Jury finds driver who crashed into Big Mill guilty of multiple crimes, including aggravated battery and drunk driving
photo by: Kim Callahan/Journal-World Photo
After six hours of deliberation, a Douglas County jury on Wednesday found a Lawrence man who crashed into a Lawrence restaurant two years ago guilty of multiple crimes, including two counts of aggravated battery and multiple counts of drunk and reckless driving.
Brandon Vess, 31, crashed his SUV into the Big Mill restaurant at 900 Mississippi St. on Nov. 4, 2022, injuring three people inside and causing substantial damage to the historic building.
Those facts were never in doubt. What jurors had to grapple with was what exactly led to the crash.
Deputy District Attorney David Greenwald argued at trial that it was a straightforward case of Vess driving drunk — twice the legal limit at .16 — and losing control of his vehicle on wet pavement as he sped down Ninth Street at 58 mph — twice the speed limit — and crashed into the corner of the building, where the three injured diners had been sitting. The evidence, he said, supported no other scenario.
Defense attorney Nicholas Hayes, however, sought to convince the jury that “something else” caused the collision, such as faulty brakes or another car hitting Vess’ and forcing it into the building, rendering Vess free from all blame. As to Vess’ speed, Hayes said that could be accounted for by his tires spinning — the rotations per minute, or RPMs, making it appear that the car was moving fast when it was just moving in place.
Hayes maintained that the most important evidence — the car — had been destroyed, preventing testing of its brakes, and he additionally accused the police of zeroing in on the driver as the cause of the wreck and “ignoring” other possible explanations.
“Something happened to his vehicle that caused it to spin out,” Hayes told jurors. “I don’t know what.”
But Hayes’ own witness, a Lawrence police detective who investigated the crash, did not offer support for any of Hayes’ theories. Instead, his testimony aligned far more closely with the state’s explanation of the case.
Hayes also sought to convince the jury that the bloody cuts and bruising suffered by the victims, at least one of whom said she required help getting out from the building’s rubble, did not constitute bodily harm.
photo by: Submitted
photo by: Kim Callahan