 65 comments
- 3-step approach to health care reform November 27, 2009 · 19 comments
- Car-motorcycle accident blocks traffic near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009 · 12 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 109 comments
- Blog: In My Pants - Come Join The Fun October 13, 2009 · 333 comments
- Letter claims bad conditions at juvenile facility November 27, 2009 · 16 comments
- Kansas Athletics seeks football fans to invest $34M for Gridiron Club November 27, 2009 · 37 comments
- Poll: Have you ever attended school outside the United States? November 25, 2009 · 11 comments
- Kansas Athletics seeks football fans to invest $34M for Gridiron Club November 27, 2009
- Natural scorer: Xavier Henry used to carrying points load November 27, 2009
- Santa arriving in Downtown Lawrence Friday night November 27, 2009
- Kansas Legislature likely to debate judicial nomination process in 2010 session November 25, 2009
- Center of attention: New LAC director acclimates to challenging post November 27, 2009
- Happiest doctors caring for children, elderly November 27, 2009
- KU follows Cal financing game plan November 27, 2009
- Tight credit slows state’s business development November 27, 2009
- NFL roundup: Broncos back on track November 27, 2009
- Where but in Lawrence? November 21, 2009


11 July 2007
at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
auturgy (Anonymous) says…
Boo. This movie is the best one yet.
11 July 2007
at 3:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rodentgirl16 (Anonymous) says…
auturgy,
That's good to hear because I can't wait to see it! I wonder if the movie critics who are saying that the movie is boring have actually read the book. The 5th book is usually most people's least favorite because it does explain so much about the past and foreshadow the future, and its a little “angsty.” I still really enjoyed it though. Now, bring on the 7th book!
13 July 2007
at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
halfgreengirl (Anonymous) says…
I can't believe that someone could write such an anti-Harry Potter review. This is absolutely ridiculous. I saw it on the day it came out and it's just as the rest of the films have been: increasingly more impressive, captivating, and visually stunning than the previous ones. Full of flashbacks, emotional conflict, and the realization of much more direct peril, Order of the Phoenix is, arguably, the best thus far. Happily, that is a phrase I've been able to report about each and every Potter film as they've hit theatres. And that is where I believe J.K. Rowling and the Potter directors have accomplished their goal.
13 July 2007
at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
LittleMissFlea (Anonymous) says…
I've noticed that reviewers that have actually read the book tend to give a lot more positive review, even though they know what's missing. I understand that books and movies are two very different genres, but the movies do compliment the books nicely.
13 July 2007
at 10:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ihatejohntravolta (Laura Watkins) says…
it was good, but it was soooooo confusing for those of us who haven't read the books. i had to get one of my friends to explain some stuff to me after we left. i don't think this movie is the best of the hp movies out so far but it's still pretty good.