Advertisement

Archive for Monday, October 13, 2008

District decision on fields due today

Application of city code questioned

October 13, 2008

Advertisement

Sometimes politics is all about interpretation.

For opponents of the Lawrence school district's plans to build athletic fields at Lawrence High School, city planners' interpretation of the land development code means that the project, should it receive the go-ahead from the school board tonight, results in a dangerous, and perhaps illegal, situation.

The construction project, which includes similar football and other sports facilities at Free State High School, is designated under the development code as Active Recreation, which includes athletic fields, playgrounds, zoos and docks.

Architect Steve Padget, who lives in the University Place neighborhood, argues the project should fall under the more restrictive category of Entertainment & Spectator Sports, which includes under its designation buildings with capacity of 501 or more people, such as theaters, stadiums and sports complexes.

The football stadiums proposed for the two sites would seat 4,000 spectators.

"This one is so obvious," said Padget, a tenured professor of urban planning at Kansas University, who is on sabbatical. "Active Recreation could apply from anything to a tiny park with one swing to Memorial Stadium. It is very loosely defined."

Scott McCullough, the city's planning director, said planners debated about which category the projects fell under, but ultimately decided Active Recreation was the most appropriate designation.

"When we were approached with the site plan ... staff did an extensive code search on the issues," he said. "Our opinion is an accessory football field that (includes) spectators is not (Entertainment & Spectator Sports)."

The code was revised in 2006, and McCullough said this is the first time the planning staff has had to interpret it for a construction project involving a sports complex. The staff determined that buildings, such as concert arenas, fall under the Entertainment & Spectator Sports designation.

"I think (the code) is probably written to be flexible enough to be used in certain things, but it also says it's not limited in its examples," McCullough said.

Padget's problem with the plan, which he ultimately supports, is that the Active Recreation designation does not provide for enough parking. Padget believes this will lead spectators to park on side streets during and cross 19th Street, which has few crosswalks.

"That is a patently dangerous situation," he said.

The school district plan calls for 311 additional parking spots to be added to Lawrence High, a provision that falls short of Entertainment & Spectator Sports requirement that 1,333 parking spots exist to accommodate 4,000 spectators.

"The code specifies that you have to cumulatively add up all the parking requirements," Padget said.

C.L. Maurer, a landscape architect at Landplan Engineering, which is leading the development, said a parking study was done Oct. 2, and found that the average LHS attendance of 2,500 could be accommodated by the 829 parking spots that will exist when the project is complete. In the event of a sell-out, Maurer said plans are in the works to provide additional parking at South Junior High School and KU, while local law enforcement would provide traffic control.

"It's still within code. We can find other means of using parking lots in the area, as long as we come up with a plan to handle traffic," he said.

The school board will meet tonight to hear the district's revised plans, as well as financing recommendations from its financial advising firm.

Comments

spiderman 5 years, 6 months ago

centennial & university place homeowners have definite concerns about parking & traffic.http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/sep...

0

spiderman 5 years, 6 months ago

to the school board -- now ?$14 million for athletic fields while other programs are underfunded?and duplicate football stadiums with duplicate maintenance costs?

0

spiderman 5 years, 6 months ago

at a recent Lawrence Area Neighborhoods meeting a former city commissioner asked the question:how does the school board expect voters to viewthe expenditure of more tna $2.5 million in funds from the last bond election on athletic fields while -- a list of building repairs (the purpose of the 2005 bond issue) still remain to be fixed, repaired, or remodeled?

0

spiderman 5 years, 6 months ago

how do they pay for the playing fields?

0

swan_diver 5 years, 6 months ago

Get on with the lawsuits, and stop all the BS. Established bureaucracies like the USD and the City of Lawrence don't respect people. They respect only money, and the power that the application of money creates, through the manipulation of the law and regulation.

0

spiderman 5 years, 6 months ago

excerpt from an email to a Centennial Neighborhood resident:from Mayor Dever a quote:Sorry to read about your frustrations regarding the School District improvements. I sympathize with your situation, and wish there were other options.I agree that the construction of two football stadiums appears to be redundant and perhaps overkill. I agree that we should focus our resources on a single field, but the situation will not allow it.what 'situation' does he mean? actually enforcing the City Codes?

0

macon47 5 years, 6 months ago

nothing is too good for the parentsof the school kidsthey deserve a big fancy arenato strut their stuff in and foo faa maybe we can set them in comfy seatslike ku has in the end zone.who cares, they arentpaying for iteveryone else is i

0

spiderman 5 years, 6 months ago

the main question should be:why do we need two football stadiums ?is not the cost of maintenance & construction andreplacement of the artificial turf simply twice as muchby having duplicate facilities?why not one stadium at Free State where there is twice the available land and plenty of parking ?

0

Jackson 5 years, 6 months ago

The city gave many unreasonable zoning permissions because they are in 'cahoots' with the school - BECAUSE the city parks & recs. wants to use this facility ALSO.None of the commissioners, board members or school administrators live within rifle shot of the facility, so they don't give a damn about neighborhood. They should all be recalled & all taxpayers should be alarmed at their callous behavior!

0

macon47 5 years, 6 months ago

this is greatwont have to drive to east lawrencewont get our tires muddy in the parking lotat haskelllife is goodwe need a classier place for theparents to gather plus let everyone else pay for our fun

0

71_Hawk 5 years, 6 months ago

My only comment is that this stadium proposal is not an Active Recreation facility, but an entertainment and spectator sport stadium to anyone with any amount of rational judgement. The parking will be horrendous to the neighborhoods. Come on school board, you're not fooling anyone with the idea that you had an open mind. Citizens are tired of government entities forcing things down their throat. You are probably looking at a lengthy law suit if you persist with this unreasonable and intrusive decision. I am in complete agreement that the facilities are needed to accomodate both schools, but not in the middle of a residential neighborhood.

0

Richard Heckler 5 years, 6 months ago

Average attendance = not every game by a long shotI'm all for expanding the tourism industry BUT NOT when an activity requires new multi-million dollar structures. This plan will require $10,000,000 -$12,000,000 more tax dollars at least. Then cost of staffing and maintenance plus concession supplies. Is the money being pulled from the infrastructure sales tax proposal?The bogus turf may last 8 years then the cost of replacement comes back to the budget. Which budget?Spend the USD 497 tax dollars money more wisely. Insulate Prairie Park Elementary and/or expand Deerfield Elementary. Create teaching jobs.Why is the Chamber being so persistent? Do they just love to spend OUR tax dollars? This is PLAY disguised. Millions and millions and millions of city tax dollars are necessary for this expensive project.Where is the persistence necessary for maintaining the downtown central business district aka the best money maker in town?Again I'm all for expanding the tourism industry BUT NOT when an activity requires new multi-million dollar structures. KCMO/JOCO and Topeka are going to do all they can to keep sports activities in their back yards in order protect their investments. This is not a slam dunk money maker by any stretch of anyone's imagination.The Topeka facility is tied to their public school budget.There is so much attention given to athletics but very little given to the adverse effects these activities have on knees and joints at such young ages. What about that? The city is laying people off yet there must be money hidden in general fund somewhere as this will require new staff positions. Or does USD 497 have access to extra bucks?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.