To the editor:

In recent months, both young and old readers of the Journal-World have been exposed to relentless diatribes and epithets from politicos, academics and bureaucrats on several topics. Unfortunately, their remarks have rarely risen to the level of intelligent discussion that one would have liked to have seen.

Perhaps one of the lessons your readership might wish to take from these rants is that earnest problem solving, conflict resolution or even mutual understanding are predicated on the premise that all parties will remain civil, polite, well-mannered and most of all, rational. When discussions become arguments and arguments become attacks there can be no resolution, there can be no compromise, there can be no listening. Perhaps, one of the best unintended outcomes for your readership to derive from these unfortunate interactions is to realize how hurtful and unhelpful they really are.

Furthermore, I think that there may be a teachable moment here for all of us. This is not the way to solve problems and definitely not the way to discuss differences. Parents, your children are watching and many of them may be reading the events of the past months. This is a great opportunity for you to teach them a better way, to educate them about civil discourse and listening skills. Adults, this is a chance for you to reflect on your own communication skills as well. Thank you for listening.

Robert G. Harrington,

Lawrence