Archive for Sunday, March 11, 2018

DA was more likely to grant a diversion in 2017, but number of people seeking them declined

Criminal diversion applications and other forms hang in a rack on the wall inside the Douglas County District Attorney's Office.

Criminal diversion applications and other forms hang in a rack on the wall inside the Douglas County District Attorney's Office.

March 11, 2018

Advertisement

The Douglas County District Attorney’s Office granted a higher percentage of criminal diversions in 2017 than it did the previous year, according to numbers the office recently released, but the number of people receiving the break did hit a three-year low.

In 2017, the number of diversions the DA’s office granted was 93 percent of the number of diversion applications it received. That’s up from 85 percent in 2016, and about the same as 92 percent in 2015.

District Attorney Charles Branson emphasized that diversions — especially in the felony category — are offered on a case-by-case basis.

He said fluctuations from year to year are mainly due to what cases are charged, how many diversion applications the office receives and unique circumstances of each case.

“It just depends on what cases are charged. Our willingness to offer a diversion in those categories hasn’t changed over the years,” Branson said. “Our review of cases for diversions has been the same as it’s been for the last several years.”

For those reasons, Branson said the percentage of diversions granted can be a more useful figure to look at than the number granted.

The Douglas County DA’s office files roughly 1,500 cases a year, comprising about 800 misdemeanor cases and 700 felony cases, Branson said. Criminal traffic cases are in addition to those, he said.

Branson also noted that his office files less than half of all the cases it receives from law enforcement.

Douglas County District Attorney Charles Branson speaks at a news conference, Friday, Sept. 16, 2016.

Douglas County District Attorney Charles Branson speaks at a news conference, Friday, Sept. 16, 2016.

In 2017, the DA’s office received 254 applications for diversions, denied 25 of them and ultimately granted 237. Branson said the numbers of applications received and denied may not add up to the total number of applications filed in a given year. In some cases, for instance, applications may be approved in the calendar year after they were filed, a diversion may have been withdrawn or the case may have been dismissed for another reason.

Of the 237 diversions granted in 2017, 16 were for felony crimes, 144 were for misdemeanor crimes and 77 were for misdemeanor traffic crimes — which Branson said are primarily DUIs.

In 2016, the DA’s office received 363 applications for diversions, denied 15 of them and ultimately granted 310.

Of the 310 diversions granted in 2016, 19 were for felony crimes, 135 were for misdemeanor crimes and 156 were for traffic offenses.

Branson said the more striking fluctuations in traffic diversions may be attributed to law enforcement grants or special enforcements that result in more traffic cases being charged in certain years than others.

The ACLU has said that higher diversion rates, particularly felony diversions, would help cut down the number of people incarcerated in Douglas County. Critics of the local jail expansion proposal — scheduled for a public vote this spring — have also said granting more diversions would cut down the jail population.

Branson said he disagrees.

“A diversion is a source of conviction avoidance, typically not a source of jail avoidance,” he said, adding that the effect of more diversions on the county jail population would be “negligible, at best."

That’s because the types of cases that are appropriate for diversion often aren’t ones that would carry imprisonment or jail time for convictions, he said.

Felonies that would carry a presumptive prison sentence would not be appropriate for diversion, Branson said. Examples include high-level felonies such as aggravated battery, robbery or many sex crimes.

In lower-level felonies for which diversion can be appropriate, typically those defendants, if convicted, would end up on probation as opposed to imprisoned, Branson said.

The situation is similar for criminal misdemeanor cases, he said. People granted diversions in those cases typically wouldn’t have been headed for jail anyway, but rather more likely have been sentenced to probation.

Branson said his office does grant diversions to people with prior criminal histories in some cases. He said it’s treated on a case-by-case basis as to the relevance of those prior convictions.

Obtaining a diversion is a way for the accused to avoid a criminal conviction, Branson said.

If a defendant’s application for diversion is approved, he or she enters an agreement with the DA to pay court costs, fines and fees, and to complete a behavioral modification program. That program is usually tailored to the circumstances of the case and might include orders to complete things such as drug and alcohol treatment, mental health counseling, anger management classes or batterer intervention training.

If the defendant successfully completes the program as promised in the diversion agreement, the charges are dismissed.

If the defendant fails to complete the diversion, the case is brought back to court and proceeds as a usual criminal case.

To notify defendants about the diversion option, Branson said information is printed on every charging document, and the applications are available online and on the wall in the DA’s office. He said defense attorneys are well aware applying for diversions is an option for their clients, as well.

The cost to apply for a diversion in Douglas County District Court is $100.


Criminal diversions in Douglas County

The following numbers are for diversions in adult criminal cases in Douglas County District Court. Those in the traffic category are primarily DUIs.

2017

Applications received: 254

Applications denied: 25

Diversions granted: 237 (93 percent)

Felony crimes: 16

Misdemeanor crimes: 144

Misdemeanor traffic crimes: 77

2016

Applications received: 363

Applications denied: 15

Diversions granted: 310 (85 percent)

Felony crimes: 19

Misdemeanor crimes: 135

Misdemeanor traffic crimes: 156

2015

Applications received: 297

Applications denied: 11

Diversions granted: 274 (92 percent)

Felony crimes: 34

Misdemeanor crimes: 130

Misdemeanor traffic crimes: 110

Note: Diversion applications received and denied do not necessarily equal total diversion agreements filed. Diversion may have been withdrawn or the case may have been dismissed for other reasons, or applications may not have been finalized at time of count.

Source: Douglas County DA

Contact public safety reporter Sara Shepherd
Have a tip or story idea?
More coverage: Douglas County votes on jail expansion, behavioral health campus
• April 24, 2018 — A look at what is included in the proposed Douglas County Jail expansion

• April 23 — Americans for Prosperity campaigning against sales tax in county referendum

• April 22 — At forum, Douglas County commissioner explains 'what if' option if sales tax referendum fails

• April 22 — Get ready to vote: Questions and answers on the Douglas County half-cent sales tax ballot question

• April 22 — 4,198 days in: Meet the Douglas County Jail’s 5 longest residents

• April 20 — County says Justice Matters using wrong law to try to force mental health vote; group plans to start petition drive on Saturday

• April 18 — Douglas County leaders learn about first participant in diversion program for female inmates; Thellman cites Constitution on jail expansion issue

• April 17 — Average daily population at Douglas County Jail fell slightly in 2017 to reverse 5-year trend

• April 17 — Douglas County counselor: Meeting with Justice Matters about proposed petition would not be appropriate

• April 17 — Despite campaign literature to the contrary, county officials confirm there’s no legal finding that Douglas County Jail must be expanded

• April 16 — Douglas County legal counselor finds proposed Justice Matters petition legally invalid, but group says it can be fixed

• April 16 — What you will see and hear on a Douglas County Jail tour

• April 15 — Speakers at criminal justice, behavioral health forum look beyond jail expansion, crisis center

• April 14 — County-funded training expands number of peer-support specialists to share ‘been there, got better’ message

• April 11 — Criminal justice group’s spokeswoman says expanding Douglas County Jail would contribute to nation’s mass incarceration problem

• April 9 — Douglas County Commission may be forced to put new mental health, tax plan on November ballot

• March 25 — Increasing population at Douglas County jail at odds with national trend

• March 22 — Advocacy group forms to support county referendum on jail expansion, behavioral health initiatives

• March 21 — Douglas County District Court chief judge defends court’s processes, agrees serious felony crime is increasing

• March 12 — County’s pretrial release, home-arrest programs diverting large numbers from jail, but not enough to prevent overcrowding

• March 11 — DA was more likely to grant a diversion in 2017, but number of people seeking them declined

• March 6 — Douglas County Sheriff’s Office offering jail tours, presentations in advance of spring referendum

• March 5 — Online behavioral health care site available free to county residents pending referendum outcome

• March 4 — Felonies, not pot smoking, filling up the Douglas County Jail, new report says

• March 3 — Activist groups kick off their campaign against jail expansion

• March 1 — Town Talk: Here comes the opposition: Four groups join forces to campaign against Douglas County jail expansion

• Feb. 21 — Douglas County will face tough choices on jail expansion if tax referendum fails, official says

• Feb. 20 — Building jail expansion in phases would take 16 years, $6M to $8M a year, county says

• Feb. 19 — Town Talk: Fact checking county commissioners on assertion that big budget cuts will come if voters reject jail/mental health sales tax

• Feb. 17 — Activist leaders blast proposed expansion of Douglas County Jail

• Feb. 12 — As voters consider $44M expansion, report finds some changes could reduce overcrowding at Douglas County Jail

• Feb. 7 — Douglas County Commission to schedule forums on jail and mental health referendum, provide information on what happens if voters reject

• Feb. 4 — Johnson County built a larger jail and now has 300 unused beds; Douglas County can't use them

• Jan. 30 — State law won't allow Douglas County commissioners to campaign for passage of jail, mental health sales tax

• Jan. 24 — Douglas County Commission approves language for ballot question on jail expansion, behavioral health campus

• Jan. 22 — Following the money: Douglas County partners beefing up behavioral health services with funding

• Jan. 17 — Douglas County Commission agrees to put jail expansion, behavioral health campus on same ballot question

• Jan. 16 — Town Talk: Many residents want to vote separately on jail, mental health projects; there's a way, but county unlikely to go there

• Jan. 16 — Douglas County commissioners ready to ask voters to approve jail expansion, behavioral health initiatives

• Jan. 15 — 2014 speedy trial redefinition clogging Douglas County jail, district court

• Jan. 10 — Price tag of behavioral health campus, services estimated at $5.76 million annually

• Jan. 8 — No insurance and hooked on drugs? Chances are, you won't find treatment in Douglas County

• Jan. 5 — Town Talk: A look at how high Lawrence's sales tax rate would be if voters approve increase for jail, mental health

• Jan. 3, 2018 — Due to misunderstanding, county now says jail expansion, mental health projects must be on same sales tax ballot

• Dec. 31, 2017 — Undersheriff says 2016 annual report shows overcrowding threatening jail safety, re-entry programming

• Dec. 18 — Behavioral health campus plan grew from recognition of housing's role in crisis recovery

• Dec. 13 — Services that will be part of behavioral health campus to be introduced next month at LMH

• Dec. 13 — Douglas County commissioners confident of voter buy-in on jail expansion plan

• Nov. 30 — Douglas County commission agrees to move ahead with $44 million jail expansion design

• Nov. 26 — Sheriff's Office exploring modular units as stopgap solution to Douglas County Jail overcrowding

• Nov. 8 — Douglas County Sheriff's Office recommends jail redesign that would more than double number of beds

• Oct. 4 — Jail expansion, crisis center would require public vote on new taxes, officials say

• Sept. 20 — Estimated cost to expand Douglas County Jail jumps by millions of dollars

• July 26 — Douglas County Commission to forward report on future jail population to architects

• July 16 — Double bunking not considered solution for Douglas County Jail overcrowding

• June 26 — Jail, mental health initiatives help drive proposed tax increase in 2018 county budget

• May 14 — Douglas County data showing swelling jail population despite fewer arrests

• April 5, 2017 — Sheriff urges Douglas County Commission to make jail expansion a priority

Comments

Steve Jacob 1 month, 2 weeks ago

How much does a diversion cost to file. Fees and extra lawyer cost?

Francis Hunt 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The article says the fee is $100. Who knows what lawyers charge that's up to each individual lawyer.

Benet Magnuson 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Hi Sara Shepherd, Did you find any information for why the number of felony diversions has fallen so much (more than 75%) in Douglas County since fiscal year 2012? Here are the Douglas County numbers from the Office of Judicial Administration (http://www.kscourts.org/Court-Administration/stats/index.html):

Fiscal Year / Number Felonies Diverted / Total Felony Dispositions / Percent Felonies Diverted

2012 68 504 13%

2013 58 519 11%

2014 37 436 8%

2015 36 416 9%

2016 29 514 6%

2017 15 569 3%

Commenting has been disabled for this item.

loading...