Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, February 11, 2007

Kansas colonel says tough road ahead for new leader

February 11, 2007

Advertisement

When Gen. David Petraeus took over last week as commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, he expressed optimism that sectarian and insurgent violence in that country could be ended.

The man who last year led a Kansas Army National Guard battalion in Iraq agrees.

"I think as the Iraqi police get better, things will get better, but it's a tough challenge," Col. James Trafton said during a recent interview.

Trafton, 55, who commanded the 2nd Battalion, 137th Mechanized Infantry Regiment, said the Iraqi Army had improved considerably and was taking over responsibility for more territory from U.S. forces.

"The emphasis has been on the army, and now it's time to get the police trained," he said.

In Iraq

Since the battalion returned from Iraq in November, Trafton has been able to follow the war from the comfort and safety of home. But during his year in Iraq, he saw his soldiers work 12-hour days in 120-degree heat patrolling a rural area on the outskirts of Baghdad, guarding their home base at Camp Slayer, removing improvised explosive devices and providing or assisting with security for important visitors, including top military leaders, Congressional delegations, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney and even President Bush.

He also saw some of the soldiers wounded by bombs, and there was one fatality: Sgt. Jesse Davila of Greensburg. Davila, 29, was killed and others were injured when a suicide bomber drove up to their vehicle. Davila was with the Lawrence-based Company A.

"I was on patrol with my guys when I was called back," Trafton said, recalling that day in late February nearly a year ago. "It's tough. It goes through your mind about what you could have done differently to prevent this. In this case, everybody did exactly what they were trained to do."

There were many close calls with roadside bombs, Trafton said.

"I'd just knock on wood, thank God and pat my chaplain on the back," he said. "We could have lost a lot more."

Security, humanitarian missions

The Lawrence company handled a major share of security duties for Camp Slayer, near Baghdad International Airport. It also served as a quick reaction force. Company C from Wichita handled patrol duties, and Company B, also from Wichita, escorted the dignitaries and operated the Joint Visitor's Bureau for Petraeus' predecessor, Gen. George Casey.

Rumsfeld, who flew to Baghdad several times, was interested in seeing and talking to the soldiers, Trafton said.

"He would drive my guys crazy because he would go from mess hall to mess hall because he wanted to go where the soldiers were," Trafton said.

Despite Rumsfeld's reputation of having a gruff demeanor, Trafton said he found him to be "very personable."

Trafton's battalion also conducted humanitarian missions and worked with Iraqis on $2.5 million worth of infrastructure projects that included repairing sewer and water systems. Those projects take time because of language barriers, he said.

Gen. David Petraeus, right, takes the flag from Gen. John Abizaid, to become U.S. commander in Iraq Saturday in Baghdad. Petraeus took over from Gen. George Casey, who will become the next U.S. Army chief of staff.

Gen. David Petraeus, right, takes the flag from Gen. John Abizaid, to become U.S. commander in Iraq Saturday in Baghdad. Petraeus took over from Gen. George Casey, who will become the next U.S. Army chief of staff.

"You work with Iraqi contractors and they don't speak English," Trafton said. "We had to take interpreters. Sometimes I'd take two interpreters and hope we got it right."

The infrastructure and humanitarian projects result in good relations with Iraqi people, Trafton said. Commanders work with sheiks and religious leaders to get things done, he said. By the time his tour of duty was up, Trafton had built a friendship with a local sheik. The sheik tried to get Trafton to stay by offering one of his many wives.

"I said I don't need another wife," Trafton said with a laugh. "We have only one wife in our country."

On the home front

At their Kansas City-area home, Theresa Trafton communicated regularly with her husband by e-mail and sometimes phone. But she didn't watch the news and didn't want to hear about the Iraq war. She worked in their yard and garden and remodeled a hallway.

"I just tried to keep busy," Theresa Trafton said. The Traftons have four daughters, ages 9 to 30, and four grandchildren.

James Trafton is a full-time Guardsman and a career soldier. He is a Vietnam veteran, where he served with the Army's 1st Cavalry Division. He's earned several service medals as well as Bronze Stars from Vietnam and Iraq.

Trafton follows the war news but won't comment on war conduct policies, such as what specific changes, if any, should be made. And he won't say much about any Iranian influence that might be evident in Iraq.

"There's a lot of stuff showing up from a lot of places," he said.

Memorable return

Trafton won't forget the battalion's "welcome home" greeting in November, when about 3,000 cheering people waited for them to arrive in a convoy of buses at Topeka's Expocentre escorted by the Patriot Guard motorcycle group. Also waiting were Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and Kansas Adjutant General Tod Bunting. He gets emotional talking about it.

"Standing there listening to those people yell - it got to me," he said. "It still does. Part of that is because of Vietnam. They snuck me back into the country. I don't ever want to see that happen again in this country. It's not fair to the soldiers."

After returning from Iraq, Trafton was placed in charge of the Guard's strength management, which oversees recruiting and retention. He considers the new job a challenge but nothing like dealing with the Iraqi heat ("like being in a clothes dryer") or the pressure of being battalion commander in a war zone.

"It's different when you are responsible for people 24 hours a day for an entire year," he said. "You can't just say I'm going to take Sunday off. It doesn't work that way."

Comments

cool 7 years, 2 months ago

hope that USA inc stays long enough to clean up the depleted uranium !

0

cool 7 years, 2 months ago

Excellent Merrill !

the coalition of USA INC & UK INC seemed to exclude others eh ?

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 7 years, 2 months ago

Jeez, dambudzo, I try to get with your program, and see the glass as overflowing rather than shattered on the ground, and you call me negative. How will I ever see how truly wonderful your world is with that sort of "negative" reinforcement?

0

Dambudzo 7 years, 2 months ago

on_the_bus has got to be the most negative poster I have ever seen.

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 7 years, 2 months ago

This is such great news, James. Once Iraqi oil is fully privatized, corruption and all forms of patronage will end, social disruption will be immediately healed, sub-optimal production will suddenly blossom, and the economy will flourish.

I guess W was right. A war for oil is all Iraq needed for utopia to return to Babylon.

0

Dambudzo 7 years, 2 months ago

If it was easy anybody could do it.

0

Jamesaust 7 years, 2 months ago

merrill - this post is one of the clearest peaks into the manner of your psychosis. Rather than wallow in the muck with you, let me just make a point on a sliver of your topic - oil privatization.

Baathist Iraq, like many other Middle Eastern countries, long ago kicked out "foreign" oil companies and took over oil production on a national basis. Advantages: a bigger share of the monies available, more absolute control, a cash cow to serve political ends. Disadvantages: corruption, lack of investment and technology and re-investment, decisions made for non-economic reasons such as jobs, patronage, etc. Result: initial years of gross wealth followed by severe social disruption, sub-optimal production, and (future endgame) economic collapse. Look at any oil producing country in the world and see the curse of such non-productive, 'Paris Hilton-like' wealth. Believe it or not, there are better ways starting with a recognition that government and its bureaucracies are not wiser or more purely motivated than everyone else. If I were to criticize these plans for anything it would be that they aren't a big enough break - the partner remains the government of Iraq not the people of Iraq.

I also note that one "petro-imperialist" you fail to mention is Total of France. Or Statoil of Norway (those Norweign imperialists!!). Or CNOOC of China (don't blow your circuits but can Communists be Imperialists?). But then, claiming that the French, et al., are "war profiteers" and that France is controlled by "Big Oil" doesn't quite jive, so you conveniently leave them out of your babbling conspiracy theory.

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 7 years, 2 months ago

If you don't read any of it, you could be in line to succeed W.

0

oldgoof 7 years, 2 months ago

After I read all of that, where do I file for my 3 semester credit hours?

0

Richard Heckler 7 years, 2 months ago

The odds are tough for the new general:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-10-29-missing-weapons_x.htm

Saudis reportedly funding Iraqi Sunni insurgents http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm

http://www.fas.org/asmp/profiles/saudi_arabia.htm

http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php? option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

The Corporate Occupation of Iraq (December 11, 2006) In light of the Iraq Study Group recommendations and their failure to address the real problems facing Iraq, the author of this TomPaine opinion piece advises that the US end the corporate invasion of Iraq. US companies, which were awarded lucrative contracts by the US government following the 2003 invasion, failed to reconstruct war-torn Iraq as intended. The author concludes that "the Bush administration must abandon its plan to remake Iraq into an economic wonderland for US corporations," and return Iraq to the Iraqi people "to remake as they themselves see fit."

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/reconstructindex.htm

==============================================

The longer we stay the higher the price tag in tax dollars. It is in the economic best interest of the USA to bring this Bush admin war for oil to an end. Should USA and British oil firms privatize Iraq oil the troops will not be allowed to come home per se. This alone is going to cause the breaking up of many family homes. Iraq will likely not be a safe haven to ship families. Reducing Iraq and Afghanistan to rubble is not an acceptable goal.

What follows is a list of some of the worst Iraq war profiteers who have bilked American taxpayers and undermined the military's mission:

No. 1 and No. 2: CACI and Titan No. 3: Bechtel: Precast Profits No. 4: Aegis Defense Services No. 5: Custer Battles No. 6: General Dynamics No. 7: Nour USA Ltd. No. 8, No. 9 and No. 10: Chevron, ExxonMobil and the Petro-Imperialists

Read more here: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/reconstruct/2006/0905profiteers.htm

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/43045/?comments=view&cID=257615&pID=2574112003-04/13du_boff.cfm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4354269.stm

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article2132467.ece

Bring the new General and the troops home STAT!

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.