Road precedent

To the editor:

The 10th Federal Appeals Court, the same court that killed KDOT’s original wetland paving plans for 31st Street, ruled just last week that Salt Lake City’s Legacy Highway project should never have gotten a Corps of Engineers 404 permit. When the court said Utah’s DOT did not seriously consider alternatives to building through wetlands it sounded all too familiar.

In the case of the SLT, however, the Corps has already established that there is an alternative available. According to the DEIS, south of the river offers equal benefits and no greater detriments than going through the wetland. Well respected aquatic biologists like Joe Collins and Kelly Kindscher have explained why paving this established wetland is a fool’s choice. A bigger wetlands is not necessarily better when biodiversity is severely diminished. This truckway will bring noise, light and air pollution.

Environmental justice was not an element in Utah’s court fight. That factor makes the SLT much more nationally significant. Federal “environmental justice” laws and presidential directives play large here because Indians are clearly bearing the brunt of negative consequences from this highway. Eight lanes of asphalt is totally unacceptable to people who consider this place sacred. Environmental justice advocates are becoming aware that if a road can be build through these wetlands nowhere will be safe from the pavers. Write the corps before Sept. 30. Tell them not to grant this 404 permit to KDOT.

Michael Caron,

Lawrence