To the editor:

Dec. 4, Diana Carlin, dean of the Graduate School and International Programs, and David Shulenburger, provost and executive vice chancellor, held a meeting outlining changes affecting KU’s departmental graduate programs.

Carlin and Shulenburger repeatedly referred to “mechanical change” in the application process. I didn’t understand the use of “mechanical.” Applicants shouldn’t feel we are a machine. Eliminating the graduate division was not a “mechanical change.” It was an unfortunate action that will affect every department. If current attitude reflects the belief that these changes are “mechanical,” I understand why we see dissatisfaction among faculty and staff.

Many issues we raised couldn’t be addressed satisfactorily. Asking us to make changes without attention to every aspect reflects the “mechanical” mindset the administration appears to have of staff.

I found it shameful that KU’s administration didn’t acknowledge Kathy Mason and RaeAnn Brown of the graduate division for their service. I understand KU must make sacrifices due to finances. I don’t understand why no administrator expressed disappointment at the unfortunate effects of sacrifice.

Change is always difficult. Change made without apparent concern for those affected is disastrous. To promote a positive work force, those in charge must show concern for employees, respect for their fears and feelings, and compassion when unfortunate decisions are made. KU’s administration failed at all these today.

I hope future decisions :quot; and meetings :quot; take into account the human needs of all involved.

Lydia Ash,

Lawrence