Archive for Saturday, April 21, 2018

Opinion: The Senate must confirm Pompeo as secretary of state

April 21, 2018

Advertisement

— For the first time in the history of the republic, it appears increasingly likely that a majority of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will vote against the president’s nominee for secretary of state. If this happens, it would be a black mark not on Mike Pompeo’s record, but on the reputation of this once-storied committee.

There are no instances of a secretary of state nominee ever receiving an unfavorable committee vote since such votes were first publicly recorded in 1925 (before that, the committee voted in closed session). Democrat John Kerry was approved in a unanimous voice vote, including from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who opposes Pompeo. Democrat Hillary Clinton was approved 16 to 1, despite concerns about foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation. Madeleine Albright was approved unanimously, with the strong support of my former boss, the committee’s conservative then-chairman, Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., who called Albright “a tough and courageous lady” and voted for her despite saying that she was “sincerely wrong” in some of her foreign policy views.

Other Democrats, including Warren Christopher and Cyrus Vance, were also approved unanimously in committee, as were Republicans Colin Powell, James Baker and George Shultz. Indeed, no secretary of state going all the way back to Henry Kissinger had ever received more than two negative votes in the Foreign Relations Committee — until Donald Trump became president.

Last year, all 10 Democrats on the committee voted “no” to Rex Tillerson’s nomination, making him the first secretary of state in history to be approved on a party-line vote. Now, thanks to the opposition from those 10 Democrats and Paul, it appears that Pompeo could soon become the first secretary of state nominee in history to receive a negative recommendation from the committee.

There is simply no excuse for this. There are no ethical questions hanging over Pompeo’s nomination. He has engaged in no disqualifying personal conduct. And no one questions that he is extraordinarily qualified for the job. Indeed, Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., said that Pompeo “has a clear record of public service to his nation — in uniform, in Congress, and as the director of the CIA.” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said he believes that Pompeo “will work hard to restore morale at State and work to supplement, not atrophy, the diplomatic tools at the Secretary of State’s disposal.” Yet both are voting against him. Indeed, nine of the committee’s 10 Democrats have already declared their opposition to Pompeo — including two, Tim Kaine, D-Va., and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., — who voted for him to lead the CIA.

Their opposition comes just as President Trump is preparing for a high-stakes nuclear summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Pompeo recently returned from North Korea, where he met with Kim and laid the groundwork for this historic meeting. Democrats ought to ask themselves how their actions will be seen in Pyongyang. To deliver such an undeserved rebuke to Pompeo at such a critical diplomatic moment would be a shameful abdication of the committee’s responsibilities.

It would also breach two centuries of precedent in which the committee has carefully examined the credentials and qualifications of the president’s nominee for secretary of state but acknowledged that the president should have his choice of who should be his chief diplomatic adviser. It is one thing for senators to use a nomination as leverage to gain commitments on specific policy matters. (Helms insisted that Albright work with him on his plans to reform the United Nations and reorganize the State Department, which she did.) Effective senators understand how to use the nomination process to win policy fights. But for senators to vote down a highly qualified nominee over their disdain for the president is completely unwarranted and, quite frankly, a breach of Senate norms.

A negative vote would hurt the Foreign Relations Committee more than Pompeo. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., will bring his nomination to the floor regardless of what the committee does, and it is expected that some Democrats — such as Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., who has publicly announced her support — will vote for him. And when Pompeo is confirmed by the full Senate, he would be more than justified in determining that the State Department is best served by working closely with the appropriators and Senate leadership, and bypassing a committee that can’t make policy, can’t legislate and can’t lead.

— Marc Thiessen is a columnist for Washington Post Writers Group.

Comments

Ken Lassman 1 month ago

Rejecting Mike Pompeo's nomination will not be because of his abilities and experience; I think it's safe to say that the Foreign Relations Committee is quite likely to reject Pompeo on Monday as a clear vote of No Confidence for what Trump has already done to the State Department and shows clear evidence of continuing under the tutelage of Mike Pompeo. Nobody on this Committee has been happy with the large scale dismantlement of our network of diplomats around the world that started with Tillerson, and they are right. Why would any country be interested in strengthening their ties with the US, when we just pulled out staff and leadership that was an important resource for that country? Our edge over other diplomatic corps from other countries was based on our own in-depth understanding of and relationship with that country in ways that helped that country stay democratic and economically healthy.

Trump's international policies can be seen as nothing less than the US's wholesale retreat from the world stage. Japan is stepping up to fill the void in the far east, Russia has stepped up to the plate in the Middle East and Europe, China is doing the same thing practically everywhere you look, and the EU is deciding where to place its influences. Sadly, Trump's silver spoon spoiled child upbringing and ADHD has created this crisis for our country, which in some domestic areas, has at least been mitigated by professional leadership stepping up to the plate to help take up the slack. But because the State Department has been so quickly dismantled, this strategy can't be put into place and the US's leadership worldwide has been sliding down unchecked.

The upcoming vote of no confidence is a direct vote against Trump and it's interesting to note that it is bipartisan. The only question for me is whether this bipartisan vote of no confidence is just the first vote of this kind, culminating in the eventual vote by the entire Senate during a future impeachment proceedings.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.