Learning gap

To the editor:

Unbelievable! The story appearing in the Oct. 17 Journal-World explains why so many students seem unfamiliar with the scientific method, a foundation of education purportedly taught in our schools. Paying private school tuition would be pretty upsetting right now with Ron Kresten teaching his version of science, whatever that could possibly be, to my kids. The sciences are all based on rigorous testing of a hypothetical answer to a proposed question using observation and experimentation. I am appalled at the arrogance of those calling themselves educators who insist on redefining established practices in a lock-step march right back to the Dark Ages.

Kresten’s statements put the finishing touch on months of stories, letters and editorials that have spotlighted the paucity of vision in this country. Those seeing no harm in teaching intelligent design (creationism) alongside evolution seem to be under the impression that I.D. is established science, which it is NOT by any stretch of imagination or verbiage. This pervasive misunderstanding, especially among young adults, of the difference between science and philosophy indicates serious failure in the educational system, including a seemingly inadequate teacher certification process.

While failing to teach the groundwork necessary to understand and appreciate scientific discovery, impressionable children are being immersed in religious intolerance. The inherent evil in such contemptuous disregard of other beliefs and cultures is evident throughout history. No wonder the Arab world mistrusts us.

Lisa Bailey,

Lawrence