LJWorld.com weblogs Town Talk

Details emerge on why state rejected proposed Clinton Lake resort; update on Eagle Bend golf course


I don't know about you, but relaxing at a lakeside resort sounds like a pretty good idea today. A resort along Clinton Lake, however, may require me to get out my special thermal, full-length swimming trunks on this crisp day.

No reason to get your hopes up on that front anyway. As we reported earlier this month, the latest idea for a Clinton Lake resort is dead. Well, now we have more details about why. The state has released the lone proposal it received for a Clinton Lake Resort, and it had a pretty interesting twist: Kind-of, sort-of, the resort would have been owned by the city and the county.

The proposal submitted by LodgeWell Resorts called for a nonprofit ownership structure. According to the documents released by the state, a nonprofit hotel corporation would have been formed, and the city and the county would have appointed its board.

(Think of the possibilities. We could have started having City Commission meetings at the resort. Forget using Twitter to get people engaged in meetings. Offer free massages.)

Well, city and county commissioners never got to the point of having to consider participating in the project because state officials deemed it unfeasible. The idea was that a private company would have had a contract to operate the resort, but not own it. Based on the documents released, it looks like the project would have been financed by "tax-exempt hotel revenue bonds." That implies that the revenue from the hotel would have paid off the bondholders. I couldn't tell from the documents who would pay off the bondholders if the hotel didn't produce enough revenue.

At this point, it is all water under the bridge, but I thought it was interesting information to share because it provides a glimpse at how difficult it may be to get a feasible resort proposal for Clinton, at least in today's marketplace.

The proposal also included some other details:

— The hotel initially would have been 120 rooms with a restaurant, bar, bistro and conference center. Later phases would have included a 60-room expansion of the hotel, cabins, an "event pavilion" and a chapel.

— Developers had selected a 65-acre site in the state park for the project. The documents didn't do a great job of showing its location, but it appeared to be on the elevated point just south and east of the existing swimming beach.

— The project had an estimated phase I cost of $26.4 million. Average room rates were projected at $143 to $168 per night over the next five years.

— In addition to the four-story hotel, the concept plan showed a boat dock, tennis courts and sports fields, a "challenge course" complete with rope bridge and climbing wall, a spa and on-site hiking and biking trails.

— Developers described the design of the facility as "inspired by hunting and fishing lodges of the Midwest, using rubble stone, roughhewn logs, and shake shingles."

— LodgeWell, a relatively new company based in the Kansas City area, did attract a veteran resort designer to the project. PGAV designed the original Big Cedar Lodge resort in Branson, Mo., and also has designed many of the region's larger casino hotels.

The leaders of the state's Department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism still believe that a resort idea is feasible at the lake. City Manager David Corliss has confirmed that his office has met with the leader of the state's wildlife and parks department to discuss the state's continuing interest.

I wouldn't be surprised if the state issues another request for proposals at some point in the future. I would expect a new request for proposals to make it clear that the state is open to smaller resort concepts, and also would provide more details about how the city of Lawrence could be involved in the project, such as through the extension of city utilities to the state park site.

The big question will be whether changing the parameters of the project will change the level of interest from resort developers. Perhaps we'll see.

Speaking of changing, I guess I might as well change out of these swimming trunks.

In other news and notes from around town:

• While we're in the general vicinity, we might as well report some news about the Eagle Bend Golf Course below the Clinton Lake Dam. The course has attracted a well-known name in Lawrence golf circles. Jon Zylstra, the longtime pro at Lawrence Country Club, has left that position to become a golf pro at the city-owned Eagle Bend. He started in the position this week.

Parks and recreation officials told me earlier that they were excited to have him join the staff because of his contacts with local businesses and potential sponsors of golf tournaments and events at the course.

"And we're really going to charge him with making our junior golf program at the course awesome," said Mark Hecker, parks and recreation's assistant director.

The golf course will be looking for a bounce-back year in 2014. Through the first three quarters of the year, rounds and revenue are down at the course. Golfers through September had played 19,374 rounds, which was a 9 percent decrease from the same period in 2012. Revenue is down about $25,000, or 3.6 percent, to $683,000. But parks and recreation officials also have cut expenses by about 8 percent to keep the course from operating at a deficit. Department officials are projecting that the course will finish the year with revenues over expenses of about $50,000, although they note that will involve deferring some maintenance and equipment purchases.

And yes, because I know it is a point of consternation with some, it is worth noting that Eagle Bend's financials don't include all of its expenses. The course, for example, does not pay for the debt service on its bonds. Those bonds are paid through general city tax revenues.

• If adding a new golf pro at Eagle Bend provides a boost, maybe adding a swimming pro will do the same for the city's aquatics program. I hear Michael Phelps isn't doing a lot these days. Swimming activity in the city was down significantly in 2013, but parks and recreation leaders said a portion of that was a result of odd weather patterns that hurt the outdoor pool.

Revenue at the outdoor pool was down 6 percent compared to last year. Thus far, revenue at the indoor pool is down 11 percent from a year ago. One other area in the parks and recreation department also suffered a significant decline: Adult sports, which includes the city's popular softball leagues, is down 7 percent through September.

On the other side of the equation, enrollment in parks and recreation classes continues to grow. Class revenue is up 6 percent compared to a year ago. Youth sports, which the city is betting heavily on at Rock Chalk Park, basically held steady for the year, with revenues up 1 percent to $200,000 through September.

Overall, the city is projecting its recreation budget will finish the year with a deficit of between $30,000 and $80,000. It has reserve funds to cover that shortfall.

A concept plan submitted in 2013 for a proposed resort at Clinton Lake State Park. - Courtesy State of Kansas

A concept plan submitted in 2013 for a proposed resort at Clinton Lake State Park. - Courtesy State of Kansas by Chad Lawhorn

More LJWorld City Coverage

  • Town Talk blog
  • Local news
  • Sign up for the Town Talk newsletter
  • Follow @clawhorn_ljw on Twitter
  • Comments

    Matthew Herbert 4 years, 7 months ago

    so.....sort of like Rock Chalk Park then? In that, it would be a private endeavor, without any of the usual risk associated with a private endeavor, but ALL of the tax benefits of a public project.

    Richard Heckler 4 years, 7 months ago

    It seems the city is wanting to cater towards the 1% instead of taking care of the community as a whole.

    In general to many fiscal aspects of the park department/golf course aren't doing so well. Maybe taxpayers are tired of getting duped on so many projects? Eagle Bend has been a mediocre project at best from day one no matter how many tax dollars city hall spends. For 25 years or so. There are no golf courses in Lawrence setting the world on fire.... can we say to damn many. The 1% image is not producing but it is going in the hole..... at the expense of the 99%.

    Instead of going down the road to nowhere why not spend tax dollars directly on taxpayers by moving forward on fixing the sidewalks in this city that need fixing? Make exercise convenient.

    Adding more shared use paths on the east side for a change. Yes we know taxpayers use these shared use paths. For walking,jogging,cycling and are great for those with strollers who happen to be strolling along with a friend or two. Again we know taxpayers use these paths no question about it. Share use paths are a winner in Lawrence,Kansas.

    Richard Heckler 4 years, 7 months ago

    "Think of the possibilities. . Forget using Twitter to get people engaged in City Commission meetings. Offer free massages."

    Chad is on to something I say. Hats off.

    Richard Heckler 4 years, 7 months ago

    If my memory serves me well Eagle Bend was not popular among a large number of taxpayers before it came to reality. 25 years later those taxpayers were correct in their assertion that Lawrence did not need that municipal golf course for the demand simply did not exist.

    As more new private golf courses get built the demand for Eagle Bend will continue to drop.

    "Jon Zylstra, the longtime pro at Lawrence Country Club, has left that position to become a golf pro at the city-owned Eagle Bend. He started in the position this week."

    Usually the one factor that draws a good name away from another position is money. As a taxpayer I am curious how much are taxpayers paying Jon?

    What magic does Jon bring to a troubled golf course?

    Build things and they will come has not been a proven policy for Lawrence,Kansas going on 28 years. Perhaps it's time to adopt a proven theory form of government rather than a government based sheer speculation theory?

    Commenting has been disabled for this item.