LJWorld.com weblogs Congressional Briefing

Wall Street Journal: Boyda turns right to keep seat


The Wall Street Journal [profiles Nancy Boyda][1], suggesting - as the headline says - that she is taking conservative positions in Congress in order to hang onto her (formerly Republican) seat.Kevin Helliker starts off:![][2]Freshman Rep. Nancy Boyda of Kansas recently joined 95 Republican lawmakers signing a letter attacking amnesty for illegal immigrants. She remains opposed to gun control even in the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings. And she touts her credentials as a decades-long Republican.*Today, the 51-year-old Ms. Boyda is a Democrat. But you often wouldn't know it as she gears up to run for re-election in November 2008. With Republicans aggressively attacking her, and two Republicans already seeking her seat, she is positioning herself as independent. She plans to keep the word "Democrat" off her yard signs and rejects assistance from the Democrats' national congressional campaign committee.*Next year's battle for Congress is well under way, even as presidential politics are getting most of the attention. Ms. Boyda's success will help determine whether the Democratic Party can keep control of Congress, and show how firmly it has planted new roots in conservative corners of the country where it made surprising gains last fall -- places like Kansas, Indiana, Kentucky and Texas.Some other highlights from the article:¢ "Following the defeat (in 2004), Ms. Boyda felt called to join the ministry. But after talking with her pastor and the Methodist bishop of Kansas, she concluded that God was calling her instead to make another run for Congress. ... Rep. Boyda says she doesn't wear her religion on her sleeve and doesn't believe God ordained her to win, just to run. She says she believes that inserting religion into government or vice versa hurts both institutions."¢ "The campaign made local newspapers its primary mass-media vehicle. Using their home computer, the Boydas created a 12-page newsletter filled with family photographs and articles outlining the candidate's positions. Then they paid 26 mostly rural newspapers to carry it as an insert in weekday editions, to avoid the clutter of Sunday papers. The cost: just $93,000. "Anybody who thinks that people don't read newspapers anymore doesn't live in a small town," says Mr. Boyda, 62."¢ "She has faced some bare-knuckled attacks as Republicans try to undermine her. In February, press releases from various Kansas Republicans accused the Democratic-led Congress and Rep. Boyda in particular of eliminating funding for capital expenditures at two military bases in Kansas. The accusation prompted newspapers across the state to write editorials attacking the Democratic-led Congress, often singling out Rep. Boyda for criticism. 'Losing this money would have a dramatic impact not only on the bases at Fort Riley and Fort Leavenworth but on the state's economy,' said a Feb. 11 editorial in the Topeka Capital-Journal. ... In fact, the new congress did approve base spending, and the Kansas forts started receiving it this spring. Rep. Boyda won a corrective editorial in the Capital-Journal. 'Turns out, those Republican charges were wrong, not to mention deceptive,' said the paper, whose editorial board had endorsed Mr. Ryun in 2006." [1]: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118126644598528636.html?mod=googlenews_wsj [2]: http://ljworld.com/specials/election04/primary/boyda.jpg


Godot 9 years, 9 months ago

Gotta admit I am very pleasantly surprised by her performance so far. I stand by my criticism that her newspaper inserts were really over the top and full of unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.

jasonc_22 9 years, 9 months ago

Her newspaper inserts, while not exactly what I would have done, were one of the best political publications nationwide in 2006. I never thought I would see anyone read any of it, but the little old ladies in my rural community read them, read them again, and took them to the Senior Center or hairdresser with them. Content could have been better, but as a political tool, they were amazing!

Jamesaust 9 years, 9 months ago

Of course she is - her margin of victory was delivered by registered Republicans. For any candidate, the opinions of the voters providing victory - not the opinions of all voters for a candidate - provide instruction. If partisan Democrats are dissatisfied with her moderation then they can deliver her an extra 10,000 Democrat votes so she doesn't need the Republican ones and her "winning" voter is a Dem.

Besides, Boyda is the nominee precisely because she's moderate enough to have a chance in the district. (The Dems bizarre effort to oust Lieberman in Connecticut last year should provide a lesson.) The question isn't whether she's too right-wing but rather whether she's right-wing enough to survive a re-election attempt.

Godot 9 years, 9 months ago

What really irked me about those newspaper inserts was that they never explained where Boyda stood on issues, nor did they present solutions. All Nancy did was raise questions, sow the seeds of discontent, and stir up fear. Apparently that is the way to get elected, and the Democrats were the ones who got snookered this time.

I wonder if another Republican-turned-Democrat, who won his election on a single issue, will turn out to be a disappointment to his liberal supporters.

jasonc_22 9 years, 9 months ago

i don't think his was a single issue....well, the "Phill Kline is stupid" issue, so maybe just one issue.

james bush 9 years, 9 months ago

Nancy is a pleasant surprise and we could have done worse, i e someone like Pelosi........but the RNC, Ryan, and GW Bush lost the 2006 election for republicans/conservatives.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.