To the editor:

We are all aware of the not infrequent accusations that the media in this country may be biased toward progressive interests. We also are aware of the loud denunciations against this accusation. I need some help in understanding the perception of the editorial staff of the Journal-World with respect to this issue.

On the subject of the need for tax increases for the local schools there have been articles as to why an increase is needed. There have been articles on teacher and student needs. There have been articles on program cuts. There have been articles/editorials on the failure of the Legislature to provide adequate funding. There have been many other articles that available space precludes mentioning.

On the other side of that argument, well, apparently there is no other side. I cannot recall a single substantive and reasoned article critical of a full and immediate quarter-billion dollar annual funding increase for education. Surely somebody opposes the increase or it would already be a fact.

Bias can be reflected in unbalanced articles or in a pattern of articles that over time provide focused endorsement. Could the Journal-Word, an institution proud of the balance in its individual articles, be guilty of the latter form of bias?

George Lippencott,

Lawrence