November 10, 2007
Advertisement
Standoff ends in fire
Buildings burn at a residence south of Lawrence, east of Pleasant Grove Hill, where an unidentified man kept authorities at bay Friday. The man was safely taken into custody, but the buildings were gutted. Enlarge video
Pleasant Grove standoff in tenth hour
A stand-off south of Lawrence entered its tenth hour as a man continued to hold officers from several different agencies at bay. Enlarge video
Roads closed as standoff reaches hour six
Douglas County Sherriff's deputies have surrounded a house southeast of Pleasant Grove shortly after one o'clock this afternoon. Enlarge video
A 10-hour standoff in rural Douglas County ended Friday night when sheriff’s deputies took a man into custody — but with fires gutting the house and barn where he had kept authorities at bay.
“It’s successful at this point,” Douglas County Sheriff’s Lt. Kari Wempe said about 11 p.m. “No one was hurt. The man was taken into custody; however, the Willow Springs fire department is fighting a fire there at a residence.”
The man was not immediately identified, and the fires were under control by the early hours of the morning. But his arrest ended a tense day for authorities and nearby residents.
It began about 1 p.m., Wempe said, when authorities received a call from someone concerned about the man’s welfare.
When deputies arrived at the residence — south of Lawrence, east of Pleasant Grove — the man barricaded himself and kept them at bay, reportedly with a shotgun and threats of setting the house on fire.
The property was soon surrounded by deputies and members of the Kansas Highway Patrol and Lawrence Police Department. The Willow Springs Township Fire Department and Lawrence-Douglas County Fire & Medical were also called to the scene.
They were joined by the man’s son, who communicated with the man and authorities. Wempe said he was a “willing relative,” and there were no hostages.
According to the Douglas County property records Web site, the homeowner at the residence, 688 East 1375 Road, is Darrel Maley.
Frank McGuinness, who lives across the street, said he started noticing a commotion about 1:30 p.m. when a half-dozen law enforcement vehicles pulled up around his house.
McGuinness said officers had their binoculars trained on a large outbuilding on his neighbor’s property — where at least one man appeared to come and go. McGuinness was told that he and his 3-year-old son should stay inside.
Before Friday, there was no sign of a problem with the neighbors, McGuinness said.
“I’ve probably met them five to 10 times — they’ve always been really kind, pretty level-headed,” he said. “I sure as heck would’ve never thought it would’ve happened to these people.”
As darkness fell, McGuinness said, there was little evidence the situation was moving to a resolution.
“They have lights on the building,” he said, “and the status appears the same.”
Through the afternoon and evening, sheriff’s deputies communicated with the man, who Wempe said was “not cooperating.”
“These kinds of things take their own pace so we’re going to take whatever time it requires in order to have a successful conclusion and get the answers that individual is seeking or that the officers need,” Wempe said near the scene about 4 p.m.
Details about the origin of the fire were unconfirmed at press time.
6News anchor and reporter Janet Reid contributed to this report.
Top ads RSS
- Now Hiring! Paid training, flexible hours. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, ...
- Janitorial/ Light Maintenance Worker needed for 101 apartment complex. 30 ...
- Call-in/substitute teachers needed for area child care centers. Training provided, ...
- DISTRIBUTION SPECIALIST Lawrence Journal-World is hiring for full-time and part-time ...
- Legal Assistant Barber Emerson law firm is in need of ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Gas prices topped $3 per gallon in Lawrence in March, but seven months later they have finally dropp 2 comments
- Creation tale October 6, 2008 · 65 comments
- Public opinion largely against lower speed limits October 6, 2008 · 27 comments
- Obama headquarters reopens in Lawrence September 6, 2008 · 69 comments
- Weblog: Break out the Obama brown shirt October 4, 2008 · 87 comments
- T blackmail October 5, 2008 · 58 comments
- Former Lawrence church youth leader convicted of aggravated indecent liberties with a child October 6, 2008 · 35 comments
- Credit unions appear to avoid turmoil October 6, 2008 · 2 comments
- On the street: Are you in favor of reducing the speed limit to lower greenhouse gas emissions? October 6, 2008 · 40 comments
- GOP to file complaint against Obama October 6, 2008 · 52 comments
- Former Lawrence church youth leader convicted of aggravated indecent liberties with a child October 6, 2008
- Firefighters extinguish two-alarm blaze at new Free State Brewery facility in east Lawrence October 5, 2008
- Free State Brewing Co. fire ruled accidental October 6, 2008
- ‘Silver tsunami’ to hit city October 6, 2008
- KU-Oklahoma game to be televised on ABC October 6, 2008
- Staph-linked flu deaths in kids jump October 6, 2008
- Two Baldwin City teens hurt in traffic accident October 6, 2008
- Prep hoops forward torn between Memphis, KU October 6, 2008
- Farm tours enchant all age groups October 5, 2008
- Pitch perfect: KU senior finds balance between music major, job October 6, 2008


10 November 2007 at 7:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
overplayedhistory (Anonymous) says…
Something is missing from this story. It doesn't appear that the man was a threat to anyone but himself. Why the stand off? Either the ljw has done a poor job with all the facts or the Sheriff Dept. is not telling the whole story. Maybe he just wanted to be left alone and freaked out when the sheriff knocked on his door. What answers did the officers need? I hope more Info comes forth. Right now, it doesn't sound like this was a job for the Sheriff's Dept. Sounds like the Sheriff's Dept. created a job for the fire Dept.
10 November 2007 at 7:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
another_concerned_parent (Anonymous) says…
The full story is never released in the paper. It is none of our business what the full story is. So stop blaming he LEOs involved.
10 November 2007 at 8:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
nobody1793 (Anonymous) says…
Just because it's nobody's business has never stopped the LJW before!
10 November 2007 at 8:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Ragingbear (Anonymous) says…
Ever notice that standoffs tend to result in fires, and that the fire is never started with something like a tear gas cannister, but a candle that didn't exist?
10 November 2007 at 9 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
NotASquishHead (Anonymous) says…
Overplayedhistory - Do you really think the deputies would just walk away from a man who was “a threat to himself” (a/k/a suicidal)? Can you imagine the uproar if they would have left and then the gentleman took his own life?
It sounds to me like everyone involved did a tremendous job, as the gentleman and all of the officers apparently went uninjured. It's a shame the buildings burnt, but they are replaceable, the gentleman isn't. A friend of mine heard the initial call on his scanner and the call mentioned that the gentleman had doused the buildings with diesel and gasoline… If this is true then it wouldn't have taken much for him to set the buildings off.
No matter what it sounds like it was a quality job and everyone goes home safe.
10 November 2007 at 9:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
softtalker (Anonymous) says…
Everyone needs to just stay out of it. I have known this family for almost 5 years now and they deserve to be just left alone, people need to stop making assumptions. He was sent to the hospital and now he is in custody. No hostages, and no one was hurt so thats all anyone should be worried about.
10 November 2007 at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
truthvfiction1212 (Anonymous) says…
I can answer ragingbears question…It was a UFO that started the fire and the gov't is covering it up.
10 November 2007 at 10:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
good job all the agencies involved. this guy and his son et al will live another day. nice work.
***
don't mind ragingbear, his foilhat was manufactured by Halliburton.
10 November 2007 at 10:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion Lynn (Marion Lynn) says…
Thorazine.
Haldol, maybe?
10 November 2007 at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
doc1 (Anonymous) says…
WHen the call came out the deputy dispatchers said that the guy poured gasoline all over his house and theatened his wife there would be a shootout if she called the cops. Thats from someone who has a scanner I didn't hear that personally.
10 November 2007 at 12:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hawkperchedatriverfront (Anonymous) says…
high taxes
10 November 2007 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
overplayedhistory (Anonymous) says…
So the wife called the cops? The only question I am asking is if no one would have called the cops what would have happened?
We all know if someone has really decided to commit suicide they will succeed. Only a burnt down property success story move on sure Ok.
I think by in large both the sheriff,HP and the Lpd are good and reasonable. The sheriff was real polite before he ask to search my car.
Even the most reasonable honest peace officers, are not going to respond well to the crazy old man whose drunk and in a dark place when called in. I can hear it now “someone called in worried about you sir, is everything all right” response “F you P*g get off my porch I want to be left alone” (standoff). I know people that in certain situations would respond that way and that is exactly the reason I didn't call the cops.
10 November 2007 at 12:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
I agree it is not for anyone here to ask questions or judge. This article was little more than an attempt to show someone in the city/county government is doing something positive. However, I notice it does not keep most from ripping the mayor to pieces though.
10 November 2007 at 1:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Paul R. Getto (Paul R. Getto) says…
overplayedhistory (Anonymous) says…
We all know if someone has really decided to commit suicide they will succeed…
_________________________________________________________________________
Ok - so we know this to be true - what does it have to do with the story? Was he trying to commit suicide by fire?
10 November 2007 at 1:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Pywacket (Anonymous) says…
overplayedhistory, you're an idiot. On so many counts. You will never know how many people are walking around, healthy and happy, today because someone intervened when “they were in a dark place” and thwarted their suicide plans/attempts. You will never know how many because (duhhhh) they probably don't publicize what they almost did years ago when they were (pick one or more) young, drunk, depressed over a job loss or a bad relationship, depressed for reasons they couldn't even pinpoint, etc… Every time I have learned of this about someone (usually after getting to know them quite well), I've been a little blown away. They are often people you would NEVER expect had ever been that desperate.
Not all who contemplate suicide have a driving, persistent urge to do so. With many, it's an impulsive, often alcohol-fueled gesture and they will never repeat it once they get beyond that low point in their lives.
Obviously, you have not a clue on this subject, so my best advice to you would be to shut the EFF up and just accept that you're wrong. If someone is a threat—only to himself—society (in the form of emergency personnel, most often) is obliged to intervene if humanly possible. They absolutely did the right thing.
Among the many other points that could be made to counter your idiotic suggestion that they should've just left him alone– you don't just walk away from a potential inferno. As dry as it's been, fire is unpredictable. It can spread to other properties, other structures. To ignore the possibility that the guy might go ahead and torch the place (or that it might ignite from unintentional causes,since he had reportedly already doused it in fuel!!) would be absurd, irresponsible, stupid, (let's see—are you getting the general idea here?)…
And for those who tiresomely rag on the LJW whenever they report the news—just what do you think a news organization is supposed to do? This is news. Deal.
10 November 2007 at 5:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
overplayedhistory (Anonymous) says…
Lets hear a transcript of exactly what was said at the front door. I only asked a question what if. I never suggested that they leave him alone, they had to respond. Forgive me for being suspicious of how cops handle such situations, especially young ones. I am sure you have never been hassled by cops. How many times did this story not unfold. If someone tells me, if I call the cops there will be a shoot out. I might not call the authorities right away. I have a friend who called me when he was driving around with his kid, telling me he was going to commit suicide. I should of done the right thing and called the cops and gave them his info. I did not do that and guess what, ten years later he and his kid are still here. Before someone else jumps me telling me how well everything was handled, let me say again I am only curious for more details. How does this happen? Maybe the guy really wanted to get on the news, I don't know. I only gave a gut reaction to the story. Questions j*rk @ff, I am asking questions. Did the cop smell fuel? etc. I didn't read the fire was accelerated by fuel did you. Do most stand offs start with a call of concern for an individual? I started off by saying something was missing. Obviously it satisfied you, I had questions. Maybe I should give you my name an address, so you can call the cops and have them shut me the eff up.
10 November 2007 at 7:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
b3 (Anonymous) says…
Another crazy off the street, good work LPD.
10 November 2007 at 7:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
igby (Anonymous) says…
These types of situations are hard to call. Anyone can call in and report on someone who they feel is a threat to their own person. Does this make law enforcement responsible, no. Credibility from the source of the complaint is a factor. Law enforcement can come and ask is everything OK and check their response. The response is what determines wheather or not the person is a threat to their person. However, if the persons is using drugs and making drugs they may not appreciate nosy law enforcement coming around and well it can go bad in a hurry. Probable cause may not be established. Remember, Law enforcement people enforce the law, but also protect and serve. People with mental illness sometimes can't protect themselves.