To the editor:

The letter, “Judicial climate,” (Journal-World, Oct. 18), concerns a statutory rape case decided by Judge Paula Martin. According to the author, “both the judge and the jurors, who heard all the evidence on both sides, reportedly felt that the sentence that was ordered was necessary in the interest of justice.”

Perhaps, but without interviewing the jury, such a statement is simply presumptuous. After all, the jury is not responsible for sentencing. The jury is only responsible for the verdict. On the basis of that verdict, therefore, we question Martin’s deviation from a minimum 13-year sentence to 60 days.

Again, according to the author, “Douglas County’s group of district judges may well be the finest in the state.” Perhaps, but under Kansas law they are still subject to review. This being so, it is necessary for the residents of Douglas County to exercise discretion in their retention vote. Some may regard this as an unwelcome precedent. I consider it an unavoidable responsibility.

Michael Riley,

Lawrence