Advertisement

Opinion

Opinion

Education seen as key in Afghanistan

August 31, 2010

Advertisement

There’s been a barrage of bad news lately from Afghanistan.

So I was glad for the chance to discuss “what should be done?” with Greg Mortenson, the author of the best seller “Three Cups of Tea” who has built more than 151 schools, mostly for girls, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. I’ve traveled with him to some of his schools in Pakistan; he stopped to see me in Philadelphia between interviews in New York and Washington.

Mortenson travels to the most remote rural areas of Afghanistan, including those where Taliban are active. His views are shaped over endless cups of tea with village elders. Only one of his schools has ever been attacked by Taliban, and local tribesmen quickly pushed them out.

How is he able to succeed when so many have failed?

“Success in Afghanistan,” Mortenson says, will come “when the people themselves can determine their own destiny.

“We need to put more emphasis on empowering Afghans, which means involving them in the process. You have to get buy-in from the people themselves.”

He learned that philosophy from his father, who started a hospital in Tanzania and ultimately got fired for insisting that all departments should be run by Africans. Today they are.

Mortenson puts that philosophy to work in Afghanistan, working with shuras (groups of elders). Their deepest wish is to be free from coercion, by Taliban or corrupt central government officials, and to be able to improve their lives. Prime among their concerns is educating their children. If local mullahs are resistant to approving girls’ education, they can usually be convinced over more cups of tea.

“We put our schools in areas where there are no schools at all,” Mortenson told me. As we talked in my office, he took a cell phone call from an intrepid Afghan staffer, Sarfraz Khan, who was checking in from Badakshan province, high in the Hindu Kush mountains.

“When we build our schools,” he continued, “the community has to provide free land, free labor, sweat equity, and the elders are in charge.” Mortenson’s Central Asia Institute (www.ikat.org) pays for most of the building materials, and often for teachers.

Once a school is built, the community protects it, and neighboring villages seek their own schools. The institute also helps villagers start income-generating projects to pay teachers’ salaries if the government won’t.

His staff then tells local government officials they will do more projects in the area, provided the officials also commit themselves to constructing schools.

Mortenson says he believes education can change Afghan society. “Why do we ignore what does work?” he asks passionately. “Education is Afghanistan’s greatest success story, but the education ministries are probably its least funded.” Indeed, since the Taliban were defeated, the number of Afghan schoolkids had risen from 800,000 to 8 million, including 2.8 million girls.

“If something is so successful, why aren’t we putting more money into it?” he asks. He says this country spends $1 million per year per soldier in Afghanistan. Their higher-education ministry needs $247 million to refurbish a struggling system, but the ministry will only get about $50 million. “For the cost of 247 U.S. soldiers,” he says, “we could pay for the whole thing.”

Mortenson would especially like to see the United States set up a college of mines so Afghans could train engineers to develop the country’s vast stores of precious minerals and ore, its best hope for prosperity. China is eager to develop those sites on its own terms; it is already mapping roads from its border into regions rich with mineral wealth.

Mortenson’s larger point: Americans need to think local when trying to stabilize the country. The current Afghan Constitution, drafted with U.S. help, set up a government that is too centralized and at odds with most of Afghan history. Village elders echo America’s frustration with the corruption in Kabul.

Today’s U.S. military understands the need to listen to Afghan elders. When Gen. Stanley McChrystal took command in 2009, he asked Mortenson to set up meetings between his senior staff and shuras from around the country — on a voluntary basis. These discussions will continue under the new commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus.

But empowering elders — with education, development aid, and the means to defend themselves against Taliban pressure — takes time. This is why Mortenson says: “It’s premature to begin pulling troops.” He’s certain a Taliban return would sharply reverse gains in women’s education, rights and health care.

Americans are understandably weary of the Afghan war, but Mortenson has seen how village elders stand up against Taliban coercion once they are given something concrete to fight for — including girls’ schools.

— Trudy Rubin is a columnist and editorial page editor for the Philadelphia Inquirer. trubin@phillynews.com

Comments

weeslicket 3 years, 7 months ago

really, only one comment on this topic until now?

this was a really good editorial (perhaps the low commentary numbers help to explain that fact).

lawrencjournalworldcorp-- more trudy rubin, please.

0

Richard Heckler 3 years, 7 months ago

Unfortunately I doubt if Hillary Clinton or Bob Gates have brought this matter up with Pres. Obama:

Electricity Production in Iraq Remains Below Pre-War Levels

by Dahr Jamail

Contrary to Bush Administration reports, Iraqi officials say the country's electricity problems remain endemic, and fear that despite Coalition promises, Iraq's plants will remain inadequate for the foreseeable future.

Baghdad; May 14, 2004 – Contrary to US President George Bush’s recent statement that electricity in Iraq "is now more widely available than before the war," Iraqi officials say the power supply in their country has not yet been repaired to pre-war levels. Bush made the claim in his May 1, 2004 speech commemorating the one-year anniversary of the "mission accomplished" address he delivered from aboard the USS Lincoln.

The following statement was issued from a person connected to the State Department. The State Department would not allow news interviews.

"Nothing would stabilise Iraq more than reliable electricity, which would allow business growth and employment of those who might otherwise join militias to support their families.

Electricity would attract investment and make it possible for the oil and gas sectors to expand, increase refrigeration of vaccines and fresh food, benefit schools, and even have allowed more people to watch World Cup games; it is no coincidence that major protests prompting the Electricity Minister to resign occurred in June during the football tournament."

This person went on to say that keeping bases and USA military in this region will only prolong the war.

THEWORLDTODAY.ORG AUG-SEPT 2010

The withdrawal of United States combat troops on August 31 falls during Ramadan, the Muslim month of fasting and prayer; a timetable better suited to the American political cycle than to conditions in Iraq. Ramadan usually sees a spike in violence as religious fervour combines with heat and hunger.

But delaying the withdrawal another year would mean the Iraq war surpassing the Vietnam war in length. The timing could have been better for Iraq, but withdrawal is overdue for the US. Having never been justified in the first place – legally, strategically, or defensively – it is time to end military engagement in Iraq.

THE VIEWS IN THIS ARTICLE ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THOSE OF THE US GOVERNMENT OR STATE DEPARTMENT.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.