Archive for Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Network pulls plug on ‘ill-considered’ O.J. book, special

November 21, 2006

Advertisement

— O.J. Simpson's book and TV special were canceled Monday, an astonishing end to an imaginary confession that had sickened the public as the very worst kind of tabloid sensation.

"I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," said Rupert Murdoch, whose News Corp. owns both Fox Broadcasting and publisher HarperCollins. "We are sorry for any pain that this has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson."

"If I Did It," in which Simpson was to have described how he would have killed his ex-wife, had been scheduled to air as a two-part interview Nov. 27 and Nov. 29 on Fox. The book was to have followed on Nov. 30.

HarperCollins spokeswoman Erin Crum said some copies already had been shipped to stores but would be recalled, and all copies would be destroyed.

During an appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live," Fred Goldman, Ron's father, expressed appreciation to those who voiced their opposition to the book and interview.

"We want to say thank you, thank you for everyone in this country who raised their voice and stood up for the right thing," Goldman said.

Earlier, his lawyer Jonathan Polak said: "I think News Corp. finally stepped up, admitted they made a mistake and did the right thing. This is everything we have been asking News Corp. to do for the past two weeks. We want to thank the American people for helping make this happen."

Simpson 'indifferent'

Simpson's attorney, Yale Galanter, said: "We had known for three or four days that this was a possibility."

Galanter said he did not know whether the deal between Simpson and News Corp. was contingent on a TV interview being shown or a book arriving in stores.

"There are only three possible reactions: anger, happiness or indifference. He's totally indifferent about the fact that it's been canceled," said Galanter, who added that he didn't know if Simpson was paid upfront.

Simpson said in a phone interview late Monday he could not comment on the situation "until I know legally where I stand."

He added, "I would like nothing better than to straighten out some things that have been mischaracterized. But I think I'm legally muzzled at this point."

Any hopes of commercial reward were quickly overwhelmed by near universal revulsion to last week's announcement - from those who knew Goldman and Brown, from booksellers and advertisers, even from Fox News Channel personality Bill O'Reilly.

A dozen Fox network affiliates already had said they would not air the two-part sweeps month special, and numerous stores had declined to sell the book or promised to donate any profits to charity.

"I really don't think there would have been very many advertisers who would have been willing to participate in this show," said Brad Adgate of the ad buying firm Horizon Media.

With little advertising, Fox would miss the chance to profit from the show. If there were no advertisers, the show wouldn't even be rated by Nielsen Media Research - so the number of people watching would have done nothing to help Fox's season average, he said.

Setback for publisher, Fox

The cancellation was a stunning setback for ReganBooks - an imprint of HarperCollins - and Judith Regan, who had labeled the book and interview Simpson's "confession." She insisted that she had done it not for money, but as a victim of domestic violence anxious to face down a man she believed got away, literally, with murder.

ReganBooks is known for gossipy best-sellers such as Jose Canseco's "Juiced" and Jenna Jameson's "How to Make Love Like a Porn Star."

The Simpson interview also was a low for Fox, which has long tested viewers with risky reality programming dating back to "When Animals Attack."

O'Reilly had urged a boycott of any company that advertised on the special.

Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of murder in a case that became its own TV drama. The former football star, announcer and actor later was found liable for the deaths in a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by the Goldman family.

The TV special was to air on two of the final three nights of the November sweeps, when ratings are watched closely to set local advertising rates. It has been a particularly tough fall for Fox, which has seen none of its new shows catch on and is waiting for the January bows of "American Idol" and "24."

The closest precedent for such an about-face came when CBS yanked a miniseries about Ronald Reagan from its schedule in 2003 when complaints were raised about its accuracy. It was seen on CBS' sister premium-cable channel, Showtime, instead.

One Fox affiliate station manager said he wasn't going to air the special because he was concerned that, whether or not Simpson was guilty, he'd still be profiting from the murders.

"I have my own moral compass and this was easy," said Bill Lamb, general manager of WDRB in Louisville.

Numerous books have been withdrawn over the years because of possible plagiarism, most recently Kaavya Viswanathan's "How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life," but removal simply for objectionable content is exceptionally rare. In the early 1990s, Simon & Schuster canceled Bret Easton Ellis' "American Psycho," an exceptionally graphic account of a serial killer. The novel was released by Random House Inc. and later made into a feature film.

Sales for "If I Did It," had been strong but not sensational. It cracked the top 20 of Amazon.com last weekend, but by Monday afternoon, at the time its cancellation was announced, the book had fallen to No. 51.

Comments

sublime 8 years, 5 months ago

Anyone that even questions his guilt is a fool.

Linda Endicott 8 years, 5 months ago

Good. At least someone has some common sense.

Linda Endicott 8 years, 5 months ago

Free enterprise is also part of the picture, Marion. If Fox and the publisher don't want to risk it, that's their choice. If O.J. wants to publish the book anyway, let him pay for it himself. Nothing to stop him from it.

Same with the TV interview. I'm sure there's some cable network or station somewhere that would be willing to air it...if he pays for the privilege.

Linda Endicott 8 years, 5 months ago

And besides, this isn't the government ordering them to stop the book or the interview. If it was, you might have a point with the free speech thing. But it's not.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.