Archive for Saturday, May 5, 2007

Roberts urges emphasis on science, math

May 5, 2007

Advertisement

The United States is endangering its national security by not producing more students with skills in math and science, Sen. Pat Roberts said Friday.

Speaking to the Kansas University School of Engineering's advisory committee, Roberts, a Kansas Republican, encouraged several students in attendance to explain how they managed to stick with engineering courses, even when they can be particularly challenging.

"You have to tell me how you made it to your sophomore year, instead of falling victim to burnout and other distractions," he said.

The U.S. Senate recently passed legislation that Roberts hopes will help address the deficiency in the number of students pursuing these careers. Known as the America COMPETES Act, the bill provides an extra $16 billion, spread over four years, to recruit and train tens of thousands of math and science researchers. It also should provide more teachers in those fields.

The bill, which had 70 co-sponsors, passed 88-8. However, its prospects in the House of Representatives are far less certain.

Roberts appeared at KU as part of a broader set of meetings of the engineering school's advisory committee, which includes current and former corporate leaders, as well as members of government and the military.

In introducing the senator, Stuart Bell, dean of the school, said Roberts is a leader in the effort to encourage math and science work.

"When I had a chance to visit Capitol Hill, we discussed how the STEM fields at KU and across the country can work together to entice and encourage K-12 systems to encourage students to pursue a career in those fields," Bell said. "Senator Pat Roberts is the leader on these issues."

So-called STEM fields include science, technology, engineering and mathematics and are considered by some to be the base of an advanced society.

In his speech, Roberts also touched on the importance of safeguarding the national food system against biological terror attacks, an issue that has become even more important in Kansas as the federal government ponders where to construct the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility.

Roberts has been a major advocate of the two Kansas locations for the facility, which is expected to cost $451 million to build and generate as many as 1,500 jobs.

"I think it's going to be an essential component in protecting the national economy against a bioterror attack on our food supply," he said. "It's so easy to do."

He cited the ease with which mad cow disease moved from Canada to the United States as an example of how simple it would be to disrupt the food system, as well as the economy.

"The United States has been blessed with the most inexpensive food supply with the best quality in the history of the world," he said. "We can't jeopardize that."

Comments

LJWorld.com doesn’t necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

  1. jayhawks71 (anonymous) says…

    Science, but in Kansas, what form of science will be taught? The form that requires that any of those "other theories" to be covered, in which anyone's half-baked idea becomes a "theory" regardless of how dogmatic and enerring they believe their "theory" is? I sure hope the Flying Spaghetti Monster gets some time in Biology class; perhaps if enough myths are covered, the hard stuff, the actual science can get eliminated. Students will rejoice when the answer to "how" anything occurs becomes, "God (and not just any god) did it!" Imagine how easy it will be to grade exams; teachers rejoice!

  2. yourworstnightmare (anonymous) says…

    Yeah, math and science are great until they conflict with religious dogma. Does Roberts mean the "new science" wherein every crackpot notion supported by religious dogma is a valid scientific hypothesis?

    The "new science" of 1+1=50, where Jesus turned a loaf of bread and a fish into a feast? Engineers and mathematicians will be interested in this.

    The "new science" of creationism, whereby god created the world and everything in it exactly as it appears today? Even light in transit from stars millions of light years away? Evolutionary scientists will be interested in this.

    The "new science" of developmental preformation, where a fertilized egg is the equivalent of an adult human life? Developmental biologists will be interested in this.

    Oh yes, Kansas is on the forefront of "new science". Trouble is, the rest of the country and world haven't been convinced.

  3. just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (anonymous) says…

    Roberts sure wasn't to concerned about how things "added up" when BushCo was busy lying in front of the senate intelligence committee when he was the chair.

  4. Machiavelli_mania (anonymous) says…

    Hey what happened to my post.

    If one aligns with Bush, as Roberts has, that one will go down, and hard.
    Pat Roberts didn't like the fact that people no longer respect him due to his massive mistakes and total neglect of Congressional Oversight on Intelligence??
    Too bad, because that is how Kansas and the nation see his clear Senatorial incompetence (or was it a deliberate oversight? !YES!)

    Pat Roberts let this country down and hundreds of thousands DIED, are still dying, because of it.
    How can Kansas forgive such an inaction, deliberately or otherwise?
    They cannot. They will not.

  5. Machiavelli_mania (anonymous) says…

    I also remind everyone that Pat Roberts was a leading part of the nation's dissatisfaction (caps for emphasis only) with Bush's GOP Congress, whose approval level was one of the worst in USA history.

  6. merrill (anonymous) says…

    The United States is endangering its national security by occupying foreign countries and building up a tax paid 200,000 strong mercenary army. Bad diplomacy is bad for national security and so are legislators from both sides of the aisle who stand beside lying Presidents and staff.

  7. pelliott (anonymous) says…

    Boy he should start with his own party, Brownback for one, Teaching intelligent design as science should be a sin.