Archive for Friday, October 20, 2017

Retrial for suspect in shotgun robberies, dog killing again ends in hung jury; third trial planned

The Douglas County Judicial and Law Enforcement Center, 111 E. 11th St.

The Douglas County Judicial and Law Enforcement Center, 111 E. 11th St.

October 20, 2017

Advertisement

For a second time, a jury has failed to agree on whether a man who allegedly wielded a shotgun and killed a dog in a string of early-morning street robberies is guilty.

A retrial for Pierre Walker, 20, ended with a hung jury Friday in Douglas County District Court, according to Jill Spurling, trial assistant for Douglas County District Attorney Charles Branson.

The trial — as did Walker’s first jury trial in July — lasted a week.

Jurors began deliberating Thursday afternoon, returned to deliberations the next morning and announced their decision Friday afternoon.

A third trial for Walker has been scheduled for Jan. 22, according to the DA’s office.

Pierre Walker

Pierre Walker

Walker was charged July 11, 2016, with three counts of aggravated robbery and one count of cruelty to animals, all felonies. According to the charging document, on June 6, 2016, Walker allegedly was armed with a shotgun when he stole property from three people.

The three victims previously testified that they were out walking around 5 that morning at different locations in southwest Lawrence when they were robbed at gunpoint. In one case, one of the robbers shot and killed a dog named Phoebe as her owner was taking her for her usual morning walk.

Lawrence police said the robberies took place southeast of Hy-Vee at 3504 Clinton Parkway, near the Holcom Sports Complex at 2700 W. 27th St. and in the 1500 block of West 27th Street — where the dog was shot to death.

This photo provided by Lawrence police shows a small SUV thought to be associated with three men who were being sought in connection with three armed robberies Monday, June 6, 2016. A shotgun was used in each of the robberies, police said.

This photo provided by Lawrence police shows a small SUV thought to be associated with three men who were being sought in connection with three armed robberies Monday, June 6, 2016. A shotgun was used in each of the robberies, police said.

Three suspects in a small SUV allegedly committed the crime spree, though — between the darkness of the early hour and the sudden nature of the attacks — none of the victims was able to provide a complete description of any of the men who robbed them.

Walker is the only person who was charged in the incident, according to the DA’s office.

Lawrence police connected Walker with the robbery spree after an unrelated crime was reported in Kansas City, Kan.

Detectives testified in Walker’s first trial that items linked to the robberies were found in Walker’s Kansas City home. Those included a sawed-off shotgun, a bag containing shotgun shells matching one left by the dog’s body and one victim’s driver’s license and credit card. Prosecutor Eve Kemple said other evidence that linked Walker to the crimes included Facebook messages and a locator feature on one victim’s stolen cell phone.

Defense attorney Michael Clarke, however, argued at the first trial that there was not enough evidence to find Walker guilty. He cited, for instance, that Walker’s fingerprints were not found on the suspect vehicle, and that there was a lack of proof that Walker actually lived in the house where the aforementioned items were found.

A shotgun shell found by Phoebe’s body and the gun found in the house police identified as Walker’s were tested for fingerprints and DNA, but neither resulted in sufficient evidence to link items to a particular person, according to testimony given during the first trial by Lawrence police representatives.

Walker was arrested in July 2016 in Wyandotte County on unrelated charges. He was transferred to the Douglas County Jail in January of this year, and has been in custody here throughout both trials.

Contact public safety reporter Sara Shepherd
Have a tip or story idea?

Comments

Louis Kannen 1 month, 2 weeks ago

( "Detectives testified in Walker’s first trial that items linked to the robberies were found in Walker’s Kansas City home." ) then later ( "Defense attorney Michael Clarke, however, argued ~ that there was a lack of proof that Walker actually lived in the house where the aforementioned items were found." ) Was there no indication of presumably how the initial "Detectives" were mistaken as to identifying Mr Walker's home?? Did anybody even ask?? And even if it actually wasn't his "home" but rather only where he was staying, what prompted the "Detectives" to end up there in the first place...??? Makes me wonder if there even had been an actual 'confession' on the part of Mr Walker, would that have given either 'Jury' the proverbial 'Clue' as to his obvious involvement.... hello??? ??

Commenting has been disabled for this item.

loading...