Tom Thornton, president and chief executive officer on the NBAF
Tom Thornton, president and chief executive officer, talks about Kansas' efforts to land the proposed Naitonal Bio and Agro-Defense Facility.
Bio-defense in Kansas
- Leaders back Manhattan as home for defense lab (09-29-07)
- Research awaits final preparations at KSU lab (09-04-07)
- Biolab could stay in N.Y. (08-30-07)
- Biodefense lab draws high level of support (08-29-07)
- Manhattan's finalist status for biodefense lab site spells potential for KU (08-11-07)
- Comments to play role in location of biodefense lab (08-07-07)
Topeka — Officials who are battling other states to try to lure a national laboratory to Kansas said Friday they are concerned that Washington politics could become a factor in the fight.
"We need to make sure this does not get political," said Tom Thornton, president and chief executive officer of the Kansas Bioscience Authority.
But state lawmakers said that probably wasn't realistic.
"How the hell are you going to keep it from becoming political?" asked state Sen. Jim Barone, D-Frontenac.
Thornton and R.W. Trewyn, vice president for research at Kansas State University, gave the House-Senate Committee on Kansas Security an update on Kansas' efforts to land the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility.
Called NBAF for short, the proposed $450 million lab will be used by the Department of Homeland Security to develop countermeasures to animal and human diseases.
The Kansas State campus is one of six sites under consideration.
The other finalists are in Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Texas and a current government lab at Plum Island, N.Y. Homeland Security is scheduled to select the site in October 2008.
Thornton and Trewyn said based on Homeland Security criteria for the project, they felt Kansas would win on its merits.
Kansas State is one of the leading animal research universities in the nation, and has a new bioscience lab that the federal government could use while it builds NBAF. In addition, the region is home to a thriving animal health industry, and the project has widespread public support.
"On the merits, I do believe we have the best bid," Thornton said.
But he and Trewyn said some other states in the running have more political clout in Congress, which holds the purse strings to the project.
State Rep. Lee Tafanelli, R-Ozawkie, said the Kansas team should exploit the weaknesses of bids from other finalists.
"We don't want to take our foot off the pedal," he said.
Like several other finalists, Kansas has hired a lobbyist to represent its interests in the contest, Thornton said.
And, he said, Kansas is trying to expand its political influence by reaching out to other states and telling them they could collaborate with Kansas State on research.
Thornton also said he believes there will be less political maneuvering on this issue because it is crucial to national defense. "People will be kept in line," he said.
Comments
LJWorld.com doesn’t necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.
merrill (anonymous) says…
The tax dollar boondoggle aka Dept of Homeland Security should be shut down and may well be sooooooo turn your efforts toward the Green Collar Industry. Time and money are being wasted.
Orwell (anonymous) says…
For once (and probably only once) Sen. Barone is right.
A half-billion buck federal project affected by political considerations? What's next sunrise in the east?
bearded_gnome (anonymous) says…
once again, merrill spews his empty noise. he is a despicable subhuman who praises those who blow up our troops in iraq, and he wants all funds taken from homeland security, proof that the is totally without any substance and should be simply ignored. he would have us surrender to al-qaeda...there's a strategy!
he also believes that broken streets serve as passive traffic calming devices; he is on the traffic safety commission, when actually he wants people to give up use of the automobile.
***
I hope Kstate lands this, and that the "political pressure" for other states fails. unfortunately politics has played too great a role in dhs grants and a process should be formed that would insulate decissionmakers from it. this is our security we're talking about. I also know that some animal raisers have been concerned about proximity to this facility.
not_dolph (anonymous) says…
Merrill - you are so sadly lost it is pathetic.
458casul (anonymous) says…
let him stay lost
Left_handed (anonymous) says…
May turn political? These types of pork-barrel projects are, by definition, political.