To the editor:

While discussing Wal-Mart’s possible expansion in Lawrence, confusion as to the negative prospects of having another “big-box” has arisen. In a previous letter to the editor, Jeff White-Dressel expressed that he could not differentiate between Wal-Mart and any other capitalist enterprise in America.

One difference is astoundingly shocking: Wal-Mart’s own blatant disregard for the community and its residents, the corporation’s employees and decent business practice. Documentation across the United States has fueled a fierce anti-big-box campaign citing these horrifying actions. Due to its size, the corporation can afford to advertise more, price lower, and out-compete any existing store. Wal-Mart engages in “predatory pricing” that will undercut its competitors until there is no more competition. A 10-year study in Iowa showed that since the arrival of the big-box stores, 50 percent of clothing stores, 30 percent of hardware stores and 29 percent of shoe stores have closed.

Employees of the corporation are kept under a wage ceiling, limiting any chance for raises or advance in rank. Often, the hours of employees are intentionally kept just under 40 a week so the company can avoid paying a full-time salary and providing decent benefits. To ensure its power to do this, Wal-Mart is incredibly anti-union and has illegally fired people in the past for showing interest in organizing.

When faced with a decision like this, we need to analyze not just the projected revenue from an additional Wal-Mart store, but also weigh possible negative effects on the community. Is this the type of neighbor we wish to have in Lawrence?

Tyler French,

Lawrence