Advertisement

Archive for Monday, September 5, 2011

Group to discuss closing schools

Meeting on consolidation scheduled for Wednesday

September 5, 2011

Advertisement

Members of the Central and East Lawrence Elementary School Consolidation Working Group are set to gather Wednesday evening for the first of 11 scheduled meetings to come up with a plan for closing some schools, upgrading others and otherwise compiling a long-term plan to guide the Lawrence school district’s K-5 education for years to come.

Rick Ingram, for one, hopes they can get the job done.

“I hope that whatever they do reflects a true consensus,” said Ingram, a member of the Lawrence school board, which is scheduled to receive the group’s recommendations in February. “If everybody feels good about the recommendations, then I’ll feel good about them.”

Working to achieve consensus will be more than two dozen volunteers with plenty at stake.

The 27-member group is instructed to propose a plan to consolidate the district’s 14 remaining elementary schools into a list of 11 or 12 within the next two or three years, as recommended earlier this year by another volunteer group — the Lawrence Elementary School Facility Vision Task Force — and endorsed unanimously by the school board.

The group includes members representing seven school communities — Cordley, Hillcrest, Kennedy, New York, Pinckney, Sunset Hill and Woodlawn — that either are being considered for consolidation or have been identified as being part of the process. Teachers from each school are serving as ex-officio members, to serve as advisers.

Two administrators from Kansas University — Marilu Goodyear, director of KU’s School of Public Affairs and Administration, and Kathleen, learning and development manager for KU’s Department of Human Resources and Equal Opportunity — will serve as co-facilitators for the group.

Wednesday’s meeting is set for 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at district headquarters, 110 McDonald Drive. The agenda calls for “brainstorming” and setting ground rules for interaction.

“We’re anxious to get going,” said Rick Doll, district superintendent.

The meeting is open to the public, although discussion is limited to members of the task force, their advisers and other district personnel.

Comments

irvan moore 2 years, 7 months ago

we have lost our sense of community, we need neighborhood schools and we don't need mega sports complexes. the direction of this city has been decided by the developers and their cronies on the city commissions and school boards. if you have school age children buy a house where there is a school with room for your kids, it's really pretty simple.

0

Richard Heckler 2 years, 7 months ago

How much will it cost taxpayers to close neighborhood schools?

Something to think about...

It seems like of all the segments of the population in the USA Lawrence,Kansas puts very little energy or money into attracting this healthy crowd as residents. About all it would take investment wise is widening more existing sidewalks to 10 feet throughout our community. Lawrence has plenty of empty houses/bedrooms.

Sarah Shipley admits she owns a car, but if she can, she will walk, ride her bike or take a bus.

Which is a fine thing, considering she’s a bicycle and pedestrian advocate who works for such groups as BikeWalkKC and the Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation.

Shipley is also a communications consultant who works out of her home in Waldo. She, her husband and two small children moved here from the Washington, D.C., area two years ago.

Q. How do you decide whether to take your car, a bus, your bike or your feet?

Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/09/04/3121105/so-you-want-to-be-car-light.html#ixzz1XApWDt6A

http://www.kansascity.com/2011/09/04/3121105/so-you-want-to-be-car-light.html

0

Flap Doodle 2 years, 7 months ago

Are you trying to get this McClure dude a job, merrill?

0

Richard Heckler 2 years, 7 months ago

Property owners in the areas of closed public schools will lose 10% of property value by this decision according to Kirk McClure. Property owners, city hall nor USD 497 cannot afford the loss.

  Who is Kirk McClure?

   Education Ph. D., City Planning, University of California, Berkeley,
  Department of City and Regional Planning, 1985.
  Concentrations in Housing Economics and Public Finance.

  Master in City Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
  Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 1978.
  Specialization in Housing Policy Analysis.

  Bachelor of Arts, University of Kansas,
  College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, 1974.
  Special Major in Urban Studies.

  Bachelor of Architecture, Graduated With Distinction
  University of Kansas,
  School of Architecture and Urban Design, 1973.
  =========================================

CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY AND THE ENVIRONMENT DECEMBER 2003

What determines the price of real estate? Location. Location. Location. This cliché is a good starting point for a discussion of property values and public choices, for it leads to the question why property values vary in different locations.

Most property owners know from experience that similar properties in different neighborhoods can command vastly different prices. But many may not realize that public choices can have large effects on property values. Public choices about capital investments, public services, and taxation affect property values because their impacts vary in different places.

A new highway interchange, for example, generally increases the value of nearby property because it increases its accessibility.

Conversely, a decision to close a school or a neighborhood police station may decrease the value of property in the neighborhood.

In public policy debates, moreover, decision makers often lack information as to how their choices will affect property values

0

Richard Heckler 2 years, 7 months ago

"We need to consolidate. The schools have a lot of repairs and upgrades that would be needed to keep them viable schools. " These schools are victims of "demolition by neglect" which means the district has become victim of reckless leadership and fiscal irresponsibility. Some of the repairs which are necessary have been on a list for 10 years or more. Why the hell is that?

This is a back door approach to direct new school construction in the areas where developers have their eyes on "new bedrooms". Schools in neighborhoods promote sales this is no secret. We're talking more local corporate welfare = wasteful tax increases.

It is not the duty of the school district to promote economic growth by way of participating in the less than desirable goals of the real estate industry and the Chamber of Commerce.

"Small schools with only one or two classrooms per grade level cost too much to operate." Says who? I've read recently that some communities are abandoning the large school approach because small schools are STILL the best learning environment. And the cost savings never surfaced.

0

notorious_agenda 2 years, 7 months ago

There is no doubt that the schools are being closed. They have already had to deal with replacing people on this working group who were only for saving the schools. They have a recommendation from a previous working group to consolidate. This new working group only deals with consolidating. There is no "hey lets keep these schools open," that's been decided already. They need to stop wasting time again and again on people who only want to save the schools.

0

Scattered 2 years, 7 months ago

Consolidation benefits nobody in the affected community. Countless studies show that the small school is most beneficial to everyone.

http://www.wpaag.org/Consolidation%20Studies.htm

0

conservative 2 years, 7 months ago

Upstate not sure where you're getting your information. Every article I've seen has talked about them using their contingency funds nothing about adding to them.

0

weeslicket 2 years, 7 months ago

  1. all of these existing schools are already paid for. the district does not "save money" when it closes a school that is already fully owned.
  2. perhaps the district is thinking of maintenance costs. well, all of the buildings have maintenance costs. just consider how much repair and maintenance money has been put into the most recently built-- langston and free state.
  3. the only "savings" a district can point to (and they won't), is that you can eliminate 1 principal, 1 secretary, and 1 librarian (1.5 custodians, 2 food service workers, and 1.4 medical staff will likely be re-assigned).
  4. and, older schools have better classrooms. period.
0

Upstate 2 years, 7 months ago

The district did not make all the cuts the board voted in 2010 (for the 2010-2011 year) and meanwhile, they managed to add millions to their savings. Again. As far back as the district posts budgets, there hasn't been a year they didn't squirrel away millions in some special fund(s) on the last day of the fiscal year.

Yes, there has been less money sent from Topeka. But we clearly have enough money to keep all the schools open - we paid all the bills and still added to savings last year. This year, we have one fewer school so the savings should be even greater.

Let's be honest about why the consolidation started. The last board simply wanted to build new buildings and they had to justify it to get public support after the last bond debacle. Conveniently, we had a state fiscal mess and someone, in deciding to not let a crisis go to waste, made budget cuts the reason for school closures.

I hope the current board is more candid about the long-range (10 year) strategic plans for our district, including planned capital expenditures.

0

conservative 2 years, 7 months ago

We need to consolidate. The schools have a lot of repairs and upgrades that would be needed to keep them viable schools. Small schools with only one or two classrooms per grade level cost too much to operate. They require the same amount of support people and almost as much in utilities as the bigger schools. Trying to say we should save All of the outdated small buildings because of community is ridiculous. The financial situation needs to be taken into account not just now in the tight times but for the future when more funds are available again. Right now to keep all of the schools open we are diverting funds from programs that help kids, not buying new texts, and taking away more and more education opportunities from the kids.

0

poolside 2 years, 7 months ago

It states in the article that these schools are targeted. So no one is thinking of salvation. Which is just plain sad. I think they need a realtor on the board so they hear WHY we keep growing west. Since the 1930's (or before) realtors have said look west not east . And look at what we have. Our downtown is threatened. Our schools in the east are threatened. What is wrong with a well built older home with a mature yard,or a school that has smaller class size and a community at your fingertips?

0

Richard Heckler 2 years, 7 months ago

What if the group feels it is not fiscally responsible to close schools only to spend more money building new schools?

There is no hard evidence substantiating closing schools is the absolute best use of existing and paid for resources.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.