Advertisement

LJWorld.com weblogs Town Talk

Zarco stations begin selling E-15 product again after ending 28-year relationship with Phillips 66

Advertisement

For an hour today, you'll get to be a part of a fight, and you'll get a discount to do it.

The Lawrence-based Zarco convenience store chain is offering $1.99 gasoline from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at its location at 1500 E. 23rd Street. . But here's the catch: The $1.99 price is only for the E-15 brand of gasoline, which is fuel that contains 15 percent ethanol rather than the more standard 10 percent blend of ethanol. (Previously I reported the special was at all of his locations, but station leaders and I miscommunicated. My apologies.)

And E-15 is what the fight is about. Zarco leader Scott Zaremba last year became the first gasoline station owner in America to begin selling the E-15 product. But as we reported in June, Zarco stations had to stop selling the blend after the company found itself in a battle with its marketing/distribution partner, big oil company Phillips 66. Phillips was requiring Zaremba to install new pumps in order to sell E-15.

Well, you have perhaps noticed that the signs have changed at Zarco stations in the past few weeks. Zaremba confirmed he's bought his way out his contract with Phillips 66 — a company he's been with for 28 years — and has converted the stations over to a true independent operation. He's rebranded his eight stations in Lawrence, Ottawa and the Kansas City area as American Fuels stations. With the change, he's brought back the E-15 fuel.

"We are back to where we were 29 years ago, a complete independent," Zaremba said. "We will still guarantee all of our products like we always have."

But Zaremba certainly is bucking a decades long trend of gasoline stations affiliating with a major refinery company. Zaremba said he no longer felt that was possible for his company if it wants to truly promote alternative fuel products.

"We feel like we're not in the gas station business anymore," Zaremba told me. "We're in the transportation energy business. That's a big deal to us, because we really believe we can't just rely on gasoline anymore."

Zaremba, who has been trying to work a deal with city leaders to build a compressed natural gas fueling station that would allow the city to convert some of its fleet to natural gas, said he believes Philips 66 was trying to make the sale of E-15 gasoline unnecessarily difficult.

A Phillips 66 spokesman previously has said that's not the case. The company required the changes in selling standards to ensure that the E-15 product wouldn't mistakenly be used by motorists who have vehicles that aren't rated for E-15 use.

The EPA recommends that only vehicles 2001 or newer use the E-15 blend.

But Zaremba said the end result was the new changes made it next to impossible for his company to sell the product. That's because Phillips' new regulations would force him to install new pumps for the E-15 product under a separate canopy away from the main set of fuel pumps. He's convinced Phillips 66 and other big oil companies simply don't want E-15 to gain marketshare in the U.S. because it would significantly cut into their oil sales.

"Change can be difficult, especially for companies that are making billions of dollars off of us," Zaremba said. "They saw something that was going to threaten their income, and they responded."

Zaremba declined to give details about how much it cost his company to end its contract with Phillips 66, other than to say, "it was very expensive."

Nationally, E-15 hasn't gained traction with consumers. Zaremba said only a fraction of gasoline stations currently offer the product, and he said he expects big oil companies to run a negative publicity campaign against the ethanol product.

You'll have to decide for yourself what statements you want to believe about the product. The EPA has deemed the product safe for vehicles 2001 and newer. But some auto manufacturers say use of E-15 will void warranties on vehicles 2012 and older. AAA, the auto club, also issued a statement late last year urging gasoline retailers to halt the sale of E-15 until greater safeguards against vehicle damage can be put in place.

For his part, Zaremba said the EPA testing of the product's safety for vehicle engines was extensive, and he said none of his customers has reported a problem.

"We had the same deal when we went from leaded gasoline to unleaded gasoline," Zaremba said. "People thought nothing was going to work, and everything ended up working just fine."

The fight continues, and Lawrence once again is on the frontlines.

More LJWorld City Coverage

  • Town Talk blog
  • Local news
  • Sign up for the Town Talk newsletter
  • Follow @clawhorn_ljw on Twitter
  • Comments

    alm77 12 months ago

    Ah, man! I just filled up last night. Good on you, Zarco!

    0

    Currahee 12 months ago

    I generally stay away from e10 and e15 if possible. You get lower gas mileage and it corrodes auto parts well. If you look at FFVs they have a different maintenance schedule when you use E85. Ethanol is okay for countries like Brazil who use I think cane sugar. It is more efficient. But when water supplies are dwindling- we are effectively trading water for fuel. Ethanol is not a long term solution to our problem.

    9

    Rick Hird 12 months ago

    Zarco is a local business that leads by example when it comes to alternative fuels. Thank you, Scott Zaremba. We need more innovative business leaders like you!

    0

    zackattackku 12 months ago

    Ethanol is still terrible for your engine. Doesn't improve fuel economy and causes your engine to wear faster than it would without Ethanol. Go to Westside 66 on 6th street if you want real non-ethanol based fuel.

    5

    Bike 12 months ago

    Boss Hogg all the way. Hard time believing anything he says. I still don't think that turbine on 9th is hooked up to anything.

    1

    nwtransplant 12 months ago

    I've used e10 fuels since the mid 80's and have never experienced any problems. We need to grow more sugar cane in this country, because you can produce a lot more ethanol from it than corn.

    0

    Richard Heckler 12 months ago

    WE have been advised not use alternative fuels in our 2001 vehicle through the dealership because it has created problems.

    Using corn as a base for fuel has increased the food product cost. Shouldn't be doing that.

    How about a new farm industry that requires no toxic chemicals and no irrigation system. Perhaps it's time to move toward switch grass farms for fuel purposes?

    0

    Scott Morgan 12 months ago

    Without knowing the fuel contained alcohol filled up a brand new boat tank with it. Early 1990s. In fact did not read the manual, which stated specifically not to use it. The motor never ever ran very well, and the first time we had the boat out was ruined.

    0

    Commenting has been disabled for this item.