Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, March 10, 2013

K.I.D.S matching-grant tuition program comes under fire

March 10, 2013

Advertisement

— For the past year, Terri Friedline, an associate professor at Kansas University, has conducted research about college savings for low-income families, and how this changes the expectations that kids have for themselves and for their futures.

Last week, Friedline explained her research and that of the Assets and Education Initiative at the School of Social Welfare to the Kansas House General Government Budget Committee, which was considering a bill that would abolish the Kansas Investment in Developing Scholars (K.I.D.S.) program.

K.I.D.S. is a matching-grant program established in 2006 that encourages qualifying families to save by matching funds dollar-for-dollar, up to $600 per year. The money may be used for tuition, books, rent or any other approved expense. There is a maximum of 1,200 accounts allotted, and there are 988 in use this fiscal year.

“Encouraging college savings capitalizes on the aspirations of low-income children and changes their assessment of their futures,” Friedline said. “If you want to help students think about going to college, you give them a savings account. If you want them to save in the account, then you provide a match.”

But Scott Gates, who administers the program, said that while the state Treasurer thinks K.I.D.S. is an important incentive for people who use it, it is hard to ask taxpayers to fund it. According to the fiscal note that accompanies the bill, abolishing the program has the potential to save the state up to $720,000 in fiscal year 2014.

Gates also said the Treasurer would prefer for the program to be eliminated rather than forcing the state to decide to fund it one year and not the next. “We have to explain this to people each year,” Gates said.

During the hearing on House Bill 2317 on Thursday, Rep. Mark Kahrs, R-Wichita, said he had concerns that the program was being “gamed” by participants, who may enroll in college and then drop out to receive the total refund into their personal accounts.

Gates said he was not sure if this was happening, because while the state could pay the tuition bill directly to the college for the student, it could not receive the refund if a student were to drop out.

“It is probably an assumption that is consistent with other concerns about providing assistance to low-income families,” Friedline said. “There is this concern about fraud. I can’t speak to specifics about how often it occurs, but I would imagine if you wanted to game the system, there would be other, easier ways to go about it.”

Rep. Pete DeGraaf, R-Mulvane, asked Gates if program participants go deeper into debt as a result of starting the savings process but also having to take out student loans.

Gates said he did not have the data to know how often that situation occurred.

Another committee member questioned whether the families who qualify for the program were actually in need of the funds provided by the state.

“If this bill doesn’t pass, it would be for 2013, a family of four could qualify who earns $47,100,” said Rep. Virgil Peck, R-Tyro. “In some part of Kansas, that’s not that bad of a living at all.”

Along with Friedline, the United Way of Greater Kansas City, Kansas Action for Children and United Community Services of Johnson County opposed the elimination of the program.

The committee will work on the bill this coming week.

Comments

question4u 1 year, 9 months ago

Sorry, this program has two strikes against it: it promotes education and it is intended to help low-income Kansans.

This is not consistent with the House agenda. Sure, no one wants to prevent the poor from attending college, but the people who need the state's help are the poor (well, not literally) members of the Kansas Chamber of Commerce. Our fine legislators are finally seeing that these long suffering individuals are getting the help that they need. It sounds great to give poor families incentives to save for college, but if the state continues to do that then something's got to give. How can the state let corporations have a free ride when it comes to income taxes if Kansas continues to cling to the antiquated notion that government is "of the people, by the people, for the people"? The new Kansas is of, by, and for the Kansas Chamber of Commerce, so it's best to stamp out K.I.D.S right now.

( A word to the wise of the Kansas House though. Your brilliant ideas will go over a little smoother if you give Virgil Peck a Happy Meal to keep his big mouth and tiny mind occupied before the press start taking notes. In fact, a round of Happy Meals for most members of the House might be a good idea.)

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 9 months ago

Exactly-- this legislature is only concerned with promoting plutocracy, and education promotes social mobility, which works directly against the entrenchment of a plutocratic overclass.

Armstrong 1 year, 9 months ago

Sounds like the loop holes need to be closed. Good program.

Norm Jennings 1 year, 9 months ago

So for years the conservative mantra was to give a hand-up rather than a hand-out. Yet this was before the State of Koch had elected their minions of mindless puppets. The mantra now is the same or worse than the previous liberal plantation mindset of have and have-nots. Don't we all remember that good 'ol system where a group could manipulate the masses in return for their fish every day rather than teaching those people to fish for themselves for a lifetime? Now it is the republicans who fear that a dangerous free-thinking opposition to their right-wing brown-shirts (Brownback-shirts?) could foment.

Heaven forbid!

Please, please somebody with name recognition (either party) please give us an alternative for these goons!

I swear I'll vote for a literal donkey if necessary!

Commenting has been disabled for this item.