Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, August 4, 2013

KU geologists drill down for deeper understanding of Ogallala Aquifer

August 4, 2013

Advertisement

Scientist Greg Ludvigson, talks about one of the research vehicles that recovers sediment sample core's for the Kansas Geological Survey, as recently scientists have been in western Kansas collecting some samples of the Ogallala aquifer as tubes of sediment give geologists some idea of age and make up of the high plains aquifers and water tables.

Scientist Greg Ludvigson, talks about one of the research vehicles that recovers sediment sample core's for the Kansas Geological Survey, as recently scientists have been in western Kansas collecting some samples of the Ogallala aquifer as tubes of sediment give geologists some idea of age and make up of the high plains aquifers and water tables.

In a dark, dank room on Kansas University’s West Campus, you can find some of the best-kept, hard-won and most thoroughly analyzed mud in the state of Kansas.

The room houses row after row of meterlong tubes, which resemble the long fluorescent light bulbs of office buildings, but they are a translucent, super-hard plastic, fatter than bulbs, and the stuff inside has known only the dark of underground, until now.

Each tube holds a meterlong piece of a sample from the sediment below Harvey County in central Kansas. Each tells a small part of the story of not only geologic history but also, scientists hope, the future of the subterranean water system on which the region’s economy, farmers and communities depend.

The filling in some tubes is so fine and sandy it looks as if it was taken from a beach. And in some sense, it was. Ancestral rivers to modern river systems in central and western Kansas dumped the sand onto the plains hundreds of thousands or even millions of years ago.

Greg Ludvigson, a sedimentary geologist with the Kansas Geological Survey, points to a tube holding a heavy granular sand, with bright auburn grains mixed in with browns and grays. “That’s almost something you could put in an aquarium,” Ludvigson said.

Fish might like that sort of sediment, but humans do, too, whether they realize it or not. Water moves more easily through grainy sediment, which makes the wells above it more productive.

Unearthing the Ogallala

It takes a geologist to glean much knowledge from mud, sand and rock. Two years into a five-year project, Ludvigson and the survey team can already tell us more than we have ever known about the layers of earth that house aquifers in the state.

This vertically preserved sample of sediment, which the team calls a “core” sample, was taken from the Ogallala Aquifer, a massive underground water system stretching from Nebraska to Texas.

The Ogallala is hugely important to the economy and communities of the Midwest. Farmers have long tapped it to irrigate their crops. As corn, a very water-needy crop, has gained popularity among farmers because of its market value, the Ogallala has been under more pressure than ever.

In 2012 the aquifer’s water tables in Kansas dropped by three and a half feet, the second highest dip on record. With the the depletion rate so much higher than what nature can replenish through the precipitation cycle, parts of the aquifer could be tapped out in fewer than 25 years.

But such projections are not as precise as they could be. They are based on a limited understanding of the sediment that houses the underground reservoir. Ludvigson notes that previous studies have used techniques that smash up the sediment in the process of extracting it. Extrapolating from broken sediment yields results with high margins of error. And that adds vagueness to those very important projections about the Ogallala’s ability to produce water.

That’s where Ludvigson and the Kansas Geological Survey team come in. Using two drills, they have been able to extract preserved core samples from central and southwestern Kansas. The drills, great gear-filled mechanical beasts that vaguely resemble oil rigs, were imported from Europe because the technology isn’t produced anywhere in the U.S. To give you an idea of the kind of sophisticated technology needed to get a core sample, one of the drills uses sonic vibrations to help cut through the deepest layers of sediment, which helps keep them intact.

Two big drills

The difficulty and expense of doing this is why it hasn’t been done before. It’s also why our understanding of the Ogallala and other aquifers in the plains region is so incomplete. As Ludvigson puts it, “The point of doing a core sample is to stop guessing and start knowing.”

Extracting core samples is a time-, labor- and money-intensive endeavor. The team began drilling the Harvey sample in 2011 and has come away with 98 meters, with 100 feet of harder rock left to go. They have a multimillion-dollar budget, cobbled together from the survey’s budget plus grants from the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the National Science Foundation and the Kansas Water Office. All of that to produce five or six core samples, which Ludvigson says is a pretty good start.

Drilling is not where the labor and expense end. From there, the team has, as Ludvigson says, “thrown the kitchen sink” at the samples it has collected. They ran the sediment through a battery of tests to analyze everything they could think of and afford: isotope records, calcium carbonates, gamma radiation and signs of weathering during the sediment’s life.

From all these tests, researchers can learn about the layers of earth, where they came from and how old they are, as well as the composition down to the finest detail. All this goes to providing an incredibly precise description of the sediment’s layers that researchers can then compare to samples from other areas.

Gleaning knowledge

Already, the team has made important findings about the state’s aquifer system. Along with the Harvey sample, the team extracted most of a core from Haskell County in southwestern Kansas, an area most had assumed was part of the Ogallala, though an especially low-flowing section of it.

But the survey team found a problem with that assumption. Their samples found that the age of that sediment was tens of millions of years older than everyone thought, meaning that it probably couldn’t have been formed at the same time as the Ogallala. By getting a precise gauge on the core’s age, the team found that the sediment from Haskell might belong to a completely different water system, the White River Group that extends to Nebraska.

These are all fairly big discoveries in the world of geology and hydrology. More modest discoveries found through comparing samples can yield a more detailed picture of the sedimentary makeup of the aquifers under the plains and how it all connects. That information can then be used to make more accurate and specific predictions about the Ogallala and aquifers under the Great Plains.

The promise of the research is that it can be of direct use to water managers and farmers in central and western Kansas. Understanding the Ogallala more deeply can lead to better decisions about pumping from it. Or so Ludvigson and his fellow geologists hope.

Comments

Les Blevins 8 months, 2 weeks ago

KU geologists are drilling for an understanding of Ogallala Aquifer, but are doing so with no intention of finding a way to fix the draw down problem for the benefit of Kansas residents nor anyone else…

KU being under the management the Republican legislature, which in turn is under the management of the Koch brothers, will only allow KU to study global warming and more local issues such as the Ogallala Aquifer and will not allow any solutions to be developed. This is why when I wanted to tell KU’s leaders about a new concept in distributed energy they would only let me talk to geologists in Learned Hall and when the geologists figured out that what I had to offer was designed for and would likely be disruptive of the fossil fuel industry they immediately turned their backs on me and suddenly refused to hear any more about it. What I proposed to the KU geologists contained within it a solution to the “unsolvable” Ogallala draw down problem in that it would enable our Western Kansas farmers to switch to less water dependent crops known as switchgrass and miscanthus and would create a growing market for those drought tolerant energy crops. What I proposed would also be a solution to the coal-fired generation issue that Sunflower Electric Power is pushing in that it would not entail a central coal-burning plant but instead would provide a means of distributing that generation among Western Kansas communities which in turn would be a means of winding down the exodus of people from those towns and cities. I have a neighbor who is from Wakeeney Kansas and his wife tells me the conditions there have been simply terrible due to the extended drought.

0

Garth Atchison 8 months, 2 weeks ago

Just wait until the natural gas dudes start fraking the area around the aquifer. As if a depleted resource isn't bad enough, we will have competing industries fighting over a dwindling aquifer that we all need for drinking water.

0

Mike Ford 8 months, 2 weeks ago

there is no water there to be diverted. since the Europeans came and the Kiowa, Cheyenne, Arapaho, and Comanche were ejected from the area via theft the order of nature has been upended and now some geniuses are wanting to use what water that's left for irrigation and coal plants. Kansas is soooo genius.

0

fmrl 8 months, 2 weeks ago

I recently read about a 200' diameter, 90' deep sinkhole which occurred in Wallace County. I wonder if this is related to the depletion of the aquifer and if more of the same can be expected.

0

Les Blevins 8 months, 2 weeks ago

Consider; “Climate change is a growing and pressing problem. It is now clear that if we continue on our current path, we run the risk of dramatic disruptive changes to our climate in the lifetimes of our children and our grandchildren. At the same time, we face immediate threats to our economy, our national security that stem from our dependence on oil,” ~Secretary Steven Chu

Consider; Whenever we opt to change our energy mix there will be winners and losers - and I see the ones with the most to lose lining up with various other climate deniers in opposition to change that I think has already become a moral obligation.

Consider; We may need to solve some problems not by removing the cause but by designing the way forward even if the cause remains in place. – (Edward de Bono) de Bono points out that the term “problem solving” implies that there is a single problem to respond to, and that it can be resolved. That doesn’t take into account situations where there is really no problem at all, where a large and/or complex problem exists that cannot be completely resolved no matter what is done (like global warming and climate change) and situations where many problems exist that could be dealt with at once, but many still perceive themselves to be benefitting from the old order.

0

JSpizias 8 months, 2 weeks ago

This article illustrates vividly the stupidity of growing food grains to produce ethanol. A thee and a half foot drop in the aquifer in 2012 means that the "ethanol from corn" party will soon be over. Moreover, converting biomass to fuel is no solution. Patzek and Pimentel have shown the stupidity of this approach in their paper on Thermodynamics of Energy Production from Biomass. A sensible energy policy would be based on conservation and use of methane and nuclear power for generation of electricity. Examine the data on the relative amount of time wind turbines generate electricity. There have to be means of generating electricity when the turbines are not generating it. Review some of the data available from the US Energy Information Administration on current sources of energy. www.eia.gov/

>

http://www.oilcrisis.com/patzek/ThermodynamicsEnergyFromBiomass.pdf Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24, 327-364, 2005. footnote 64: We want to be very clear: solar cells, wind turbines, and biomass-for-energy plantations can never replace even a small fraction of the highly reliable, 24-hours-a-day, 365-days-a-year nuclear, fossil, and hydroelectric power stations. Claims to the contrary are popular, but irresponsible. To the extent that we live in a hydrocarbon-limited world, generate too much CO2, and major hydropower opportunities have been exhausted worldwide, new nuclear power stations must be considered.".....

2

Paul R Getto 8 months, 2 weeks ago

Water management? We don't need no stinking management. Pump her dry.

2

Keith 8 months, 2 weeks ago

"The team began drilling the Harvey sample in 2011 and has come away with 98 meters, with 100 feet of harder rock left to go."

Just being picky here, but why mix meters and feet measurements in the same sentence? So they have 30.5 meters to go. Or they've already drilled 321.5 feet with 100 feet to go.

3

Robert Rauktis 8 months, 2 weeks ago

Great! My tax dollars at work: I subsidize Monsanto corn production to inflate that commodity market which makes our people fat; feeds China via pigs; and depletes an aquifer to grow a wetland crop. Why the free market isn't. And economy isn't a science, but a bad guess.

2

Commenting has been disabled for this item.