Kansas Legislature
Statewide smoking ban passes out of committee
But opt-out provision lets counties decide otherwise
January 31, 2007
Advertisement
Topeka — A watered-down ban on smoking in indoor public places hobbled out of a Senate committee today.
The measure was sent by the Judiciary Committee to the full Senate with no recommendation as to whether it should pass or fail.
The bill would impose a statewide smoking ban but allow county commissioners to opt out of the prohibition. If they do, voters would then have the ability to overturn that decision.
Cities, such as Lawrence, which already have indoor smoking bans, would not be affected if the county decided to opt out of the proposal.
Originally, Senate Bill 37 simply banned smoking in workplaces, bars, restaurants and other indoor areas.
But Sen. Derek Schmidt, R-Independence, said his provision to allow counties to opt out and then voters to decide the issue would give the public more time to consider the issue.
Public health groups, however, supported a more comprehensive prohibition.
But Sen. Phil Journey, R-Haysville, said Schmidt's approach was more politically palpable.
"Too many people in this building don't understand that a half loaf is better than none," Journey said.
More like this
- Smoking legislation moves to full Senate February 1, 2007
- Committee postpones action on statewide smoking ban bill 1 comment / January 31, 2007
- Statewide smoking ban hits snag in committee 8 comments / January 30, 2007
- Exemptions added to smoking ban bill 2 comments / February 23, 2008
- Discussion due 3 comments / March 31, 2008
Top ads RSS
- Now Hiring Experienced Sales People $9/hour + commission + bonus ...
- Research Assistant KU Requires bachelor's degree in biochemistry, chemistry, molecular ...
- ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Fundraising and public relations firm seeking full-time administrative ...
- KU Informational Systems
- Floor Tech/Floater Sun.-Thurs., 2-4 hrs. per night, start at 5:00 ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Dropping home values may not accurately reflect market November 25, 2009 · 35 comments
- Quiet revolution taking place in America November 25, 2009 · 110 comments
- Lambert performance causes stir November 25, 2009 · 41 comments
- Local residents work together to make donation to Locks of Love November 25, 2009 · 4 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 42 comments
- 100 years ago: KU fans looking forward to Missouri game November 25, 2009 · 1 comment
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 71 comments
- On the street: Is Thanksgiving your favorite holiday? November 25, 2009 · 42 comments
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009 · 37 comments
- Blog: Tasering Your Preteen: Can You Imagine? November 24, 2009 · 68 comments
- Former KU Chancellor Laurence Chalmers dies November 25, 2009
- Research: Giving thanks brings health, happiness November 25, 2009
- Cornish hens: a special little meal November 25, 2009
- KU says student didn't follow proper lab procedures before exposure to toxic chemical November 25, 2009
- Haskell freshman dies in Montana jail November 24, 2009
- Message warns students at Perry-Lecompton not to attend class today April 20, 2007
- Former OU basketball coach Billy Tubbs to speak at Lawrence Chamber of Commerce meeting November 24, 2009
- City gives signal for traffic lights November 25, 2009
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009
31 January 2007
at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hipper_than_hip (Anonymous) says…
Opt-out sounds more like a cop-out.
31 January 2007
at 12:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KS (Anonymous) says…
Opt-out is a cop-out, but more than that, the voters of Lawrence would not be able to decide. Done deal here.
31 January 2007
at 12:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
budwhysir (Anonymous) says…
A watered down plan??? OPT out????
Politicaly speaking, I am not sure how this helps with our affordable housing solution or how it even addresses the new rec center they are thinking about.
31 January 2007
at 1:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
budwhysir (Anonymous) says…
If they realy wanted to ban smoking, wouldnt they just make it illegal for stores to sell smoking products???
So they want it to be legal to buy smokes, for tax collection purposes, but they want it to be illegal for you to smoke, for revenue collections
31 January 2007
at 1:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
moderationman (Anonymous) says…
No, they simply want you to smoke in your own home so that you don't pollute the air of those around you. Your decision to commit a slow suicide should not affect me.
31 January 2007
at 1:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
moderationman (Anonymous) says…
No, they simply want you to smoke in your own home so that you don't pollute the air of those around you. Your decision to commit a slow suicide should not affect me.
31 January 2007
at 1:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
budwhysir (Anonymous) says…
Actualy Im not a smoker, I just see alot of politics in this matter
31 January 2007
at 3:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
SettingTheRecordStraight (Anonymous) says…
I hate, hate, hate cigarette smoke.
What I hate even more is government telling private enterprise what they can and can't do in the name of protecting me.
31 January 2007
at 5:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
drederick_tatum (Anonymous) says…
Why don't all these anti-tobacco groups like “The Truth” ever tell the WHOLE truth….. like how many people per year die from cannabis? Or better yet, all the people EVER that have been killed simply by smoking too much weed?
For every new smoking ban they invent they should remove a toking ban as well, because the statistics are just as obvious.
31 January 2007
at 8:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
budwhysir (Anonymous) says…
I say we need to raise the taxes to do a feasability study on this matter prior to moving forward
31 January 2007
at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
davisnin (Anonymous) says…
Or maybe how many people in their statistics were just old or fat. If you smoke and get heart disease or emphysema, it was caused by smoking. Even if everyone in your family drops dead of a heart attack at 36 and you get one at 59 and you smoke and they didn't… it was the smoking. Hit by a car and smoke? It was the smoking.
Give up your freedom (and more so that of others) for “safety” people…
hmm, there's some saying about that