Advertisement

Archive for Friday, April 26, 2013

Letter: Election defense

April 26, 2013

Advertisement

To the editor:

Andres Oppenheimer hurts his own case. In his column in the April 20 Journal-World on the recent Venezuelan election, his omission of key facts and one-sided presentation leaves him with little credibility on the subject. Leaving aside the fact that he simply got the percentages wrong, he neglected to mention that because the vote was close, Venezuelan electoral law required an automatic recount of 54 percent of the vote. A recount of 10 percent of the ballot boxes would have been enough to evaluate, statistically, the validity of the election, and 54 percent is a great excess.

Venezuela has a model electoral system, widely praised as one of the fairest and most transparent in the world by organizations such as the Carter Center. When one votes, the vote is tabulated electronically and the voting machine produces a paper record of the vote. In the recount, paper votes are counted by independent observers and compared with the electronic results. The recount confirmed the electronic result that Maduro won by 262,000 votes. The National Electoral Commission and Supreme Court ruled that a recount of the remaining 46 percent of the vote was not necessary because it would not change the result. They have subsequently agreed to an audit of the remaining 46 percent (a fact somehow omitted by Oppenheimer).

Space does not permit a point-by-point refutation of Oppenheimer’s contentions, but suffice it to say that Maduro has been recognized as president by nearly all of the nations of Latin America and the presidents of 17 Latin American countries attended his inauguration.

Comments

Richard Heckler 1 year, 4 months ago

Computerized voting is a crap shoot.... sort of. Computers can be programmed to vote wrong all day long.

And owners of these electronic voting devices in the USA contribute heavily to right wing politics.

I say America vote out computerized voting for the hackers enjoy controlling our votes wayyyy more than we know. Not only that computers don't always work ..... just sometimes go down for no apparent reason.

Protecting Democracy with electronic voting = risky business.

2

rtwngr 1 year, 4 months ago

Merrill, you have two recurring themes. The blame/fault lies with rich people and the "right wing" and spending more money will fix whatever is wrong.

0

oldbaldguy 1 year, 4 months ago

Venezuela will implode at some point as will Cuba.

0

kansanbygrace 1 year, 4 months ago

The Venezuelan electoral system is a remarkably accurate and accountable system, mostly developed by a Florida company, Smartmatic. It does generate a paper copy which can be used to check the electronic tally. In the last several elections, international inspectors from virtually every credible oversight agency, including the Carter center's, mentioned above, have examined the system and give it far better marks than any State in the USA has so far earned.

Oppenheimer has parroted every single criticism and insult that has been leveled at the Venezuelan government for the last 15 years. He's a Miami naysayer who has criticized every democratic move in Honduras, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, etc., etc. He opines, he does not investigate nor report.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.