Topeka The principle that all Kansans, regardless of where they live in the state, have equal representation is a fantasy.
And nowhere is that more evident than the 38th State House District in Douglas and Johnson counties.
That district has 40,677 people, which is 17,961 people more than the ideal size House district of 22,716. That means the 38th District has almost the population of two House districts.
Head to Hodgeman County in western Kansas and the 117th District has 18,133 people, which is 4,583 fewer than it should have.
In other words, the 40,677 people in the 38th have the same political might in the Kansas House — one representative — as the 18,133 people in the 117th.
“The folks in my district don’t have the same voice as people in rural Kansas do,” said Rep. Anthony Brown, R-Eudora, who represents the 38th.
Kansas legislators this year must redraw these legislative district lines to even out the population shifts that have occurred since the last redistricting 10 years ago.
But in a move last week, those urban and growing legislative districts in Kansas may continue to get the short end of the stick.
The House redistricting committee voted to allow population deviation in drawing new legislative district lines of plus or minus 5 percent. That means the final maps could establish districts already 10 percent out of whack before further deviations occur as population continues to shift over the next 10 years.
Rep. Jim Ward, D-Wichita, tried to get the committee to approve guidelines that would allow zero deviation, which is the same target state legislators have when they redraw maps of the state’s four congressional districts.
Rural legislators, and some urban ones, defeated that motion.
“It is not feasible to keep counties and towns together” with zero deviation, Rep. Caryn Tyson, R-Parker, said. Others argued that courts that review redistricting plans are more strict with congressional lines but will allow population deviation between state legislative districts.
Rep. Lance Kinzer, R-Olathe, then bargained for a 3 percent deviation. But that was also defeated.
“People are protecting their own interests,” Brown said.
Douglas County is further hindered in the redistricting process because Kansas is the only state in the nation that recalculates census figures to allow students to chose their home for redistricting purposes rather than their campus. The adjustment has the effect of reducing the population total of places like Lawrence, home of Kansas University.
Lawrence lost 12,000 people for redistricting purposes, even though these people live in Lawrence most of the year and many are registered to vote in Lawrence.
Ending this adjustment would require a constitutional amendment, and that is not likely to happen because rural legislators pick up population through the recalculation and it takes a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate to put proposed constitutional amendments on the ballot for voters to decide.



Comments
none2 1 year, 4 months ago
"“The folks in my district don’t have the same voice as people in rural Kansas do,” said Rep. Anthony Brown, R-Eudora, who represents the 38th."
Folks don't have the same voice because he is an embarrassment. What has he done for KU, Lawrence, or Douglas County except complain? He thinks he is too good to represent the area. All he is interested in is insulting parts of his constituents and wanting to push things such as covenant marriages, cuts to base funding to school districts, etc.
The big question is how in the world do 40,677 people elect such a dude? At least it is proof that eastern Kansas also has plenty of people who shouldn't be voting. If they must have voter ID checks in this state, they should also have a competence test too.
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
"The principle that all Kansans, regardless of where they live in the state, have equal representation is a fantasy."
Funny that the one piece of evidence you provide that this is an "opinion" piece happens to be entirely factual, even if you don't like the way it was worded.
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
What an idiotic post. The fact is that there is no equal representation. The fantasy (one you clearly share) is that there is equal representation.
Even one-time Democrats in Reagan country should be able to recognize this.
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
Now look up "equal" and see what your dictionary says.
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
Jeez, you really do live in a fantasy world. So the word choice in this article was completely appropriate, after all.
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
"Would you care for any other definitions?"
Sure. That you can copy and paste them and still not understand them is a marvel to behold.
vertigo 1 year, 4 months ago
"I am a libertarian"
Pffft. Hardly.
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
"That district has 40,677 people, which is 17,961 people more than the ideal size House district of 22,716. That means the 38th District has almost the population of two House districts."
But just for giggles, how should districts be divided up if the population of these districts is so irrelevant?
Would it be OK with you if every district that is now represented by a Democrat were to get split into 10 districts, since you believe relative population is irrelevant?
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 1 year, 4 months ago
So, when confronted with a very real example of unequal representation, all you can do is resort to psychobabble.
snap_pop_no_crackle 1 year, 4 months ago
Hmm, lots of stuff got disappearededed but most of the vapid squabbling remains.
vertigo 1 year, 4 months ago
If calling someone out on the obvious and blatant lies labels me as an "attack machine" then so be it.
Why do you feel the need to lie about the issues when a .69 second google search proves you're full of baloney?
Commenting has been disabled for this item.