Archive for Friday, May 9, 2008
Budget includes bonds for pharmacy school
Legislature OKs $50M expansion for KU
May 9, 2008
Advertisement
Topeka For the Kansas University School of Pharmacy, the Legislature’s final budget bill was just what the doctor ordered.
“We were sitting on the edge of our seat wondering what would happen,” Kenneth Audus, dean of the pharmacy school, said Thursday.
Before shutting down the 2008 legislative session late Wednesday, lawmakers approved the so-called omnibus budget, which included $50 million in bonds for pharmacy school expansion.
The funds will go toward construction of a new building on the West Campus in Lawrence and adding on to an existing building in Wichita.
The school’s plan is to nearly double — from 105 to 190 — the number of pharmacy students admitted to KU each year to help fill a shortage of pharmacists statewide.
But while the project enjoyed support from Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and legislative leaders, the method of financing produced some confrontation.
Lawmakers approved a method during the first part of the legislative session, but Sebelius vetoed that.
Under the first legislative plan, three separate funds would have been established to dole out revenue from future casinos. And one of those funds would have gone toward retiring the debt on the bonds for the pharmacy expansion.
But Sebelius said setting up the funds and designating how much went to each one “would limit the flexibility of future Legislatures to target gaming receipts toward the most important and pressing needs of the state.”
She applied a line-item veto on the provision.
When the Legislature returned for the wrap-up session, lawmakers went back and forth on finance plans.
Eventually, they approved the bond authority over a three-year period. The bonds still will be paid off through gambling revenue, although lawmakers said if the gambling revenue fails to come through, then taxpayers will be on the hook to pay off the bonds.
Now, Audus said, KU can move forward with taking bids from architects.
Sebelius still has to sign the budget, but there seemed to be no concern on that front because she listed the bond proposal as one of the accomplishments of the legislative session.
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Marine Corps, Army exceed recruiting goals May 13, 2008 · 43 comments
- Wal-Mart nearly ready to build city’s new store May 13, 2008 · 88 comments
- Siren sound off May 12, 2008 · 46 comments
- On the street: What is an appropriate amount to spend on a graduation gift? May 13, 2008 · 28 comments
- Self may give assist to sports facility May 13, 2008 · 18 comments
- T for taxi? May 12, 2008 · 97 comments
- Ethanol defended May 11, 2008 · 48 comments
- Barnstorming Tour comes to Lawrence High Wednesday night May 13, 2008 · 1 comment
- Chamber role May 13, 2008 · 11 comments
- Weblog: In My Yard-So Pink It Hurts May 12, 2008 · 5 comments
- Wal-Mart nearly ready to build city’s new store May 13, 2008
- Administrator stepping down May 13, 2008
- Barnstorming Tour comes to Lawrence High Wednesday night May 13, 2008
- Siren sound off May 12, 2008
- NCAA opens Mayo investigation May 13, 2008
- Wendy’s receives Bert Nash award May 13, 2008
- Regional revenge May 13, 2008
- Going out on top May 13, 2008
- Clinton should do the ‘right’ thing May 13, 2008
- Jayhawks-to-be get a little good press May 12, 2008


9 May 2008 at 7:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
The supposed tax windfall from the gaming industry may never come to fruition. It is a good thing not to plan to fund a $50,000,000 project on a cash cow that hasn't even been born yet.
Why are we putting the state deeper into debt to build new buildings when the issue of funding neglected maintenance of existing structures has not been addressed? The legislature and governor should have told KU that, if it can raise the money for the buildings through the endowment association, including a fund for future maintenance, the legislature would allow them to build the buildings, period.
9 May 2008 at 10:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
booze_buds_03 (Anonymous) says…
They are state buildings, thus state resposibility to maintain them.
9 May 2008 at 7:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
davidsmom (Anonymous) says…
It doesn't make sense to build new buildings or new wings on old ones when you can't afford to maintain what you already have.