Archive for Friday, August 8, 2008

City may drop homeless housing plan

New service would cut into existing programs

August 8, 2008

Advertisement

Plans for a new program that would encourage Lawrence landlords to offer vacant apartments to the homeless may have to be put on hold because of city funding problems.

City commissioners as part of their draft 2009 budget had included about $58,000 for the Lawrence-Douglas County Housing Authority to hire a coordinator for the Housing Connection program.

But at their Tuesday evening meeting, commissioners likely will consider backing away from that commitment. That's because concerns are rising over cuts included in the budget to other homeless programs.

To come up with the $58,000 in new funding, commissioners cut elsewhere in their budget, including about $44,000 from the Homeless Outreach Program run by the Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center.

Bert Nash and a group of downtown ministers have recently urged city commissioners to reconsider that cut. David Johnson, CEO for Bert Nash, said the funding cut would require that at least one of the four homeless outreach workers be cut. Each outreach worker provides counseling and assistance to 30 to 40 individuals.

"There's no question the program has made a difference," Johnson said. "Having staff out on the street on a regular basis has allowed us to build up relationships with people who often don't trust the system."

City Manager David Corliss said the concern over cutbacks to the outreach program will lead him to ask commissioners to reconsider the new housing program. He said he will recommend that city commissioners ask the Community Commission on Homelessness to recommend how the city should spend the approximately $180,000 set aside for the two programs.

"The consensus from discussions that I've had is that with the limited resources, it may be better to fully fund the outreach program rather than trying to start a new program right now," Corliss said.

Being forced to pick between the two programs may be difficult for homeless service advocates. The Bert Nash program was started at the suggestion of the Community Commission on Homelessness, but the homeless commission also has been a strong proponent of creating the landlord program.

The landlord program has been touted as a good way to provide temporary housing to the homeless at a relatively low cost. Vacancy rates in Lawrence apartments have been higher than average in recent years, which had homeless service advocates hopeful that some landlords may be willing to participate.

Corliss said he thinks both programs have merits.

"But I believe it is going to be tough to fully fund both of them," Corliss said.

City commissioners are scheduled to finalize the last details of the 2009 budget at their 6:35 p.m. meeting Tuesday at City Hall, Sixth and Massachusetts streets.

Comments

Godot 6 years, 8 months ago

$58,000 for the homeless program would pay a lot of rent to get homeless families off the street. That is, if it weren't being used to pay salary for a "homeless coordinator." Bureaucracy is soooooooo expensive.

Richard Heckler 6 years, 8 months ago

It seems that Lawrence is not only over stocked in retail,residential but also over stocked in rental properties.So why do the powers that be continue to approve new project additions to all? It obviously is not restoring valueto property owners? Since when has over building ever made property more valuable or produced additional tax revenue? Sounds like voodoo economics!

lootah0506 6 years, 8 months ago

I use to volunteer a lot, and I would sort of not look forward to working with the homeless, a lot of them are meeean :(

WHY 6 years, 8 months ago

Do not give the homeless a penny and they will leave. Problem solved.

unite2revolt 6 years, 8 months ago

I think the best thing for the city to do is abandon the LDCHA proposal. Its interesting that everyone seemed to see this coming except the Homeless Commission, LDCHA, and Bert Nash. The city was very clear about no new money for the housing plan, and yet the only proposal sent forward requested 58K in funding. Where did they think the money was going to come from?

BigPrune 6 years, 8 months ago

So in other words there will be no cuts to programs for the homeless because the City has decided not to start a new homeless program.

igby 6 years, 8 months ago

Addicts are mean people!Big monkey!Big ego!No money.No job.No class.Even if they had a free apartment they would still be down on Mass. st. panhandling and boozing and hooking up. Their having fun being homeless and as long as they can call themselves homeless they will not take any responsibility for themselves or the things they do or the way they live. Gilmore, the guy that always laying around in front of someones shop on Mass. street; he just wants attention and he has cost the city of Lawrence $75,000 per year for the last 5 years. Yes, tax payer dollars right out the window just so he can lay around and get attention being Gilmore.He claims he's blind but he's not. He does have some vision problems but he's mainly a bogus act. I knew him back in 1989, when he was at KU. His dad was a doctor in KC. Paid all his bills and he had a trust fund for cash. Did daddy cut him off? Now he cost the city and county $75,000 per year.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.