Entries from blogs tagged with “Town Talk”

City to consider reducing number of lanes on portion of Kasold Drive; new info on pending appointment of commissioner; report estimates Rock Chalk tourneys add $4.4 million to economy

I know there have been times when I’ve been a passenger in my family’s Ford Taurus — like when we go around the curve at 31st and Kasold — that I’ve thought about becoming a full-time pedestrian. But then the G-forces subside, and I again become a bit uncertain about the notion that Lawrence residents are going to be less reliant on cars in the future. But maybe they will. City commissioners on Tuesday will be trying to figure that out.

Commissioners are receiving a recommendation from engineers to reduce the number of lanes on a portion of Kasold Drive when it is rebuilt next year. City engineers are recommending that the section of Kasold Drive between Eighth Street and 14th Street be reduced to one lane of traffic in each direction, down from the current configuration of two lanes of traffic in each direction. The road would include a center turn lane. Engineers also are recommending a single-lane roundabout at Harvard Road and Kasold, which further will reduce the capacity of the road.

It has not been the norm for growing cities to reduce the size of their major streets, but engineers say the numbers back them up on this one. There just aren’t going to be that many more people driving on this section of Kasold Drive over the next 20 years, engineers say. The current peak hour traffic volumes for this section of Kasold are 651 vehicles per hour. By 2040, that peak hour demand is only expected to grow to 736 vehicles per hour. Engineer say a single-lane road can carry up to 1,900 vehicles per hour, although that number drops to closer to 1,250 per hour if the road includes a single-lane roundabout.

Either way, engineers say those numbers point to a single-lane road being able to handle the projected traffic volumes for the next 20 years. Engineers also are estimating that reducing the number of lanes on the road will make it more feasible to build bike lanes and pedestrian features. The concept plan for this stretch of Kasold calls for bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the street. Pedestrian advocates also will like that having fewer lanes means it should be easier for pedestrians to cross the street.

Engineers are estimating reducing the number of lanes on the street will result in savings of about $1 million in construction costs. That’s certainly a number that city commissioners will like. But the number that probably deserves the most scrutiny is whether traffic volumes on this section of Kasold will actually grow by less than 1 percent per year. If traffic volumes grow at a more significant rate during the next two decades, commissioners may regret the decision to reduce the size of the road.

I’m no traffic engineer (I’m pretty sure my efforts to reinforce the handle I hold onto while in the passenger’s seat don’t count,) but engineers are expressing confidence in the projections. They note that traffic volumes on that stretch of Kasold from 1995 to 2013 have grown by about 0.4 percent per year. They’re using a projection of 0.5 percent growth per year for the next 20 years.

In case you are wondering, the section of road has about 14,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day on it, according to Kansas Department of Transportation figures. But it is worth noting that the numbers have been a little unpredictable over the years. In 1998, for example, traffic volumes were near 18,000 on portions of the road. In 2004, they were near 17,000. If the road starts seeing those type of volumes again, that could change the long-term outlook for the corridor.

The city has had a meeting with neighbors and businesses in the area. The reaction to reducing the road to one lane in each direction has been mixed. Some have liked the idea of making the road more pedestrian friendly and the slower speeds that would come with the one-lane road. Others, though, have said it will make it difficult for people who have driveways along the road, and they note that currently traffic flows on that road very well.

Commissioners will sort it out at Tuesday’s meeting, which begins at 5:45 p.m. at City Hall.

In other news and notes from around town:

• Commissioners of course will be meeting before then. There is a special meeting at 2 p.m. today to formally accept the resignation of Jeremy Farmer, the former executive director of Just Food who resigned that job after conceding he had failed to pay about $50,000 in federal withholding taxes for the food bank.

Commissioners also will get an update on some credit card charges that Farmer incurred on his city-issued credit card. We reported on that yesterday, and we’re still sorting through those documents, and we’re also attempting to get more information from Just Foods leaders about the extent of the financial issues that the important nonprofit is facing.

But commissioners today will primarily be figuring out how to fill Farmer’s spot on the five-member commission. City Hall officials this morning posted this presentation spelling out some the guidelines and regulations related to filling a vacant position.

Probably the key takeaway from the presentation is that city code does not address the method for selecting a commissioner. Instead, the code provides discretion to the remaining members to come up with a selection process. The presentation provides only one example of how Lawrence has replaced a commissioner in the past. In January of 1970, Dr. Robert Hughes resigned from the commission. The remaining commissioners nominated and selected a former commissioner and mayor to replace Hughes on the commission. That all happened on the same day that the commission received Hughes’ resignation. The new member was sworn in at the next regularly scheduled meeting, which was three days later.

I don’t expect this to go that fast, but I think figuring out how quickly the commission can proceed will be a topic of discussion today.

• This item probably deserves more attention than I’m able to give it at the moment, but the city has a new report out that estimates the economic impact of tournaments held thus far at the recreation center at Rock Chalk Park.

The city estimates the 29 tournaments that have been held at Sports Pavilion Lawrence since late December have pumped $4.4 million into the local economy. The numbers are based on interviews the city has conducted with tournament organizers to determine the number of people who attend the tournaments and also the number of attendees who are staying overnight in the city.

The hotel spending has been significant, ranging all the way from about $3,500 to a high of $121,000 for a 98-team volleyball tournament in March. The city then uses a multiplier figure to estimate how much attendees are spending on other expenses while in Lawrence. Those figures have ranged from about $45,000 to a high of about $500,000 for an 80-team basketball tournament in late July.

I’ve certainly heard from some restaurants and others business owners that they notice when large tournaments are at Rock Chalk Park. City budget makers also should notice too. If the center has pumped an additional $4.4 million into the local economy, the city and county should collect about an additional $110,000 in sales tax revenues, with several hundred thousand more going to the state.

Reply 68 comments from Carol Bowen John Hampton George Lippencott Jake Hess Thesychophant Michael Napier Sue McDaniel Bob Smith Brent Mowery Chris Tilden and 20 others

City commissioner says some travel expenses by former Mayor Jeremy Farmer have drawn questions; city expected to release details today; Soden talks about pending appointment

I’ve gotten word this morning that Lawrence City Hall will be releasing some information about some travel expenses from former Mayor Jeremy Farmer.

Commissioner Leslie Soden, who is serving as acting mayor for the city following Farmer’s resignation yesterday, told me she is directing City Hall to release information about some travel expenses of Farmer that have been called into question. I had received a tip that there may be some questions related to some travel expenses, and I was in the process of preparing an open records request to City Hall. Soden said after Farmer’s resignation and the mounting questions related to finances at Just Food — see our article about its 2014 tax return — she decided that the city needed to be proactive in addressing the travel expenses with the public.

I don’t yet have the full details related to the travel expenses, but Soden confirmed that Farmer has repaid the city for some travel expenses that previously were paid for through city funds. I don’t know what type of amounts we are talking about. Soden said City Hall staff members had been working on resolving the travel expense issues with Farmer for the last month or so. She said commissioners were just recently notified of the issue.

I put a call into Farmer this morning, but had no luck in contacting him.

I think it is important that we recognize where we are at with this story at the moment: Details are few, and we don’t yet understand the extent of what questions the expenses have created. But these are very unusual times at City Hall right now, and I felt it is important that you know that City Hall officials, in addition to Just Food leaders, are looking into financial matters related to Farmer.

Soden expects the city will release information at some point today, but she’s just now begun working with city staff on crafting a release.

I also had a chance to talk with Soden about her thoughts on the selection process of a new commissioner to fill the vacant term of Farmer. She said she very much favors a process that can be wrapped up in a relatively short period of time. We had an article yesterday where Commissioner Matthew Herbert speculated that it could take 60 to 90 days to fill the position. Soden said she thought that time period was too long.

“I think the sooner the better,” Soden said. “I don’t think drawing this out is going to help the situation. We just need to find someone who we all can like.”

Soden said it is important for the commission to find a candidate who can receive unanimous support from the remaining four commissioners.

“We don’t need a split vote on this,” Soden said. “That would put the new person in a terrible position.”

Soden offered no names for consideration during our conversation, but she said finding someone with experience would be important. That could be a past city commissioner, a past county commissioner, or maybe even someone who has served on key city boards, such as the Planning Commission.

Soden, however, said she doesn’t think it is feasible to consider anyone from the previous City Commission that left office in April.

“I’m not looking for anyone who had served on the most recent commission,” Soden said.

Mike Dever, Terry Riordan and Bob Schumm all left that commission following the April elections. Riordan and Schumm both sought re-election but lost. Dever did not seek a new term, which would have been his third.

It is not surprising that Soden has concerns about tapping someone from that commission. Those three commissioners all were supporters of the Rock Chalk Park project, while the three newly-elected commissioners — Soden, Herbert and Stuart Boley — all campaigned on a platform that change was needed following that controversial public-private partnership.

We’ll let you know what other details develop today.

Reply 37 comments from Jan Brocker Richard Heckler Derek Coyne Hudson Luce Paul Silkiner Thesychophant Sarah Johnson Tadgh David Holroyd Richard Crank and 13 others

East Lawrence coffee shop seeks to add liquor, bistro concept; city tries to restart stalled project to address North Lawrence flooding

I don’t know how many glasses of chardonnay it will take to make The Kaw look like The Seine, but we may soon find out. An East Lawrence coffee shop has filed plans to convert itself into a French-style bistro, complete with alcohol.

Decade, the coffee shop at 920 Delaware St., has filed for a drinking establishment license, and city commissioners are scheduled to give the license its necessary approvals at tonight’s meeting.

Louis Wigen-Toccalino, owner of Decade, said the plan is to broaden the concept of the approximately one-year old coffee shop.

“The model is very much like a Parisian-style, French bistro where people come together to share conversation and ideas, and you do it around food and drink,” Wigen-Toccalino said. “We opened with coffee because that is the tone we wanted to establish.”

Louis Wigen-Toccalino owner of Decade Coffee and Espresso, 920 Delaware Street, pours hot water into an AeroPress to make a single cup of coffee. Coffee is steeped for between 10-50 seconds and then forced through a filter by pressing the plunger through the tube.

Louis Wigen-Toccalino owner of Decade Coffee and Espresso, 920 Delaware Street, pours hot water into an AeroPress to make a single cup of coffee. Coffee is steeped for between 10-50 seconds and then forced through a filter by pressing the plunger through the tube. by Mike Yoder

But Wigen-Toccalino said not everyone wants coffee at all hours of the day, so he’s seeking a liquor license so he can serve a selection of wines, beers and cordials. In addition, the coffee shop will expand its food menu. The shop already has started serving a sandwich menu for lunch — a fancy ham and cheese with white cheddar and pickled corn is one example — and plans to have an evening food menu as well. Wigen-Toccalino said in addition to sandwiches, the menu will include meat and cheese plates, a host of bar snacks, salads, and some steamed dishes or stew in the fall and winter.

Wigen-Toccalino said hours of the shop probably will be extended to 10 p.m. or 11 p.m. on most nights. But he said he doesn’t have plans to operate a traditional bar that stays open until the early morning hours.

“We want to stay a neighborhood establishment,” he said. “We want to keep the same atmosphere we have today.”

That’s probably been a key reason the proposal hasn’t yet run into neighborhood opposition. Another key point is that the establishment will have some regulations it will have to meet in regard to how much liquor it can sell. Scott McCullough, the city’s planning director, told me the property’s current zoning allows for a restaurant but not a bar use. The city defines a restaurant as one that makes at least 55 percent of its revenue from the sale of food rather than alcohol. Businesses that make more than 45 percent of their revenue from alcohol sales are considered bars or lounges, and they aren’t allowed in the limited industrial zoning district where Decade is located. So, bottom line, the city will have to monitor the sales tax and liquor tax receipts of Decade periodically to determine whether it is consistently meeting the minimum food sales requirement. (Coffee counts as food, is my understanding.)

City commissioners are dealing with a slightly different issue a little more than a block away. At Eighth and Pennsylvania streets, the developer of the Warehouse Arts District is seeking to open a bistro in a small building next to the Poehler Lofts and the Cider Gallery. But the development group there is seeking an exemption from the 55 percent food sales requirement. The proposed building for the bistro is a small one, and won’t have a kitchen space. But plans call for at least one or more food trucks to be set up outside the business, allowing patrons of the bistro to buy food from the trucks and consume it in the bistro, along with the drink of their choice. The development group has said it wants food to be a major focus on the new bistro, but it has struggled to find an operator for the bistro that is willing to invest the considerable money needed to open the business with the possibility that the city could close the business if it falls below the 55 percent food requirement.

Some neighbors have objected to the Eighth and Pennsylvania proposal. The Lawrence-Douglas County Planning Commission has recommended approval of the bistro plans, but it is unclear whether the project has the three necessary votes on the City Commission.

The City Commission is tentatively scheduled to discuss the Eighth and Pennsylvania proposal at its meeting next week.

In other news and notes from around town:

• Whether you call it The Kaw or The Seine or just a whole bunch of muddy water, the folks in North Lawrence know quite a bit about the problems unwanted water can cause. The area is prone to storm water flooding, and fixing the issue has been on the city’s to-do list for quite some time.

One of the larger projects to help control storm water flooding in North Lawrence has been a planned pump station at Sixth and Maple streets. The project was one that was highlighted by the city as a reason voters should approve a new 0.3 percent infrastructure sales tax in 2008. The project, though, hasn’t yet been built. Other projects, mainly road projects, got in line ahead of the pump station, and then rising construction costs delayed the project again.

But commissioners will take some action tonight to get the project restarted. Commissioners will set a bid date of Sept. 1 to bid the project. North Lawrence leaders likely will be watching that closely to see if the project comes in at a more budget-friendly number. In March, the city bid the project and received only two bidders. One bidder pegged the project at $7.5 million while the other came in at $8 million. Engineers had estimated the costs at $5.1 million. That’s when the city decided to go back to the drawing board and see if they could make some design changes to lower the costs.

There are several changes that have been recommended, but the long and short of it is that the city is now proposing a less powerful pump station for North Lawrence. The new plan calls for a pump station that can handle 100 cubic feet of water per second. That’s down from the original design of 195 cubic feet per second. Engineers said they’re comfortable with the change after they “re-evaluated the hydrologic criteria.” It seems like a significant change, but thus far North Lawrence leaders have not objected.

Commissioners meet at 5:45 p.m. tonight at City Hall.


Neighbors concerned about stalled construction near Peterson and Monterey; city, KU transit system named tops in state; a bus hub question for Centennial Park

Neighbors are wondering why the weeds are so tall. This is the point that I usually stammer, panic and blurt out something about the flux capacitor being broken on my lawn mower. But for once, we’re not talking about my yard. Several Lawrence residents instead are concerned about why construction seemingly has halted on a multimillion dollar elder care complex at Peterson and Monterey Way in northwest Lawrence

As we’ve previously reported, Columbia-Mo.-based Americare has filed plans to build a new assisted living/retirement community at the southwest corner of the intersection. Dirt work on the project began several months ago, but work at the site has been halted for several weeks now. I got calls from multiple neighbors wondering whether the project was still happening, or whether the vacant ground was destined to become a weed patch.

No worries on that front, an Americare official told me. The project is still very much alive, but is awaiting its building permits from the city, said Neal Slattery, a staff engineer for Americare. He said the company expects to receive the building permits in a matter of days, and construction of the actual buildings will begin right away. You don’t need building permits to do dirt work on the site, so the company started that process early, and had hoped the building permits would be ready at the time it was completed. But there was a bit of a gap.

“It is soon going to be full speed ahead,” Slattery said. “We’re absolutely doing the project.”

In case you have forgotten, the project will focus on providing Alzheimer’s and other memory care to residents. But the project also will include several units of independent and assisted living for seniors, plus a clubhouse to host activities and such. The project ties in with the latest concept of allowing people to age at a single development, but move to different facilities as their needs change.

In terms of size, the last plans I’ve seen for the project were filed in January. They called for a large assisted living building that has 30 one-bedroom units, a separate facility with a mix of about 15 one- and two-bedroom units that will be for the memory-care portion of the development. In addition, there is an area that would house about six duplex structures.

Slattery believes neighbors ultimately will be pleased with the final product.

“They’re all single-story buildings, so it will be very residential in nature,” he said. “It should fit in seamlessly. Any traffic generation the project creates will be pretty minimal.”

Slattery said Americare — which operates senior living facilities throughout the Midwest — hopes to have the project open in about a year.

In other news and notes from around town:

• Lawrence’s public transit service has won a top statewide award. The T and Kansas University’s bus service have been named the fastest growing urban public transit system in the state, according to the Federal Transit Administration.

The federal officials looked at the ridership numbers during the federal government’s 2014 fiscal year — that’s an October to September time period — and found that Lawrence’s ridership numbers grew by 4 percent during the period to a total of 124,338 rides. That number includes riders on both city buses and university buses. Federal officials look at the city and university services as one system, although Lawrence and KU officials refer to it more as a “coordinated system” because the two entities share some costs but keep others separate.

“By working together, the city and university transit systems have been able to provide service that is working for bus riders in Lawrence,” Robert Nugent, the city’s transit administrator said in a release.

As I’ve noted before, it is an interesting time for the transit system. The city is likely going to need to put a sales tax question on the ballot in 2018 to replace the sales tax that currently funds the transit operations. The current sales tax is set to expire in 2019.

But also of note is that this City Commission, compared with past commissions, has had more discussions about whether the transit system is working adequately. There are concerns about the frequency of routes, and whether the current system makes riders go through the equivalent of going through Denver to get to Dallas.

Transit leaders have said they envision major changes to the city’s route system, if city commissioners will settle on a location for a transit hub. A new hub that is more centrally located — a hub is just a way saying a main transfer point for the bus system — would allow for greater route frequency. But commissioners are really struggling to find a location they can agree on. Last month they rejected a staff recommendation for a hub near 21st and Iowa streets on land that Kansas University Endowment is willing to provide to the city on a no-cost lease.

This latest award may provide some evidence that the bus system may be working better than some commissioners believe. But it probably would be useful to look at the ridership numbers in more detail. For example, how much of the ridership increase has come through service on city-operated buses versus how much has come through KU buses? That may provide a slightly different picture. However, it also may spark an important conversation. Does the community essentially have one bus system these days? You can catch a city bus and transfer to a KU bus. It would be an interesting discussion because I have heard some rumblings that some people think the transit system is too geared to KU. Others I’ve heard have said KU is the obvious and natural driver of ridership in the community.

• While we’re speaking of transit hubs, you might recall that one suggestion from Commissioner Stuart Boley was to consider whether a portion of Centennial Park near Ninth and Iowa could be used as a transit hub.

I recently had a reader make a keen observation about that idea. The reader pointed out that the city’s website includes some history about several of the major parks in Lawrence. On the section for Centennial Park, it mentions that the land for Centennial Park was sold “to the city of Lawrence for $1 on the condition that the property be eternally preserved as a public park.”

I haven’t done any research on the actual covenants on the land, but it looks like that would be an issue the city would have to research if there is any real interest in using Centennial for a bus hub location.

Reply 4 comments from Betty Bartholomew Mark Kostner David Holroyd Clara Westphal

Payless Furniture owner who said ‘Goodbye Obamaville’ back selling furniture in Lawrence; City Hall spends $2,500 on friendship garden

Perhaps you remember the flamboyant goodbye to Lawrence that came from the owner of Payless Furniture. If you don’t, I can give you the family-friendly version of that event: Payless owner Robert Fyfe in May parked his furniture delivery truck along the store’s busy Iowa Street frontage and plastered it with signs that proclaimed Lawrence the “commie & candy (rear-end) capitol of Kansas.” He also had a big one that said “Goodbye Obamaville.”

Well, I guess goodbye doesn’t mean what it used to because Fyfe is back peddling mattresses and other such furniture in Lawrence. Hey, even candied rears need a cheap mattress to rest upon, and you can’t blame a good communist for wanting a particle board coffee table. (What, are you going to just throw the manifesto on the floor?)

Fyfe, however, isn’t selling items under the Payless Furniture name, or at the store’s former Iowa Street location. He’s selling furniture out of a warehouse he owns on Bullene Avenue in eastern Lawrence. But the furniture is just stuff that he couldn’t sell at Payless before he closed.

I stopped by and asked Fyfe why he was still trying to sell goods in a town that he so clearly didn’t like. He was honest: money. It would cost him too much to ship the furniture somewhere else to sell. I asked him if he thought people might be mad that he was still trying to make a buck in a town that he essentially gave the one-finger salute to. He pulled no punches in that answer either.

“I couldn’t give one rat’s (rear end), to tell the truth,” Fyfe said. “(Expletive) Lawrence.”

But, hey, if you need a mattress . . .

Fyfe also tried to give me a bit of a hard time about bringing up his former business, Payless Furniture. He noted that he didn’t have that name anywhere on any of his signs advertising this “wholesale mattress and furniture sale.” I told him I happened to notice that. I asked him if he thought that omission might actually make some people more upset. How many folks may think they’re just getting a cheap mattress without knowing they’re supporting someone who gets their kicks trying to anger a whole host of people? (In addition to the political stuff, his signs in May also disparaged the developmentally disabled, the homeless, teachers and others.)

“They can kiss my (rear end),” Fyfe said. “If they don’t like it, (expletive) them.”

I’m sure if I would have stayed longer, the shtick would have gone on with the same old tired lines. That’s what you can count on from Fyfe: Despite a goodbye, it never really ends.

In other news and notes from around town:

• You really don’t have to worry about Fyfe reopening his store at 2800 Iowa St. As we’ve previously reported, Dale Willey Automotive has bought the property to expand its auto dealership. If you have driven by lately, you’ve noticed the building has been gutted and is getting a whole new exterior look.

I ran into one of the general managers of Dale Willey at last weekend’s 4-H livestock auction at the Douglas County Fair. He said he hopes to have the new showroom — which will house used cars — open in September.

Speaking of the livestock auction, I’ve meant for the last several days to say a thank-you to all the businesses and other buyers who supported the 4-H kids at the auction. (Full disclosure: That includes my two pig-raising kids.) The auction is just one of many worthy fundraising events that happen in Lawrence. This year’s auction had 145 animals that were sold and raised $183,809 for the 4-H kids who owned the livestock. That is kind of astounding.

Some other charities benefited as well. For example, Dale Willey continued its tradition of buying a couple of hogs and donating the meat to the food bank operated by Just Food, and I know at least one area church was the beneficiary of a large donation of meat as well. There were probably others, and I apologize for not knowing all of them. If you know them, feel free to list them below.

• I hope you take time to read Sara Shepherd’s piece on the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. Also, take time to read some of the articles that web editor Nick Gerik pulled together from the archives of the Journal-World during that time period. It gives you a sense of just how new and how many questions were emerging as the world tried to understand the Nuclear Age.

One article predicted that in a few years we all would be driving cars that had engines the size of “your hand.” We haven’t quite seen that yet, (unless you guys have larger hands than I think you do) but we have seen the world change a lot. There was one small reminder of that at Tuesday’s Lawrence City Commission meeting.

The timing was just coincidental, on the week that we’re remembering the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan, city commissioners agreed to spend $2,500 for a “friendship garden” in the homeland of our other great enemy in that war, Germany.

Lawrence has long had a sister city relationship with Eutin, Germany. Eutin is hosting the state garden show for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein in 2016, and as part of the event it plans to build a friendship garden honoring its relationship with Lawrence.

Commissioners, at the request of the Lawrence Sister Cities Advisory Board, agreed to donate $2,500 to the cause. The local Friends of Eutin group plans to raise another $1,500. Together, the Lawrence contribution will cover about half of the cost of the Eutin garden.

Plans call for the garden to have sunflower, prairie grasses, and some silhouettes of bison, prairie dogs and other animals that are native to the range. (Note to self: Round up some prairie dogs for Mass Street before the next Eutin group comes to visit. We don’t want to disappoint them.)

I’m sure the garden will be neat. What’s even neater, though, is to think about what can grow, if given 70 years of peace.

In addition to Eutin, Lawrence also has a sister city relationship with Hiratsuka, Japan.

Reply 14 comments from Sheila Couchman Archibald Katz Dorothyhoytreed Chris Phillips Richard Ballard Barb Gordon Rick Masters Bob Smith angie crenshaw Andrew Dufour and 3 others

Downtown retailer of 20 years closing Lawrence store; rumors of a new chicken chain on West Sixth Street; a Facebook flap at City Hall

Perhaps you don’t know it, Lawrence, but for the last 20 years you’ve been influencing how people across the country take baths. Yeah, now that I say that, it does sound creepy. But don’t worry, it is all fine, and it is also almost all over.

Bloom, the bath and body store at 704 Massachusetts St., is closing after 20 years in business. That’s notable in itself, but, come to find out, Bloom is more than just a little retail shop that you go to for bath products to get marinara sauce out of your beard. (The shop is right above Rudy’s Pizzeria, so I assume it gets the marinara question frequently.) Bloom also has been the test market store for a set of multimillion dollar bath and body brands that are manufactured in Colorado.

“Lawrence has definitely been where we test ideas,” said Lisa Sanders, manager of the Lawrence store. “It is interesting because what is popular in Lawrence doesn’t always end up being popular nationwide. Lawrence is pretty unique.”

But the company’s founders have their roots in the area. They are Baker University graduates, and Sanders is a longtime friend who has run the Lawrence store for the last 15 years. But Sanders said she has decided to take another career opportunity in the Kansas City area, and the business’ owners decided that was probably a good time to close the store.

Sanders said a date for the store to close hasn’t been set, but she said it could be soon. It will be dependent on the store’s inventory, and it is dwindling quickly. Sanders said the store has been very popular in drawing shoppers from the Kansas City area and elsewhere to downtown. She said many customers are coming in to say their goodbyes.

“We had one woman come in who said her husband was just devastated,” Sanders said. “He said he didn’t know where he was going to do his Christmas shopping anymore.”

Lisa Sanders, manager at Bloom, 704 Mass, rearranges product display in this file photo from 2012.

Lisa Sanders, manager at Bloom, 704 Mass, rearranges product display in this file photo from 2012.

To be clear, though, only the store is closing. The brands that store’s parent company produces are still very much alive and well. Sanders said for years the company has made the bulk of its money from its manufacturing business. The Lawrence store is the only one the company operates. The company’s products, however, are sold in retail outlets internationally, ranging from Neiman Marcus to boutiques.

Its bath, body and fragrance brands include TokyoMilk, Love & Toast, and Lollia, which is probably its most famous after Oprah named its bubble bath to her most favorite things list a few years ago.

Makes sense. Oprah is a mess with marinara sauce.

In other news and notes from around town:

• From sauce to a crispy, fried breading: I’m getting news that a new fast food chicken restaurant is coming to Lawrence. But I don’t know which one yet. A representative with the Bauer Farm development at Sixth and Wakarusa told me that a fast-food, chicken-oriented business is finalizing a deal for the lot next to the Burger King that is in the development. Are we on a Popeyes alert? Or maybe a Church’s Chicken watch? I really have no idea, but those are a couple of the larger chicken chains that don’t already have a presence in Lawrence.

• Let’s end this today with the tastiest of all morsels: a Facebook flap. City Commissioner Matthew Herbert has a discussion going on his Facebook page about how he’s unhappy with the process the city used to give preliminary approval to the budget last night.

In particular, he’s concerned that Commissioner Stuart Boley proposed a $100,000 change to the city’s budget after the official public hearing for the budget had been closed. The $100,000, as we reported from last night’s meeting, is for a transitional housing program. Herbert thinks Boley should have brought up the change prior to the public hearing so people could have commented on it if they so chose.

“The process was awful,” Herbert said.

Screenshot from the Facebook page for Lawrence City Commissioner Matthew Herbert.

Screenshot from the Facebook page for Lawrence City Commissioner Matthew Herbert.

I checked in with Boley about it this morning, and he had a different view. First, he noted that he spent 10 minutes talking about the $100,000 for transitional housing at the July 21 City Commission meeting. He was ready to add it to the proposed budget at that point, but his fellow commissioners said they wanted to wait until last night’s meeting to address the issue.

Secondly, Boley notes that prior to last night’s meeting, he had staff members add documents from the Lawrence-Douglas County Housing Authority to the budget portion of the city’s online agenda — which is accessible to the public. He said he had those documents added because he clearly intended on talking about the issue during the budget process. He forecast that at the July 21 meeting. He said it seemed reasonable to him to hear from the public, and then have a commission discussion about how it wanted to structure the budget.

“I didn’t feel like it was a big secret that I was looking for $100,000 for that program,” Boley said. “But I’m new. It is important to me that we do things in the right way. I care about process. I really do.”

Herbert also is a first-year commissioner. One of the new elements he’s bringing to the position is he’s working hard to create conversations about city business on Facebook. If you remember, he was the commissioner that got a lot of attention for his comments about the city of Topeka and its sewer plant.

His Facebook discussion on the topic includes some comments from city residents about how they were throwing things at the TV during last night’s proceedings and how the process is “jacked up” and how we “might have to make some noise” about this issue.

So, some folks are fired up. I would point out two more things: 1. This was the preliminary approval of the budget. It doesn’t become final until it is approved one more time on second reading by the commission, likely next week. There will be an opportunity for the public to comment on the budget again before the vote is taken. Commissioners can easily eliminate the $100,000, if that is the will of the commission. 2. The City Commission does not have a strict policy on public comments anymore. That has been a hallmark of Mayor Jeremy Farmer’s tenure. He routinely lets people make a comment even after the official public comment portion of an item has ended. My understanding is no one sought to make such a comment, although I also understand several members of the audience left the meeting before Boley brought up the $100,000 item.

We’ll see how big this morsel becomes.

Reply 13 comments from Kendall Simmons Lee Saylor Lawrence Freeman Thesychophant Colt Haines David Holroyd Melinda Henderson Cindy Bell Will White Barb Gordon and 3 others

Facts and figures to help you figure out whether to gripe or not to gripe about Lawrence’s property tax rates

Complaining about local taxes is easy. Figuring out whether we have a good gripe is hard because it requires lots of numbers, an abacus and stretching exercises. (I can’t count on my toes without the exercises anymore.) But as local governments get ready to approve their new tax rates, I’m limber and full of figures. So, let’s take a look.

As a reminder, we’re in the midst of budget seasons for the Lawrence City Commission, the Douglas County Commission and the Lawrence school board. City commissioners tonight will give preliminary approval to a budget that holds the property tax rate steady. Douglas County commissioners have reached a consensus on a budget that holds the county’s property tax rate steady as well. The Lawrence school board is considering a budget that would increase the property tax rate by about 1.6 mills, or about $30 on a $160,000 home.

The numbers I have for you take a look at what we’re paying in property taxes right now compared with what residents in other large cities in the state pay. I could just list the property tax mill levies for each city and call it good. Local government leaders would be pleased because the total mill levy paid in Lawrence is quite a bit less than in some other cities. Lawrence’s combined property tax mill levy is approximately 129 mills. Compare that with Kansas City’s at 174 mills or Topeka’s at 161 mills or Manhattan’s at 135 mills.

But I think there are two other factors you have to look at to get a full picture: the average value of a home in a community and the average wage for a full-time worker. The price of the home directly affects the size of your tax bill, and your wage affects your ability to pay it. I use home values from the 2009-2013 Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and I use a Census figure from the same source that estimate the median wage for a full-time, year round, male employee. I use that number because it factors out the thousands of college students who aren’t really in Lawrence to earn any money at the moment. I wish the Census Bureau made a combined male-female average year round wage available, but it is not in the tables that I’m looking at this morning.

Hopefully what these numbers will show you is if you are the Average Joe living in an average home in each of these communities, this is how much you will pay in property taxes, and this is how much of your paycheck it will take to pay those taxes. Obviously, everybody’s situation will be a bit different, but this is a math exercise aimed at making some fair comparisons.

So, here’s a look at Lawrence and the other nine Kansas communities with populations greater than 45,000 people:

— Lawrence: Property tax rate: 129.796 mills. Median home value: $178,500. Average earnings: $45,359. Total property tax: $2,664. Percent of earnings: 5.8 percent

— Kansas City, Kan.: Property tax rate: 173.412 mills. Median home value: $90,400. Average earnings: $37,844. Total property tax: $1,802. Percent of earnings: 4.7 percent

— Lenexa: Property tax rate: 106.193. Median home value: $218,900. Average earnings: $62,901. Total property tax: $2,673. Percent of earnings: 4.2 percent

— Manhattan: Property tax rate: 135.436 mills. Median home value: $180,800. Average earnings: $42,078. Total property taxes: $2,815. Percent of earnings: 6.6 percent

— Olathe: Property tax rate: 124.917 mills. Median home value: $193,800. Average earnings: $60,410. Total property taxes: $2,784. Percent of earnings: 4.6 percent.

— Overland Park: Property tax rate: 112.459 mills. Median home value: $223,800. Average earnings: $67,205. Total property taxes: $2,894. Percent of earnings: 4.3 percent

— Salina: Property tax rate: 133.852 mills. Median home value: $114,300. Average earnings: $38,251. Total property taxes: $1,759. Percent of earnings: 4.5 percent.

— Shawnee: Property tax rate: 121.407 mills. Median home value: $196,100. Average earnings: $59,981. Total property taxes: $2,737. Percent of earnings: 4.5 percent.

— Topeka: Property tax rate: 161.690 mills. Median home value: $95,600. Average earnings: $41,641. Total property taxes: $1,777. Percent of earnings: 4.2 percent.

— Wichita: Property tax rate: 119.844 mills. Median home value: $117,500. Average earnings: $45,288. Total property taxes: $1,619. Percent of earnings: 3.5 percent.

So, what to make of those numbers? Lawrence and Manhattan have higher tax rates compared to income than the other communities. Maybe that is because university communities have higher expectations for service levels from government. Maybe it is because the thousands of students drive up the price of real estate. Maybe it is because both communities don’t receive any property taxes from their largest employers — the universities. Maybe neither community captures enough retail sales, and thus they have to garner a larger percentage of their budgets from property taxes instead of sales taxes. Maybe it is because neither community has done enough to attract high-paying, high-tech jobs. I don’t know. But it is noteworthy, although not really new. I’ve done this type of figuring before, and the numbers consistently show Lawrence residents pay a bit of a premium to live here.

Most communities on the list end up having taxes that are somewhere in the 4 percent range of the average full-time wage of the community. If Lawrence could get taxes down to, let’s say, 4.5 percent of the average wage, that would result in a savings of about $600 per year for the Average Joe.

Another interesting tidbit from the numbers is that, evidently, there is a lot more that goes into making a community than its property tax rate. Both Lenexa and Topeka have taxes that are about 4.2 percent of the average earnings of a full-time worker. But Lenexa and Topeka are two very different communities, and many would argue are on different ends of the prosperity scale.

And then there is Wichita. It clearly has a lower tax rate than the others. But, like in any community, you have to look at whether you feel like you are getting a good value for what you spend. I’m not hating on Wichita, but the financial services firm WalletHub kind of is. The company this week put out a list of the best and worst large cities to live in. Wichita ranked near the bottom — 57 out of 62 cities that are greater than 300,000 in population. (Kansas City, in case you are wondering was No. 28) Wichita fared second to last in the education category, which is a big part of what your property tax dollars fund.

So, do Lawrence residents have a good reason to gripe about taxes? I don’t know, and furthermore I’ve got griping of my own to worry about. Complaints are mounting here. I think I’m going to have to put my shoes back on.

In other news and notes from around town:

• If you like talking about tax numbers and what the community should and should not become, then perhaps being part of the Lawrence chamber of commerce’s Leadership Lawrence program is your cup of tea. The chamber is wrapping up applications for the next multimonth session. The deadline to apply is 5 p.m. Aug. 10. You can find details about the cost and application process at LawrenceChamber.com.

Reply 3 comments from Notwhatyouthink2 Thesychophant Richard Heckler

Food trucks banding together to create new hub/restaurant along 23rd Street

Lawrence is getting creative with food and trucks, and I’m not just talking about my method for eating biscuits and gravy while still safely making the Kasold Curve. No, four area food trucks have joined forces to lease space along 23rd Street for a unique food truck hub.

The operators of Torched Goodness, Drasko’s, The Purple Carrot and Wilma’s Real Good Food have reached a deal to take over the spot formerly occupied by Granddaddy’s BBQ at 1447 W. 23rd St.

The new venture will be called Fork to Fender, and it will be a little bit restaurant and a little bit food truck. Chefs from each of the four food trucks have committed to have at least a portion of their food truck menus available each day at Fork to Fender. In addition, there will be certain days of the week where all the food trucks — plus some guest trucks from Kansas City — will be parked outside. Customers will be able to order their food from the trucks and then have the option of taking the food inside the Fork to Fender space.

The concept behind the idea is unique but simple, said Julia Ireland of Torched Goodness: Lawrence diners need to know there is a consistent location where they can always get food truck grub.

“Lawrence is a good town for food trucks, but we need to band together to get more of an awareness for food trucks,” Ireland said.

The joint location also will offer another benefit: the opportunity to have a liquor license. Food trucks in Lawrence aren’t allowed to have a liquor license. But by having a storefront, the businesses will be able to sell craft beers, wines and other alcoholic beverages at the inside location.

The storefront also will serve as a space for some vendors of the Lawrence Farmers' Market to sell their items year-around. Ireland said the store plans to stock some of the honey, jams, jellies and even the locally raised meat.

“We’re trying to make it a small business hub of local artisan food vendors,” Ireland said. “We want that local community feel.”

Ireland said the businesses took possession of the storefront last week and have begun renovations. She said they hope to have the business open sometime in September. But there are still hurdles to meeting that date. The business has created a Kickstarter campaign in hopes of raising $9,000 to help cover the cost of the liquor license and some additional kitchen equipment.

As for the type of food to be served, Ireland said it will be an eclectic mix. Drasko’s is known for down-home comfort food and barbecue dishes. The Purple Carrot is a vegan food truck that does things like avocado smoothies, veggie burgers and other such fare. Wilma’s Real Good Food — which recently was named the best food truck in Kansas City by KC Magazine — makes dishes such as meatball sliders, homemade bratwursts and fried grits. Torched Goodness plans to expand its menu from its dessert theme to include meat pies, such as Shepherd’s Pie and chicken pot pie, plus frittatas and other dishes.

But don’t worry, Torched Goodness also will continue making its creme brûlée, and will continue to have its stand downtown and also at the Saturday farmers' market.

That’s good news because, as I have learned, I need a really wide berth when I’m going around Kasold Curve with a handheld kitchen torch.

Reply 3 comments from Lawrence Freeman Tom Thomson Barb Gordon

Plans call for pair of buildings to be demolished near Ninth and Iowa to make way for high-tech car wash; Zarco owner launches tech product for convenience store industry

They say the best way to make it rain is to wash your car. Given that we already have had a lot of rain, I’m a bit worried about what will happen when a Lawrence businessman starts construction on what he’s calling one of the more advanced car washes in the country.

Look for the project near Ninth and Iowa streets. Plans have been filed at City Hall to demolish the Sandbar sub shop and the gas station/convenience store that is immediately north of the sandwich shop. The two lots will be combined to make way for a large tunnel car wash.

Scott Zaremba, an owner of the Sandbar restaurants and the Zarco convenience store chain, is the man behind the car wash idea. He said the car wash will include new technology unlike any other in the region.

“It will be the next generation of car wash,” Zaremba said. “It will have the coolest stuff, that is for sure.”

But Zaremba wouldn’t provide details. Until further notice I’m going to assume it will have a special thingamajig to get the Crispy Creme frosting off my steering wheel, an advanced whatchamacallit to find the taquito that rolled under the seat last month, and a proprietary doohickey that will allow the F150 to double as a hovercraft.

The project, which is being designed by Lawrence-based Paul Werner Architects, also will include about 25 vacuum stations, and will include a place for a food truck to regularly park. (A man who would sell me a juicy, dripping sandwich right after I’ve cleaned my vehicle is a man who understands the business cycle. If he offered a necktie cleaning service, Bill Gates would be jealous of his genius.)

If you are confused about the location of the proposed project, it is near the southeast corner of Ninth and Iowa. Zaremba owns an American Fuels station that is right at the southeast corner of the intersection. That is the one that includes the Scooters drive-thru coffee location. No changes are planned for that fueling site or the Scooters. Just to the south of that location, Zaremba owns another convenience store/fueling station. It will be torn down as part of the project. Just to the south of that location, Zaremba owns a building that previously was a gas station but since has been converted into a brightly colored Sandbar Sub Shop. It also will be torn down as part of the project.

Zaremba has filed for site plan approval at Lawrence City Hall, but he said it was too early to predict when construction work may begin on the project.

• A car wash isn’t the only project Zaremba has going on. Bill Gates indeed may end up interested in Zaremba at some point because Zaremba has launched a new technology company. Zaremba’s American Fuels stations at Ninth and Iowa and East 23rd Street have new technology at the fueling pumps that Zaremba says is the first of its kind in the country.

The pumps have been retrofitted to include a special touchscreen tablet that allows you to place an order for a sub sandwich that will be made inside the store while you are busy putting gas in your car. The sandwiches, though, are just the beginning, Zaremba said. The touchscreen can be used to sell basically any item in the store. The tablet allows you to pay for the items at the same time you are paying for your fuel, so it adds an extra element of convenience. It also helps the convenience store industry with a problem they have created: Pay-at-the-pump technology has cut down on the number of customers who enter the store.

“There is a huge percentage of customers who don’t come inside the store,” Zaremba said. “This lets us sell almost anything at the pump.”

The bigger potential, though, is that the tablets aren’t items that Zaremba has purchased and added to his pumps. Instead, it is technology that his company has developed. He’s now working to sell the technology to other convenience store chains across the country. He said he has two tests going on in other states.

“They are large chains that potentially could use more than 5,000 screens,” Zaremba said.

Zaremba said he used local programmers and technology developers to create the new tablet application. He said he and partners have been working on the project for about eight years.

In other news and notes from around town:

• We might as well stay in the gasoline world for a moment. Lawrence has a new convenience store brand. The station at 19th and Haskell has become a Valero station, which I think is the first one in Lawrence. The location has added new pumps, and the convenience store portion of the business has been advertising that it is under new management.

I’ll beat someone to the question that frequently comes up when I talk about gas station brands: I don’t have any news on whether Casey’s General Store plans to open a location in Lawrence. More than a year ago, I had reliable sources tell me that Casey’s was close to signing a deal for a location in northwest Lawrence along Sixth Street. But then that deal never materialized. No word on whether the company still has an interest in Lawrence or whether the market is a bit big for the company, which operates in a host of small towns.

Reply 8 comments from Pyewacket Eric Ryan Tim Quest Rick Masters Jake Davis David Carson Richard Andrade Curtis Lange

Pace quickens on Lawrence home sales in first half of 2015; city spending $85,000 for ADA playground upgrades

If you are looking to buy a home in Lawrence, you had better lace up those running shoes. Home sale statistics for the first half of 2015 show that buyers need to be ready to move to keep up with what is becoming a tight home market.

For the first six months of the year, home sales in Lawrence are up nearly 20 percent, compared with the same period a year ago. But an emerging trend in the market is how quickly homes are selling. The days of you and your spouse or roomie having the time to debate whether this room or that room is big enough to house the chocolate fountain are coming to an end. (I’m assuming that is the big debate in your house too.)

The median number of days a home sits on the market before it sells is now down to 25. That’s down from 34 days at this point in 2014 and down from 47 days in 2013. The pace seems to be quickening as well. When you look at just the homes that sold in June, the median time those homes sat on the market before selling was 13 days. Wow. It takes us 14 days just to hear back from the architect on how much it will cost to strengthen the floors of the various closets we’ll use to house shoes. It is a crazy market if people are buying homes before knowing that cost.

In all seriousness, it has been a good year thus far for the Lawrence real estate market. Here’s a look at some statistics from the most recent report from the Lawrence Board of Realtors:

• A total of 627 homes have been sold through June. That’s up almost 20 percent from the same period a year ago. More impressive is the 2015 totals are up about 12 percent compared with the 2013 totals. Last year was a bit of a down year for the local real estate market, but 2013 was a strong year with more than 1,000 homes sold that year. If the market stays on its current pace, it could sell more than 1,100 homes in 2015.

• Sales of newly constructed homes are showing some signs of new momentum. A total of 33 newly constructed homes have sold thus far in 2015. That’s up from 30 during the same period a year ago, but still down from 51 during the period in 2013. More encouraging, though, is that 11 newly constructed homes sold in June. That’s up from four newly constructed home sales in June 2014. The median number of days a new home is sitting on the market before it sells also has improved dramatically. The median now is 76 days, down from 168 days in 2014.

• One of the reasons homes are moving quickly is because the inventory of homes on the market is tight. At the end of June, there were 334 active listings. That’s down more than 25 percent from 2014 levels and down more than 20 percent of 2013 levels. It will be interesting to see if builders see those numbers as being tight enough to start increasing the number of new homes they are constructing each month. Whether that will happen is still an open question. At the end of June, there were 42 newly constructed homes on the market. That’s down from 49 new homes that were on the market in June 2014.

• With a tighter market, selling prices are starting to creep up. The median price of homes sold thus far in 2015 is $165,000. That’s up from $160,000 at the same point in 2014. Whether that is a sign of price pressures in the market or just a difference in the type of houses that are being sold this year compared with last year isn’t clear. But it would stand to reason that overall home values will see some appreciation, if the market remains tight.

In other news and notes from around town:

• Look for some changes at a couple of Lawrence playgrounds. The city is set to spend about $85,000 to put in a rubberized play surface for the playgrounds at the East Lawrence Center and at Watson Park.

It may be the first of several such project that the city’s Parks and Recreation Department undertakes. Changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act in 2012 created new requirements for playground surfaces to make them more accessible to people with disabilities.

The new rubberized surface is expected to be a lot easier for folks who use wheelchairs, walkers and other devices than the current wood-chip surface that exists at most city playgrounds.

“The wood chips have to be really compacted to work well,” said Mark Hecker, the city’s assistant director of parks and recreation.

But figuring out how to pay for a surface upgrade to every city playground may be difficult. The city has 35 playgrounds across the community. Hecker said his initial goal is to try to get six or seven playground surfaces replaced in the next few years. He plans to choose playgrounds in different geographic areas of town to increase the odds that everyone will have relatively easy access to at least one of the newly surfaced playgrounds.

Cost is an issue, though. The city spends about $3,000 to $4,000 to put wood chips in a playground area, and then probably another $1,000 a year to ensure the playgrounds continue to have enough wood chips in place. Based on these most recent prices, the rubberized surface is costing a little more than $40,000 a playground. Hecker expects the rubberized surfaces to last for 15 years or more.

Whether the city will get pressure to become more aggressive to replace the wood chip surfaces with the more ADA-complaint rubberized material is unclear. Thus far, Hecker said the department has been working with local ADA advocates, and they have been understanding that the city will likely have to tackle the issue in phases.

“They just want us to keep moving forward,” Hecker said.

As for the material, it is coming from a Kansas City-based company called Eco Turf. Hecker said the department is still in discussions about the exact product they’ll install. Hecker said the city wants to install some brightly colored material rather than the more traditional brown or black. The city also looked at a product that looked like grass, but Hecker said it was less certain how it would withstand the wear and tear of a playground.

An example of a rubberized playground surface, as shown on the Eco Turf web site.

An example of a rubberized playground surface, as shown on the Eco Turf web site. by Chad Lawhorn

Other parks that may get consideration for upgrades include high-usage playgrounds at South Park, Holcom Park and Centennial Park, Hecker said. Some of those parks also are due for replacement of playground equipment.

“We may find ourselves in a situation where we spend $30,000 on playground equipment and $35,000 on surfacing,” Hecker said. “That’s where it can get a little tricky from a financial standpoint.”

Reply 2 comments from Carol Bowen Steve Jacob

West Lawrence restaurant plans major expansion; details on a Ninth and New Hampshire mishap; Kansas school system gets high ranking

You bet I’ve got a chop house on my mind, and it is not just because I’ve already spent a good part of my week “helping” my 4-H kids wrangle their hogs at the Douglas County Fair. I’ve got news of a large expansion of a west Lawrence restaurant that specializes in steaks and chops.

I briefly mentioned last week that I had heard the Six Mile Chop House and Tavern was expanding at its Sixth and Wakarusa location. Well, now I’ve got details, and they show the expansion will make it one of the larger restaurants in the city.

Brad Ziegler, an owner of Six Mile, told me that he has struck a deal to take all 6,500 square feet of space that previously was occupied by Famous Dave’s BBQ. Six Mile currently occupies space that is adjacent to the former Famous Dave’s location.

Ziegler said a big part of the expansion plan is for Six Mile to get into the banquet business. That means wedding receptions, corporate events, big birthday parties, and bon voyage parties for a certain pair of pigs. (Well, maybe that last one is a tiny niche.)

“We want more room for private events and banquets,” Ziegler said. “We turn down a lot of events because we just don’t have the size.”

That won’t be a problem following the expansion. Six Mile and Famous Dave’s occupied space that originally served as the Lawrence location for the Hereford House. It was frequently said that the Lawrence Hereford House was the largest restaurant in the state of Kansas, just in terms of square footage.

Ziegler said the expansion will allow for a significant increase in general seating for diners as well.

“We don’t know the final number yet, but we’ll definitely double our capacity for dining,” Ziegler said.

Plans also call for an additional bar and lounge area to be added to the restaurant. But Ziegler — who is a longtime bar owner in Lawrence — said he’s not planning on using any of the space to create a large nightclub.

“We’re just talking about a casual place to have a cocktail,” Ziegler said.

What won’t change much is the restaurant’s menu. It will still have a heavy emphasis on steak, with some seafood, pork chops, lamb chops and other meaty entrees. Ziegler said the idea of a local steakhouse has been well-received by Lawrence diners. He said with the larger location he will try to attract a larger customer base by adding a few mid-range cuts of Angus steak in order to offer the option of a lower price point. But plans also call for the restaurant to keep its selection of prime cuts of beef. The restaurant currently offers nine cuts of prime beef ranging from a 17-ounce Bone-In Cowboy Ribeye to the traditional Kansas City Strip. Ziegler said a significant expansion of the restaurant’s wine list also is planned.

Ziegler hopes to have the expansion — which for the moment is focusing just on the main floor space, not the basement of the building — completed in October. But construction work hasn’t yet begun. Ziegler said he’s awaiting the necessary permits from City Hall.

In other news and notes from around town:

• I can guess one group that wasn’t thrilled with this morning’s rain storm: The construction crews that are trying to build the multistory office and apartment building at the northeast corner of Ninth and New Hampshire streets.

Robert Green, president of Lawrence-based First Construction, told me the project is a little more than three weeks behind schedule due to the amount of rain that the area has experienced this summer.

I also wanted to let you know of one other detail about the project, in part, to clear up some potential confusion. I’ve gotten several calls from people concerned that construction crews were dumping unused concrete in the sewer system at the job site. That hasn’t been happening, but there was a significant mishap involving a city sewer line at the job site.

Both First Construction and city officials confirmed that a subcontractor on the job accidentally damaged a city sewer line as part of the site work for the building. As part of the shoring process, a steel pin inadvertently punctured a sewer line. Part of the shoring process included the injection of grout, and the sewer line became filled with grout.

The only way to fix the problem was to replace a large section of the sewer line, Dave Wagner, the city’s director of utilities told me. Both Wagner and Green assured me that the cost to replace the line was paid by the contractor for the building, not by the city. The work to replace the line took place a few weeks ago, and the sewer system is working fine in the area, I’m told by Wagner.

As for the building project, as we previously have reported, it will add about 115 apartments to the downtown scene. Its ground floor will be the new headquarters for Great American Bank, which previously operated in the city as Lawrence Bank. Green said he is hopeful crews will make up for lost time and have the apartments ready to open by the fall of 2016.

• We may not always know where the next check is coming from to fund it, but Kansas’ educational system is one of the better ones in the country — at least according to one new report.

The study is from WalletHub, a financial website that does a lot of data crunching to create “best of" lists. The new study found Kansas has the 12th best “school system” in America. The report primarily looked at K-12, public schools, and examined metrics such as dropout rates, math and reading scores, SAT scores, student-to-teacher ratios and other such measures.

Kansas ranked just ahead of Iowa and just below Virginia. Kansas appeared to excel in a couple of categories in particular. Kansas had the third best pupil-to-teacher ratio in the country, and was tied for fourth in the “safest schools” category. That metric is based off of data that tracks the number of students in the ninth-12th grades who report being threatened or injured with a weapon on school property.

Other rankings for Kansas included:

— 8th for math test scores;

— 10th for dropout rate;

— 10th for average SAT scores.

— 21st for percentage of high school graduates who complete the ACT;

— 25th for bullying incident rates;

— 25th for reading test scores.

In case you are confused, a ranking of 1 is best and 51 (we count both the District of Columbia and Missouri, for some reason) is worst.

Most of the data that WalletHub used to compile the rankings came from the U.S. Census Bureau, or other reputable organizations such as the rankings of U.S. News and World Report, the College Board, and the National Center for Educational Statistics. You can see the complete report here.

And yes, I know you want to know the top 5 and the bottom 5, so, here you go:

  1. Massachusetts

  2. Colorado

  3. New Jersey

  4. Wisconsin

  5. Kentucky

The bottom five:

  1. Lousiana

  2. Arizona

  3. Nevada

  4. District of Columbia

  5. Alaska

As for other neighbors not already mentioned, Nebraska ranked No. 17, Missouri was No. 28, and Oklahoma was No. 33.

Reply 3 comments from Scott  Morgan Rfellows Bailey Perkins

Plans filed to build new retirement community near 23rd and O’Connell in eastern Lawrence

The corner of 23rd and O’Connell may be the latest to try to lure retirees to Lawrence. Plans have been filed to build a 90-unit, independent senior living community near the intersection.

Olathe developer Dave Rhodes has filed a plan to develop about nine acres of vacant ground at 2101 Exchange Court, which is just south of the 23rd and O’Connell intersection and on the west side of O’Connell Drive.

I’ve put a call into Rhodes, but haven’t yet heard back. But the plans filed at City Hall describe the project as independent living retirement community. It will be a sizable one at that. The proposal calls for 15 buildings with six living units per building. Each building will have four two-bedroom units and two one-bedroom units. The development also will include a 2,000-square-foot leasing office.

We’ve previously reported that Rhodes had sought affordable housing tax credits to help finance the project. I haven’t gotten word on whether the project has received those tax credits, but I’m working to get that information. If the credits were received, that would mean that the project would be rent-controlled, and residents would have to meet certain guidelines. Rhodes previously has said the project would be limited to residents 55 years old and over. I’ll let you know when I hear more. He's previously described the project as being about a $16 million investment.

When we reported on the project in November, Rhodes said his development group owned five other affordable “garden/ranch style apartment” developments in Kansas, and also owned or managed about 350 conventional apartment units.

The property already has the necessary zoning in place to allow for the development. City officials now need to approve a site plan for the project to proceed.

It will be an interesting development to watch for a couple of reasons. One is that it continues a trend of Lawrence trying to become more of a destination for retirees. But the other reason is because the new living units could help spur additional commercial development at 23rd and O’Connell.

The southeast corner of 23rd and O’Connell is zoned for commercial uses, but other than a Tractor Supply store, retail development hasn’t yet come to the corner. The general thought on why retail has been slow to develop there is because retailers want to see more homes in close proximity to the intersection. I’m not sure 90 new units will push the area over the top, but there’s also residential zoning just to the south of the retail area, and work to install roads and other infrastructure to accommodate future residential development has occurred on the site.

That’s all for Town Talk today. I know, it was short, but I have an excuse. I have to go weigh pigs. Really, I’m not making that up. It is Douglas County Fair week, and this morning is the day we find out how fat my kids’ 4-H pigs have become. In fact, I’ll probably be near the corner of 23rd and O’Connell to visit the nearby Tractor Supply store. I might be there to buy feed, but it may be too late for that. Perhaps they sell a brick I can put on the scale.

Reply 1 comment from Richard Heckler

Promoter not sure now on canceling 1,000-foot water slide event in west Lawrence; city gets report on its financial health

UPDATE 1:30 p.m.: Maybe there will be bubbles on this 1,000-foot water slide, because the idea of hosting The Urban Slide in a west Lawrence neighborhood quickly is turning into a soap opera.

Ryan Robinson, owner of Lawrence-based Silverback Productions, reached out to me today and said he’s now decided not to cancel the event — at least not yet. He said he’s rescinded his previous request to have the item pulled from tomorrow’s City Commission agenda.

Instead, he wants to have a hearing on his original proposal to temporarily close a portion of George Williams Way south of Sixth Street to accommodate the event. But he’s also put forward an alternative proposal that would close a portion of George Williams way north of Sixth Street to accommodate the event. If neither one of those proposals wins commission support, he said he would cancel the event.

“We want the neighbors to speak up and tell the commission what they want,” Robinson said. “We will be fine with whatever the commission tells us to do. We are in the community-building business. We don’t want to create any problems.”

As for the new proposal to place the slide north of Sixth Street on George Williams Way, Robinson said he thinks the idea has good potential. That section of road is a four-lane street. It leads into the Rock Chalk Park sports complex. Robinson said the western two lanes of the street could be closed, and the eastern two lanes could be open for two-way traffic. Participants could park in the large parking lot at Rock Chalk Park.

Robinson said he had proposed the idea of placing the slide on the southern side of George Williams Way because he thought that would make it more of a neighborhood event that people could walk to or bike to.

Robinson said the whole issue has been frustrating. He said The Urban Slide event is one of the simpler ones his company produces each year. The company specializes in marathons and other races that stretch over broad geographical areas.

The company has hosted several events in Lawrence — it produces The Color Run that brings thousands to downtown Lawrence. He stopped short of saying he would stop producing events in Lawrence, but did acknowledge that producing events in the community has become frustrating.

“The only reason we bring events to Lawrence is because we like to bring cool stuff to town,” Robinson said. “We generate less than 1 percent of our revenue off of the events we do in Lawrence.”

He said the reaction to The Urban Slide event probably will cause the company to re-evaluate what events it wants to host in Lawrence in the future.

“It does sour us some, but we’re a resilient bunch,” Robinson said. “We’re going to continue to call Lawrence home, and we’re going to continue to work out of here.”


If you want a 1,000-foot waterslide in your neighborhood it looks like we are going to have to go back to our original plan of a garden hose and a whole lot of trash bags duct-taped together. That’s right. The idea of The Urban Slide coming to a west Lawrence neighborhood next month appears to be dead.

Last week we told you that Lawrence-based Silverback Productions had filed for a city permit to temporarily set up a 1,000-foot water slide on the portion of George Williams Way between Sixth Street and Harvard Road. But I’ve now received an email from a Silverback official saying that the company is pulling its request for the permit and will cancel the Lawrence event, which was set for Aug. 8-9. Concerns from neighbors apparently did the event in, and Silverback owner Ryan Robinson sounded a bit frustrated about it in a letter he sent to city officials this weekend.

“I think anyone that knows myself and the work that Silverback does within this community knows that we only wish to bring goodness, happiness and prosperity to this city,” Robinson wrote in a letter asking the permit application to be withdrawn from Tuesday’s City Commission agenda. “However, for a variety of reasons we are finding it is harder and harder to do that within Lawrence, and quite frankly the trouble is not worth the gain.”

I had heard late Friday afternoon that City Hall was getting quite a few phone calls from people about the idea of closing down George Williams Way to accommodate the event. Questions about parking and other effects the event may have on the area also were asked.

Robinson said Silverback — which produces The Color Run and other similar large events — said in his letter that his company had a detailed plan for how to run the event. But Robinson indicated that the event was not receiving a warm reception, and specifically cited a letter from neighborhood resident Mike Kelly, who asked city officials a variety of questions about the event’s potential impact on the neighborhood.

Robinson wrote that his company does not do business by “forcing events into unwelcoming communities.”

“We would never do anything in Lawrence to jeopardize our reputation or the good that we have brought this city over the years,” Robinson said. “We will politely bow out into the open arms of one (of) the other 225 welcoming cities that we work with on an annual basis.”

No word yet on what the plan is for folks who have already bought tickets in advance for the event, which had been advertised online for months now. I assume, however, Silverback will provide details about some sort of refund program.

In other news and notes from around town:

• A 1,000-foot slide is one thing. A 10-year long slide is another. City commissioners at their meeting on Tuesday evening will be discussing a decade long slide.

Commissioners will receive an annual report from City Auditor Michael Eglinski, who takes a look at a host of financial indicators for the city. The city fares pretty well in many of the categories measured, but there is one category that serves as a reminder of the major issue facing city leaders: the measurement of job growth and tax base growth in the community.

As part of the report, Eglinski looked at 20 years worth of job growth and tax base growth data. The numbers show it definitely has been a tale of two decades for Lawrence. From 1995 to 2004, growth in nonfarm employment in the Lawrence metro area averaged 2 percent per year. From 2005 to 2014, it has averaged 0.1 percent per year.

Flip the page to assessed valuation — the community’s tax base — and the numbers are even more stark. From 1995 to 2004, the tax base grew by an average of 8.1 percent per year. From 2005 to 2014, the average growth rate dropped to 1.3 percent.

Of course, the decade of 2005 to 2014 included a major recession. But the numbers indicate that wasn’t the only issue at play in the slowdown. These two charts indicate that Lawrence was experiencing a flattening — especially in jobs — before the recession hit in late 2008 or 2009.

Courtesy: City of Lawrence

Courtesy: City of Lawrence by Chad Lawhorn

Courtesy: City of Lawrence

Courtesy: City of Lawrence by Chad Lawhorn

The future is more important than the past on this subject, though. Lawrence has seen some better job numbers of late. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics puts out a monthly report of job totals for metro areas. The most recent data is for May. It shows Lawrence added about 800 jobs from May 2014 to May 2015. That’s an increase of about 1.5 percent, which is quite a bit better than the 0.1 percent average of the last decade. In fact, the 1.5 percent growth rate was the best in the state during that time period. Manhattan was next at 0.7 percent, then Topeka at 0.5 percent, and Wichita saw job losses of 0.4 percent. Kansas City is counted in Missouri, and it came in at 1.6 percent.

It seems like job growth should be a key metric for Lawrence leaders to track. As talk grows about Lawrence and Douglas County creating a new comprehensive plan or vision for the community, it will be interesting to see if leader set a specific goal for how much they want job numbers to grow during the next decade.

The city auditor’s report had several other findings. Here’s a look:

— Lawrence’s debt totals are on the rise, and are at a decade high by at least one measure. The amount of debt per person — adjusted for inflation — is at a 10-year high, Eglinski found. The amount of debt checks in at about $1,100 per person in 2014. That’s up from about $700 per person in 2013. Major projects like the library, Rock Chalk Park, and various street improvements have helped push those totals higher. It is worth noting that until 2014, Lawrence’s per capita debt totals had been on a decline since 2008. But the previous City Commission brought borrowing back in a big way, as the chart below shows.

Courtesy: City of Lawrence

Courtesy: City of Lawrence by Chad Lawhorn

— Governments borrow money to spend it, so it should be no surprise that the amount of city government spending per resident also is at a 10-year high. The inflation-adjusted amount in 2014 checks in at about $1,400 per person, but from about $1,300 per person in 2013. As the chart below indicates, city spending per resident has been on a steady increase since 2011.

Courtesy: City of Lawrence

Courtesy: City of Lawrence by Chad Lawhorn

— Eglinski compares Lawrence’s financial indicators to about 15 “benchmark communities” that include: Iowa City; Norman, Okla.; Bloomington, Ind.; Auburn, Ala.; State College, Pa., and several other college communities. The report found Lawrence was outperforming the benchmark communities in three areas: the city’s financial ability to maintain services; the city’s growth of financial resources; the average age of capital assets such as roads and buildings.

— The report found Lawrence compared less favorably to the benchmark communities in three areas: the city’s liquidity, which measures how quickly the city could have cash to meet immediate needs; the amount of long-term liabilities, such as debt; the amount of the city’s budget devoted to interest payments, which affects the city’s financial flexibility.

— The report also looked at the financial indicators for the city’s utilities department and other divisions of the city that are funded primarily by rates rather than taxes. It found those rate-based divisions — water, sewer and trash service are among the big departments — compared less favorably to benchmark cities in three categories and more favorably in one category. Where the city compared less favorable was in ability to maintain services; financial resource growth; and liquidity to meet immediate needs. The one area where the city compared more favorably is in the rate of aging of capital assets such as utility infrastructure.

You can see the entire report here. Commissioners will discuss it at their 5:45 p.m. meeting on Tuesday at City Hall.

Reply 39 comments from Steve Bradt Zach Davis Eric Boedeker Matt O'Reilly Tom Thomson Dorothyhoytreed Lawrence Freeman Nikki May Carol Bowen Eddie Muñoz and 17 others

1,000-foot waterslide coming to west Lawrence; pair of restaurants win national wine honors; local ADA advocate profiled by Washington Post

Lawrence’s funkiness is spreading. West Lawrence probably won’t be honking for hemp or hosting zombie walks anytime soon, but a plan has been filed for a busy West Lawrence street to temporarily house a 1,000-foot long water slide.

I reported last month that a Lawrence-based company was looking for a spot to set up a massive water slide called The Urban Slide. Well, the company hopes it has found its spot: George Williams Way near Sixth Street.

Normally, this is the type of wild and crazy idea that would find its way into downtown Lawrence. But even downtown has its limits. A 1,000-foot slide would take up most of Massachusetts Street. Plus, there is a little slope to Mass. Street, but not much. So, Lawrence-based Silverback Productions — the company that works with The Color Run and other such events — went looking for a different location. Ryan Robinson, an owner of the company, told me last month he was looking for locations near the KU campus, but that apparently didn’t pan out.

The event is set for Aug. 8-9, and the slide would be set up on the portion of George Williams Way that is south of Sixth Street and north of Harvard Road. I guess they are not going to have the slide go through the roundabout at George Williams and Harvard. That seems like a lost opportunity for the city to do roundabout education . . . you do not have to use your turn signal when entering a roundabout, but you should always yield to a water slider. You know, that sort of common stuff.

In case you are confused, George Williams Way will be closed to traffic during the event. In fact, it will be closed for long periods of time to accommodate the slide. Plans call for the street to close at midnight on Aug. 8 and reopen at 11:59 p.m. on Aug. 9. Organizers have arranged to use the parking lot at nearby Langston Hughes elementary for the event.

City commissioners are scheduled to approve the permit for the project at their 5:45 p.m. meeting on Tuesday. It will be interesting to see what west Lawrence’s reaction is to the event. Thus far, there has only been one letter of opposition filed to closing down the street. I don’t see George Williams Way becoming the next Massachusetts Street and hosting events on a regular basis. This seems like a fairly unique situation. But west Lawrence likely will become more an event venue with Rock Chalk Park. I’m still curious to see what type of events other than youth basketball and volleyball tournaments end up becoming the norm at Rock Chalk. I heard several people liked how the Sertoma BBQ cook-off functioned at the sports complex earlier this year. Whether the complex will become the site for more festival type of events in the future will be interesting to watch.

In other news and notes:

• I don’t know about you, but when I get done going down a 1,000-foot water slide, I find that I’ve worked up a thirst that can only be satisfied by a Buried Cane Cabernet Sauvignon, or perhaps a Bogle Old Vine Zinfandel or maybe even a Pago de Tharsys Brut Cava, which coincidentally is the same phrase I frantically yell while going down The Urban Slide. All those are actually fine wines served at the downtown restaurant Ten (or at least I think they are, although I’m not sure because they rarely let me enter wearing my Speedo.) Ten, which is the restaurant on the ground floor of The Eldridge Hotel, has been named to Wine Spectator’s 2015 Restaurant Awards. Ten was one of two Lawrence restaurants to be included in the prestigious rankings. Five 21, which is in The Oread hotel and operated by the same company that run Ten, also was selected. The rankings are in Wine Spectator’s Aug. 31 edition, which recently hit newsstands.

• Speaking of Lawrence getting some national publicity, a Kansas University professor who fought to win approval of the Americans with Disabilities Act, was profiled in The Washington Post earlier this week. Dot Nary, an assistant research professor at the Research and Training Center on Independent Living at KU, will be in Washington, D.C. to help celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act. While preparing for her trip, Nary sought to make a reservation for a bus tour of Washington, D.C., but the tour operator told her he didn’t have a bus that could accommodate someone in a wheelchair. That’s despite advertisements that said it could accommodate folks in wheelchairs. That was probably not the best strategy on the part of the tour bus operator, but hey, he got his name in The Washington Post. Here’s a link to the article about Nary and her work with the ADA.


A potential danger zone for Lawrence’s public transit system; restaurant expansion at Sixth and Wakarusa

In 2008, it seemed the public transit question in Lawrence was settled. Lawrence residents loved the idea of a city-owned bus system.

Voters went to the polls in November of that year with a do-or-die question. Voters were asked to approve a two-tenths of a percent sales tax to fund the T’s basic operations. Without the sales tax, it was likely that the transit system would be shuttered. Voters made their answer clear. The tax was approved by a 70 percent to 30 percent margin.

Heading into that vote, prognosticators weren’t sure how the public would respond. It could be close, we thought, because there were significant pockets of discontent with the city’s transit system. Instead, the tax measure won every single precinct in Lawrence. It continues to be one of the more lopsided elections I’ve ever covered. It seemed Lawrence had buried the hatchet on the T, or the empTy, as its detractors called it.

Today, questions are back, and the loudest ones are coming from City Hall. They started to get louder on Tuesday night when commissioners balked at the idea of installing a new transit hub near 21st and Iowa streets. Commissioners rejected a proposal to build the hub on the vacant piece of KU Endowment-owned property that is just south of the city’s Fire Station No. 5. They didn’t settle on a different location to build a transit hub, which basically is the place where buses congregate and riders make transfers to other buses on a regular basis. Talk of locations near Ninth and Iowa and perhaps near 19th and Iowa, where KU’s Stouffer Place apartments are in the process of being demolished, were discussed as possibilities.

Now, I want to be clear, I don’t think Lawrence city commissioners are trying to kill the T. But just because they’re not trying to, doesn’t mean that it won’t happen. The big issue facing the transit system is that the very successful sales tax approved by voters in 2008 came with a 10-year sunset. Voters are likely going to be asked to approve a renewal of that sales tax in 2018. If they don’t renew the tax, the T is likely back in jeopardy again.

The transit hub plays a key role in this because transit leaders want to get on with the work of redesigning transit routes to make them more efficient. But they can’t redesign routes until they know where the system’s hub is going to be located. And they say that they can’t get the type of route efficiency they want by having a hub in downtown because the downtown area is too congested to accommodate the number of buses that need to come to a hub.

The 21st and Iowa location has been a favorite of transit leaders because it is centrally located in the city, and to boot, KU Endowment is offering a long-term, no-cost lease for the city to use the land. Plus, it is what is available. The city has tried to swing a deal to put the hub at Ninth and Iowa, behind The Merc, but the property owner isn’t interested.

Commissioners balked at the site for a variety of reasons, but one of the louder critics of the site has been Commissioner Stuart Boley. He’s said the site is a poor one because it doesn’t offer any amenities for riders. In particular, he’s talking about opportunities for riders to get off the bus and spend some money. That would be possible at the Ninth and Iowa site, he notes. Commissioner Matthew Herbert at various times has echoed those comments. Both have said they like the idea of a “destination hub.”

That is an issue that may benefit from some perspective. One issue to understand is the nature of a bus transfer, particularly under the new route system that city transit leaders envision. Under the new system, the average time a rider would be waiting at the hub to make a transfer is about 3 minutes, transit administrator Bob Nugent has told me. So, for someone to decide they are going to want to do some shopping at the transit hub, they are going to have to decide to delay their trip. I’m sure some folks would do that. But if they are willing to delay their trip, they can shop anywhere up and down the route that they happen to be on. For example, your bus goes by Dillons, you have the bus stop near Dillons, you get off and do some shopping, then you catch the next bus when it comes by in about 30 minutes. Dillons doesn’t need to be at the hub for you to do some shopping.

That said, I’m sure there are some benefits to having the shopping convenient to the hub. But, it seems a question worth pondering is, how isolated is 21st and Iowa streets? I decided to do a little test. I did a little walking yesterday in my cowboy boots and black suit to see how far you really are from amenities at 21st and Iowa.

There is a big tree in the center of the site proposed for the transit hub. So I started there and timed how long it took me to get to the shopping center on the northeast corner of 23rd and Iowa streets. It took me three minutes and 30 seconds to get to CiCi’s Pizza. I think that qualifies as a destination. Based on my experiences, I think it is the No. 1 destination in Lawrence for men to get marinara sauce on their ties. Of course, there is quite a bit more to do at that shopping center. There is Cork & Barrel next door to CiCi’s, (you have to get club soda for the marinara stain, so you might as well pick up something to go with it.) There is Hastings next door, which would allow you to shop for books, music or even buy a guitar to serenade fellow bus riders with. There are numerous restaurants at the site. In fact, I think you could even win some sort of national transit award by taking the bus to get to the famed sandwich shop The Yellow Sub. Think about it, you take the bus to get a Tijuana Taxi. (It is a delicious Yellow Sub Sandwich, and yes, I am afraid to ask the origins of its name.)

If you want to walk an extra two minutes, you can get to the CVS on the southeast corner of 23rd and Iowa. And, I know what you are thinking: You would have to be crazy to try to walk across 23rd Street, but the intersection there has made that crossing — at least on 23rd Street — much easier.

So, with an approximately five-minute walk, you have a lot of amenities to choose from. Transit riders are probably some of the best walkers in the city. Is a five minute walk going to discourage them much? I don’t know. It seems a reasonable question though.

I asked Boley about it, and he thinks the site at 21st and Iowa is problematic for a number of reasons. He's thrown out an idea that has a real twist to it. Ninth and Iowa street, but in Centennial Park rather than in the parking lot behind The Merc. That likely would open a whole other can of worms related to whether the city wants to decrease its park space to accommodate lots of buses.

Don’t get me wrong: I’m no transit site expert. And, furthermore, I don’t particularly care whether the hub goes at 21st and Iowa streets. But as someone who has watched City Hall a long time, I sense the transit system entering a danger zone. The biggest risk to the system is that commissioners get bogged down in trying to find a transit site, and the job doesn’t get done before the 2018 election, the transit system isn’t operating the way leaders want it to, and the system suffers at the polls. Another possibility is that a transit hub is chosen late in the game, and the city hasn’t got all the kinks worked out of the new route system before voters go to the polls.

Maybe it won’t matter at all. It is tough to predict how voters will think at any given moment. But this much is clear: The city has been trying to figure out the location for a transit hub for more than two years. That’s a long time. As interim City Manager Diane Stoddard pointed out to commissioners on Tuesday, there is never going to be a perfect site for the hub. And she reminded commissioners that getting a site is really important to the future of the T.

“The site is really key to us being able to provide better service, which I think is one of the things we talked to voters about a number of years ago” Stoddard said.

In other news and notes around town:

• Some of you may have noticed some work underway in the former Famous Dave’s BBQ restaurant at Sixth and Wakarusa. Well, I don’t have all the details, but I have a few. A brand new restaurant is not coming to the space, but rather Six Mile Tavern and Chophouse is expanding. My assumption is the chophouse will only take a portion of the space because Famous Dave’s was huge. Owner Brad Ziegler has confirmed an expansion is underway for Six Mile, but Brad and I have been playing phone tag and I don’t have all the details. When I get them, I’ll pass them along.

Reply 14 comments from Mike Wahweotten Clark Coan Areunorml Paul Beyer Gregdivilbiss Richard Heckler Clara Westphal James MacMurray Jeremy Arthur Carol Bowen and 4 others

Golf course, apartment developments under construction in northwest Lawrence; city commissioner gets graphic on Topeka sewage issue

It looks like Lawrence really is going to get another golf course. I’ve been reporting for years that an Arkansas-based company has filed plans to build a new nine-hole course in northwest Lawrence that will be surrounded by apartments. But now there are actual bulldozers and other equipment clearing the land.

Dirt work also has begun on a new apartment complex and single-family neighborhood a bit east of Rock Chalk Park, and dirt work is underway on a parcel of ground a bit south and east of the sports complex too. In fact. there is so much heavy equipment in that area, it reminds me of the time I decided to get aggressive with the dandelions in my yard. (We learned a valuable lesson there. If you tell me to go chemical-free, you need to be more explicit in your instructions.)

First, the golf course. We began reporting in 2012 about plan by a Fayetteville, Ark.-based Lindsey Management to build a new apartment/golf complex on vacant property between Queens Road and George Williams Way. The property is basically just east of the Rock Chalk Park sports complex. The plans won approval, but the work to build the complex never began. Plans were revised, and the work to build the complex still did not begin. But the Arkansas developers insisted they were still very interested in the project, and were just waiting for the right time to begin.

Now must be the right time because bulldozers are preparing the site, particularly the portion near where Queens Road and Wakarusa Drive intersect. Both a representative with the city and an area developer have confirmed the dirt work is for the golf course project, but I’m still trying to get in touch with a representative from the company.

The company though has filed a final plat at City Hall detailing the development. It still shows the nine holes of golf. Previous plans have described the course as kind of an executive style, which I think technically means it is a bit shorter than a normal course. (I avoided executive courses for a long time because I erroneously assumed they required a staff meeting, a series of memos and a 12-point improvement plan every time I lost a ball.) The primary customer base for the new golf course will be the residents who live on the property. The developers previously have told me that green fees are built into the monthly rent rates of residents. So, you can live at the property and pretty much golf as much as you would like. But the developers also have told me that at their other properties around the country, there usually are tee times available for the general public as well.

As for the apartments, there will be a lot of them. The first phase of the development calls for a mix of one- and two-bedroom units totaling 597 living units spread out amongst 30 buildings. That’s 957 new bedrooms for the area. The second phase will add another 248 living units, or 388 bedrooms. The second phase is on the west edge of the property, pretty close to the Rock Chalk Park complex. The area in between the west end and east end largely will be undeveloped because there are some sensitive environmental features of the property. A public walking trail will be built through the area. The project also includes two clubhouses, two outdoor pools, a tennis court, basketball court, putting green and other amenities. The plans also are showing what looks to be a roundabout on Queens Road, leading into the new street that will be the main entrance for the development.

The developers previously have said they envision the apartments attracting a mix of retirees, young professionals, some students and other people who are looking for a golf-oriented lifestyle.

I’m hoping to hear back from a representative of the development company. I’ll let you know when I hear additional details.

• As I mentioned earlier, dirt work also has begun on an apartment and single-family neighborhood development. We reported all the way back in 2013 that Lawrence builder Tim Stultz had filed plans for a residential development at the northwest corner of Queens Road and Overland Drive.

Stultz told me he hopes to start building foundations and actual buildings on the site in the next several weeks. Construction likely will last through all of 2016 and be ready for residents in the spring of 2017.

Plans call for a mix of one- and two-bedroom apartments that total 172 living units. Stultz said all the apartments will be “garden-style” units. I lost a sizable rental deposit once over confusion about what the phrase “garden-style” apartments meant, so let me be clear. In this case, it means all the apartments will have ground floor entrances opening up to the outside.

“Everybody will be able to walk up to their front door from the outside,” Stultz said. “There won’t be large buildings with long hallways full of doors.”

Stultz said all the buildings will be 8-plexes, and every apartment will come with its own garage. If you are familiar with the Westfield Place apartments near Wakarusa and Eisenhower, this development will be similar to that project. Stultz also owns that development, and he said there is a waiting list for those units. He said there are just a large number of folks who are open to giving apartment living a try, especially if the units have some of the characteristics of a small home.

“There probably will not be any single, undergraduate students who will live in this new development,” Stultz said. “We’re talking about more young professionals, some commuters to Topeka, and probably some retirees. The apartment market has just expanded into so many other demographics.”

The project also will include 83 lots of traditional single-family homes of varying price points, Stultz said. The project also will include a clubhouse, and my understanding is those amenities will be available to both the apartment resident and the single-family home owners as well.

• Those of you who drive Sixth Street also may notice dirt work just north of Sixth Street and George Williams Way, kind of behind St. Margaret’s Episcopal Church. I’m still checking on that site. I don’t think a development plan has been filed for the property, but rather the site is being leveled a bit to make it more suitable for development in the future. It is generally zoned for residential uses.

In other news and notes from around town:

• City commissioners last night said they may send a letter to state and federal environmental regulators regarding releases of sewage into the Kansas River that have come from the city of Topeka’s wastewater treatment plant. There have been two instances of raw sewage going into the river since April, the most recent yesterday. There was a third instance that involved only partially treated wastewater being released into the Kaw due to heavy rains around the plant.

I’m not sure that the commission is going to put Commissioner Matthew Herbert in charge of writing the letter, but it likely would get well read by regulators if he did. Herbert posted some strong comments on his City Commission Facebook page yesterday about the release. He even put them in letter form.

Dear Topeka,
I was elected on April 7th. Today marks my 104th day in office. Today also marks the THIRD time your city has dumped thousands of gallons of sewage into the Kansas River, set on a course for my fine city. It was funny the first time. It made you look incompetent the second. Now, on your third offense, I'm going to start leaving flaming bags of poo on your city steps until you figure out a more permanent solution for your feces disposal.
Lawrence City Commissioner Matthew Herbert

Herbert did preface his comments by noting that normally his wife reads his Facebook posts before he makes them live, in an effort to keep him from sticking his foot in his mouth. But his wife was out of town yesterday.

Reply 4 comments from Kingfisher Michelle Reynolds Bhall87 Tadgh

City betting on hotel stays, liquor sales as part of proposed 2016 budget; commissioners receive report on more than $1.5 million in overtime costs for fire, police departments

Sack out in a Lawrence hotel room, have an extra cocktail every now and then, and tell yourself that you’re doing Lawrence City Hall budget-makers a favor in the process.

City commissioners are close to passing a 2016 budget that makes a bet that hotel stays and liquor consumption both will increase in Lawrence in future years. Commissioners at their meeting tonight will take a key procedural step in approving the 2016 budget. They’ll publish the proposed budget and set a public hearing of Aug. 4, at which point they’re scheduled to approve the budget and the tax rate for the coming year.

So, let’s take a look at how this budget is shaping up:

The Rock Chalk Park project is completed, but it is still having an impact on the city’s budget. The proposed budget calls for taking $150,000 a year out of the city’s guest tax fund to make a portion of the annual debt payment for the city’s $10.5 million recreation center at Rock Chalk Park. Currently, all the recreation center debt is being paid for through the city’s proceeds of the countywide 1 cent sales tax.

But commissioners believe it would be appropriate to pay for some of the debt from the guest tax fund. Guest tax fund revenues come from a special tax that is charged on Lawrence hotel rooms. The city surmises that the eight-gym recreation center helps bring people to town for overnight stays, particularly for youth basketball and volleyball tournaments.

Guest tax money legally can only be used for functions that promote tourism, overnight stays and other activities that will generate more guest tax revenues. The countywide sales tax, on the other hand, can be used for any governmental purpose. So, by shifting $150,000 a year in payments to the guest tax fund, that frees up sales tax money for the city to use for other purposes. It is worth noting that the previous City Commission argued that when voters approved the countywide sales tax in 1994 they were given a “political promise” that the city’s share of the sales tax would be used for recreation projects. That was one of the key arguments from the past City Commission why they felt justified in using the sales tax to fund the recreation center in the first place without putting the issue to a public vote. Whether you subscribe to the political promise theory depends largely on how you remember 1994. Regardless, the city has the legal authority to spend the sales tax revenue on any governmental purpose. It doesn’t have such authority with the guest tax funds.

An issue to keep an eye on, though, is whether hotel stays in Lawrence will increase much over the next several years. The city is betting they will because by adding the $150,000 in debt payments, the guest tax fund is projected to spend more money than it will collect in 2016. The deficit is estimated to be about $40,000. That’s not a major problem in the near term. The guest tax fund has a healthy fund balance, and can afford to operate at a loss for a few years. But, eventually, the fund will need to move into positive territory to remain healthy.

The more significant issue with this change seems to be that residents were told — granted, by the previous commission — that there was no need to vote on the recreation center project because the sales tax funds were being used for what they were intended for by voters. Now, a portion of those funds will be used for other purposes, and the recreation center is beginning to affect other parts of the city budget. At the moment, the impact is fairly minimal because the $150,000 only represents about 10 percent of the annual debt payment the city makes on the recreation center. But we’ll see if this is the beginning of a new trend where the recreation center affects multiple areas of the city’s budget.

City commissioners are making an even bigger bet on liquor taxes. The proposed budget calls for about $350,000 in funding for the WRAP program, which puts mental health/social workers in Lawrence schools. The city is planning to fund that program from the special alcohol fund, which gets its revenues from a special tax charged on drinks served at bars and restaurants. There has been some other shifting of special alcohol dollars to try to accommodate the new WRAP funding, but it is a politically difficult fund to cut expenses in because several social service agencies are funded from the tax revenues. So, the net result is the proposed 2016 budget has the special alcohol fund spending about $52,000 more than it is projected to receive in revenue next year. Unlike the guest tax fund, the special alcohol fund does not have a healthy fund balance. City staff members are estimating the fund will completely spend down all its reserves by the end of 2018. What will change that scenario is if liquor sales increase faster than expected in the coming years. But as we’ve previously reported, for some unknown reason, drink sales at bars and restaurants actually have declined the past two years in Lawrence. Betting on liquor sales to increase in Lawrence, though, generally has been a good long-term strategy.

The proposed budget that commissioners will discuss tonight is different from the recommended budget prepared by interim City Manager Diane Stoddard. The biggest difference is that Stoddard’s recommended budget called for a property tax rate increase of 1.057 mills. City commissioners balked at that increase, however, and the proposed budget now calls for the property tax rate to hold steady.

That means some items had to be cut from the recommended budget to make items balance. (Well, sort of balance. More on that in a moment.) But it also means the city is getting more aggressive in projecting how much revenue it will receive in 2016, at least in one area. The proposed budget calls for $250,000 more in license and fee revenue than what Stoddard’s recommended budget called for less than a month ago. The increase is expected to come from the city’s new rental licensing and inspection program, which gets in full gear in 2016. To be clear, the city is not proposing to increase what it charges landlords; it has just chosen to get more aggressive in its projections on the amount of money the program will raise in 2016.

As for the part about the city’s budget balancing, what is proposed is not a balanced budget. The proposal calls for general fund spending to exceed revenues by about $895,000. But city officials are hopeful that won’t be the case. The city over the last several years has routinely budgeted to spend more than it receives in revenue, yet at the end of the year it has managed to finish with a slight surplus of revenues over expenses. Sometimes revenues — like sales tax collections — increase more than expected. Other times, the city manager’s office put on hold or eliminates certain purchases to keep expenses in line with revenues. The city’s total general fund budget has about $79.7 million in expenses, which is up about about 5.2 percent from 2015.

Among items that are getting a cut in the budget compared with what was in Stoddard’s recommended budget are:

— $25,000 in Planning Department funding that was to be used for various studies;

— $86,000 in the street maintenance division. The money was to be used to buy additional road salt. To be clear, the city will have road salt for the winter season. It just won’t buy as much as once planned.

— A nearly $189,000 reduction in the amount of overtime the Lawrence Police Department pays in 2016. That one caught my eye because a reduction in overtime seemingly would mean a reduction in the number of hours police are out on the street because the city is not adding any full-time officers as part of the 2016 budget. But I checked in with Mayor Jeremy Farmer about the cut, and he said the $189,000 reduction still will allow the Police Department to have at least the same number of hours available for overtime as it does in 2015. Police leaders, though, were asking for an increase in the number of hours they could use in 2016, and commissioners balked at that strategy.


Look for a discussion among commissioners on how the police and fire departments use overtime. Commissioners recently received a new report about just how much overtime is used in those two departments. The fire department spent $609,812 in overtime costs in 2014 for firefighters. Police officials spent $543,651 on overtime for police officers and another $603,938 on overtime for detectives in 2014. As we previously reported, the Police Department has been unable to staff a nighttime detective division, meaning that detectives often are called in for overtime when an investigation needs to occur during the nighttime hours. Police department leaders asked for about $1.2 million in funding to staff a nighttime detective division in 2016, but the funding is not included in the proposed budget.

At some point, I think city commissioners are going to have to figure out what the right size is for the Police Department. What will be interesting is whether they figure that out before they make decisions about what type of police headquarters building to fund. Knowing how large the force will be today and in the future is important in the design of the facility, but the bigger issue probably is figuring out how to spend what could be limited resources. If the city spends $20 million or more to build a police headquarters building, and then determines it needs to spend multiple millions more to add police officers shortly thereafter, will that be politically viable? That’s a big question that could have some big implications for the community and the Police Department.

Commissioners meet at 5:45 p.m. tonight at City Hall.

Reply 1 comment from David Holroyd

Baldwin City firm plans to start offering gigabit Internet service in Lawrence in early 2016; vehicle accident blamed for WOW Internet woes; Wheat State Pizza closes in Lawrence

A company that is installing super fast broadband service in Baldwin City today, says it likely will begin offering the service in Lawrence in early 2016.

Baldwin City-based RG Fiber is close to signing a lease agreement with the city of Lawrence that will give the company access to a ring of city-owned fiber optic cable that is needed to launch a gigabit broadband service in Lawrence.

City commissioners are scheduled to approve the lease agreement as part of their consent agenda on Tuesday evening. Mike Bosch, chief executive of RG Fiber, said that’s one of the last pieces of paperwork needed for his company to start a major broadband project in Lawrence. Bosch has begun accepting preregistrations for gigabit service at rgfiber.com/signup.

If this lease agreement with the city is one of the final pieces needed for the Lawrence project, you may be wondering why work won’t begin until at least 2016. The simple answer is because Bosch is busy making Baldwin City king of the Douglas County digital world. RG Fiber currently is installing fiber in Baldwin City. We have an article in today’s Journal-World about how Baker University will have the super-fast broadband service everywhere from classrooms to dorm rooms. Baker University students are surely destined to rule the world for awhile because they’ll have enough broadband to simultaneously watch YouTube, update on Facebook, post on Twitter and do something called Hulu. (What? I don’t have to shake my hips like that when I say Hulu? You’re sure it doesn’t have something to do with a hula hoop?)

Baker is expected to have the service within the first two weeks of August, and then customers in other parts of the town will be hooked up. After the Baldwin City project is well along, Bosch will start hooking up homes and businesses in Eudora in late 2015. Then, Lawrence will get its chance. That’s right, Lawrence is the largest city in the county, but we’re third on this list. RG Fiber tried to get a lease agreement with the previous Lawrence city commission that would have allowed the Lawrence project to get started quicker, but that deal moved slower than my Miss Pac-man game connected to dial-up.

The new group of city commissioners elected in April restarted those lease talks with RG Fiber. Bosch said he’s now confident the Lawrence project will happen.

“People are genuinely excited about getting this in Lawrence,” Bosch said. “They can see that Baldwin City is a real thing. They know it wasn’t just talk.”

Bosch said the number of signups he receives in Lawrence will play a role in where the company decides to offer the service in the city. He said the most likely locations to be involved in the first phase of the project are neighborhoods near major city streets that already have city-owned fiber in the rights-of-way. Those streets include: Sixth, Clinton Parkway, 23rd Street, Wakarusa and parts of Iowa between Sixth and 23rd streets.

The project will include more than just gigabit Internet service, which is the same speed of service the much ballyhooed Google Fiber project is delivering in parts of Kansas City. In addition to the gigabit service, RG also will offer video cable television packages and phone service, Bosch said. The company is marketing those services in Baldwin City currently. Bosch said he’s still working on a pricing plan for Lawrence, but expects gigabit service to run around $85 to $90 per month. If you want to bundle Internet, television and phone, that service likely would start at about $170 per month.

It will be interesting to watch how this project develops in the coming months. There certainly has been some skepticism among some about whether a startup company like RG can actually deliver a working broadband system. By the time the project gets to Lawrence, there should be some indication of how service levels are in Baldwin City and Eudora.

The last group of city commissioners also got bogged down with the question of whether a company like RG Fiber could make this sort of broadband service available throughout the community. That will be a key issue to follow in the years to come. Will the service make its way into lower income portions of the city? Lawrence-based Wicked Broadband had proposed a different type of system to bring gigabit service to Lawrence. It wanted to create a regulatory system called an “open access” network. An open access network would allow multiple providers to use the same sets of fiber optic cables to get service to people’s homes and businesses. But RG and other companies said creating such a regulation would serve as a major disincentive for other broadband providers to invest in Lawrence. A city-hired consultant largely agreed, so the current crop of city commissioners have moved past that idea and allowed the RG project to move forward.

But if a few years go by and the gigabit service is largely contained to just a few prosperous areas of Lawrence, there may be a discussion about whether the city should offer a city-owned broadband service. That would cost tens of millions of dollars to build. But who knows? Maybe by that time there will be something cooler and hipper than gigabit service that occupies our debates.

In other news and notes from around town:

UPDATE: I heard back from Debra Schmidt, local systems manager for WOW in Lawrence. She confirmed this weekend’s outage indeed was one of the larger ones the Lawrence cable/Internet system has experienced in recent years. She estimated about 4,500 accounts were without service at one point or another on Saturday.

As we previously reported, a vehicle accident on Kasold Drive caused the problems. A car hit a utility box that is a major splice point for WOW’s system in Lawrence.

“It probably was the worst damage we’ve ever had to the system,” Schmidt said.

The accident happened a little after 4:30 a.m. on Saturday. WOW responded to the scene shortly thereafter and had a crew of 10 workers on site until about 8 p.m. Saturday.

“I know it seemed long, but I can promise you we were working very hard to make the outage as short as possible,” Schmidt said.

Schmidt said most customers had service restored before 8 p.m. Saturday, and she said there are no lingering issues left from the accident.

But WOW is experiencing technical difficulties on another front. Schmidt said last week the company installed new equipment related to its On Demand cable television service. She said that installation has created problems for some customers who are ordering On Demand programs or trying to watch On Demand programs.

A timeline for getting that issued resolved hasn’t been determined yet. She said several engineers are working on that issue currently. Schmidt didn’t have an estimate for the number of customers impacted by that technical difficulty, but she said the problem was not system wide.


• While we’re talking about Internet and cable, it was an eventful weekend for the city’s largest broadband provider, WOW. There have been multiple reports on social media of Internet outages and cable problems that occurred this weekend in Lawrence.

WOW’s Facebook page has a special note to Lawrence customers that says a vehicle accident occurred on Kasold north of Sixth Street about 4:30 a.m. Saturday. (The statement said near Kasold and Fourth Street, which caused my GPS to hiccup, so I’m assuming somewhere north of Sixth Street.) “This accident damaged a significant part of our fiber plant,” according to the statement. “Our crews are on site working diligently to restore service as soon as possible.”

Posts on social media, however, indicate there were some problems with video service prior to that accident. I sent an email to the local manager for WOW over the weekend, and she said she was working on an update of the situation. I reached out to here again this morning and will let you know when I hear more.

• We still have sunflower lapel pins and "Wizard of Oz" tattoos, but there is now one less way to show our Kansas pride. Lawrence’s Wheat State Pizza has closed its doors. As I noted on my Twitter feed late Friday (@clawhorn_ljw) the store’s last day of business was on Sunday.

Wheat State was a Kansas creation that used the state’s most famous crop — wheat — to create a unique pizza crust. The store opened about 11 years ago in The Malls Shopping Center at 23rd and Louisiana streets. Brad and Jennifer Remington took over the business in 2010. Brad told me the intense competition in the Lawrence restaurant market caused the couple to look for other opportunities.

“There is obviously a lot of competition,” Brad Remington said. “It is not that anybody pushed us out. But we just aren’t really getting ahead in life doing this.”

Remington said the restaurant business is going through a cycle in Lawrence where more new restaurants are opening than the market can immediately support.

“I know a lot of restaurant people in town who are struggling right now,” Remington said. Remington said the ownership of The Malls had been good to work with, but finding successful restaurant locations in Lawrence is becoming more difficult as the restaurant scene becomes more concentrated.

“Eventually, you have to make that decision to move on,” he said. “Unless you are on Mass. or south Iowa Street, it is really difficult to get seen.”

Remington thanked his customers and said he had “made a lot of friends through this place.” Remington said he suspects there are more changes coming in the Lawrence restaurant scene as some other existing firms re-evaluate their position over the next year.

“I almost think the city has to put some sort of limit on how many new restaurants can open up, but I don’t know how the city could really do that,” Remington said. “But there are a lot of good, small, hometown businesses that are having a hard time competing right now.”

As for the future of Wheat State, founder Ryan Murphy continues to own the rights to the Wheat State name and recipes. Murphy told me in an email that he hopes to reopen a Wheat State Pizza in Lawrence at some point in the future. But it sounded like there were no definite plans. Murphy said he may start a crowd-funding campaign in the next few weeks to try to raise some money to open a new store. He said he likely would focus his efforts on finding a downtown location. I’ll let you know if I hear of any progress on that front.

Reply 6 comments from Josh Masrud Bill McGovern Rick Masters Richard Heckler Crystal Patterson

More details emerge on pending west Lawrence retirement community; city set to tackle bus hub question; major changes to 21st Street possible

Plans for a proposed multimillion dollar senior living complex in West Lawrence are becoming clearer. The developer of the property has confirmed it has entered into a contract for an approximately four-acre site near Sixth and Queens Road.

We reported earlier this week that a Minnesota-based development firm was planning to develop a retirement cooperative that would include 52 living units, underground parking and other such amenities at a west Lawrence site. But at the time, the company — Village Cooperative — wasn’t yet ready to disclose the specific location.

Well, the company has now confirmed it has a contract to purchase a 4.1 acre vacant piece of property that is just south of Sixth Street where Queens Road would be if Queens Road extended south of Sixth Street. The property is the vacant piece on the southwest corner of the intersection, not the rural single-family home that sits on the southeast corner of the intersection.

It you want to get even more technical, the property is just north of where Branchwood Drive ends, which creates interesting questions. When the intersection is fully developed, will we have Queens Road on one side of Sixth Street and Branchwood Drive on the other, kind of like the confusion known as 15th Street and Bob Billings Parkway? Or like Legends Drive and Inverness Drive? Will my GPS explode on my dash? Will pizza delivery drivers simply throw boxes of pepperoni pizza in the ditch because they can’t find their intended address? Maybe there is an upside to this. Regardless, such issues are a ways off. Shane Wright, project manager for the co-op project has estimated construction won’t likely begin until next summer, and that is dependent upon the project pre-selling at least half of its units. He’s optimistic, though.

“Lawrence is a community people love living in,” Wright said. “There is pent-up demand for maintenance-free living options. You can find some, but they probably aren’t this type of ownership structure, and they maybe aren’t age restricted. The options in Lawrence right now are pretty limited.”

The company also has released a rendering of what the Lawrence project is expected to look like.

A rendering of a proposed multimillion dollar senior living complex in West Lawrence.

A rendering of a proposed multimillion dollar senior living complex in West Lawrence.

The development group — which is controlled by Minnesota-based Real Estate Equities Development, LLC — has develop about $235 million worth of residential projects, primarily in the Midwest. The company particularly has focused on senior living and the cooperative style of ownership. It has one development open in Johnson County and two more projects planned for construction in the KC metro area.

As we reported earlier this week, the cooperative style of ownership is a bit different for the Lawrence market. Instead of owning your individual unit, like you would in a condo development, you own a share of the entire housing complex. In the case of the Lawrence project — since it would have 52 living units — each owner would own a 1/52 share of the the entire complex. Wright said an advantage of that ownership structure is that the cooperative is responsible for all the maintenance of the property, even for the items that need fixing inside your unit. For example, if the dishwasher breaks, it will be the responsibility of the cooperative to fix or replace it since technically the cooperative owns it.

It will be interesting to see how the development — which will be limited to residents 62 and older — is received in Lawrence. The city certainly is interested in becoming more of a destination for retirees, and that likely will mean developments will have to be designed in ways far different than how we house thousands of students across town. It will be interesting to watch what the market comes up with.

As for these units, Village Cooperative plans to offer units ranging in size from about 870 feet to about 1,500 square feet. Prices, Wright said, likely will be about $75,000 to $125,000 per share. Residents then will pay a monthly fee of about $900 to $1,500 a month, with that fee covering property taxes, maintenance, some utilities and other such items.

In other news and notes from around town:

• It is getting close to decision time for Lawrence city commissioners when it comes to a major bus issue. Commissioners need to figure out where the city’s main bus hub is going to be. The decision involves a multimillion dollar construction project, and perhaps more importantly, could go a long way in determining whether voters will be ready to extend a sales tax in coming years to continue funding the transit system.

Commissioners will talk about the subject at their Tuesday evening meeting. At issue will be whether the city should move forward with placing the transit hub — basically the place where most of the buses congregate and transfers are made — near 21st and Iowa streets. Commissioners Stuart Boley and Matthew Herbert both have expressed concerns about that location. But commissioners at their weekly meeting will receive a report that says transit leaders still believe that is the best location for the approximately $4 million project.

Boley and Herbert both wanted the city to take a harder look at a site near Ninth and Iowa streets, specifically a site in the parking lot behind The Merc. Transit leaders looked at that site once, and liked it, but then talks broke down with the property owner. The new report says they’ve reached out to the property owner again, but the ownership group stated clearly that it doesn’t have an interest in putting a transit hub at the site.

“The owner states the proposed site for the transit center would not be available because of ongoing leases and plans for future development,” the memo stated.

We’ll keep our eyes open for future development plans near Ninth and Iowa.

Meanwhile, that leaves the site near 21st and Iowa streets as the only one the city has on the table for the transit hub. Technically, the site is at 2021 Stewart Ave., which is just south of Fire Station No. 5 along Iowa Street.

If commissioners move forward with that site, though, they’ll likely have to approve some significant changes to 21st Street. Neighbors are concerned the transit hub will create more cut-through traffic on 21st Street. That’s because the bus hub project would require a traffic signal be installed at 21st and Iowa streets. A traffic signal would make 21st Street a pretty handy way to avoid large parts of 23rd Street.

To combat that, the city is contemplating installing a “traffic diverter” device that would stop motorists from turning off Iowa Street and heading east on 21st Street. The diverter would be placed at the intersection of 21st and Stewart Avenue, which means buses could still turn off Iowa Street and get to the transit hub, but no eastbound traffic would get past Stewart Avenue. Motorists wanting to access the portion of 21st Street east of Stewart Avenue would have to detour over to 19th or 23rd Streets and then cut back to 21st Street.

To be clear, though, 21st Street east of Stewart Avenue would continue to be a two-lane street, and westbound traffic on 21st Street would be able to continue on to Iowa Street. The diverter, though, should eliminate any reason for motorists looking for a shortcut to to turn off of Iowa Street onto 21st Street, said Robert Nugent, the city’s transit administrator.

A couple of other traffic-calming devices are planned for 21st Street as well. Nugent said two to three chicanes would be added to the street. Chicanes are basically a place in the road that becomes narrower for a stretch. The intent is the narrowness of the street slows traffic down. Those chicanes would be built at locations east of Stewart Avenue.

We’ll see what commissioners think of the plans. Boley likely will hear a lot about the subject because he lives in the neighborhood near the proposed transit hub. The hub issue has been on the City Commission’s radar for more than a year. A sense of urgency is building for the project, however. The city’s transit system is funded by a pair of sales taxes that were approved by voters in 2008. Those taxes have a 10-year sunset clause, meaning there will need to be another election in 2018, in order to renew the taxes.

Having the transit hub location in place well ahead of that election is desirable. When the city chooses a new transit hub location — currently it is in downtown, which transit leaders say has become too congested — it will have to make major changes to all of its current routes. Transit leaders want to make sure they have all that ironed out and working smoothly before they ask voters to renew a sales tax to fund the system.

The transit sales taxes in 2008 won by a landslide, so you would think that voters would look favorably on them again. But never assume too much. The state is increasing its sales tax rate, and perhaps voters will see a no vote on a transit sales tax as a chance to give themselves a tax cut. Plus, there are some people who still feel the bus service is not convenient enough. Commissioner Matthew Herbert has expressed that concern several times. If that sentiment starts to take hold in the community, that too will affect a sales tax vote.

We’ll see what commissioners do with all this. At this point, it looks like staff is seeking approval for the 21st and Iowa location, but commissioners could choose to open up another search for sites, or decide to keep the bus hub in downtown, despite concerns about the congestion problems the big buses are facing.

Commissioners meet at 5:45 p.m. Tuesday.

Reply 30 comments from Lawrence Freeman Richard Heckler David Holroyd Carol Bowen Dorothyhoytreed Cindy Bell Kingfisher Matthew Herbert Thomas Bryce Jr. Paul Beyer and 8 others

Builders on pace to obliterate Lawrence’s construction record; city pondering whether to allow digital signs along roadsides

It is frequent that I break something when I get out my hammer and saw for a building project, and it appears that is the case for Lawrence builders this year too. With half of 2015 in the books, it sure appears Lawrence is going to have a record-breaking construction year.

The latest report from City Hall shows that through June, the city has issued building permits for $155.9 million worth of construction projects in Lawrence. Based on the records I have, that’s the highest mid-year mark in the city’s history, and it is not even close. In recent years the previous high was in 2013, when city officials had issued permits for $75.1 million worth of projects through June.

To put it in further perspective, there have only been four years in the history of the city where there have been at least $155 million worth of projects for the entire year. Those were in 2013, 2006, 2000, and 1996.

The record year was 2000 with $175 million worth of projects. That means Lawrence builders need to start $20 million worth of new projects in the second half of the year to equal or break the record. That’s a little more than $3 million a month. When it comes to building, anything can still go wrong. I’ve got a closet without a door that proves that point. (I’m just thankful I was standing on the correct side of the wall when I built it.) But it sure looks like Lawrence is primed for a record.

In terms of the projects that are boosting the totals, there were two decent-sized ones in June. The city issued a permit for $7.5 million worth of construction work on a new sewage pump station for the city’s new sewage treatment plant that is being constructed south of the Wakarusa River. The second-largest project of the month was $6.2 million worth of work that began on the expansion of the Hutton Farms residential complex in northwest Lawrence. As we reported in January, plans were filed to expand the complex, which is just north and west of Peterson Road and Kasold Drive. Plans called the pending development an “exclusive residential community” with a clubhouse and other amenities. The city in June issued permits for 42 duplexes — or 84 living units — and three single-family homes that will be part of the development.

Both those projects are large, but they are still middle of the pack when it comes to other projects in 2015. Here’s a look at the 10 largest:

— HERE @ Kansas apartment and retail building across the street from Memorial Stadium: $45 million.

— Multistory apartment and office building at northeast corner of Ninth and New Hampshire: $18.7 million

— Wakarusa river sewage treatment plant buildings: $13.3 million

— Expansion of Pioneer Ridge retirement community near Harvard and Wakarusa: $12 million

— Pump station for Wakarusa sewage treatment plant: $7.5 million

— Hutton Farms expansion: $6.2 million

— Single-family home at 116 N. Wilderness Way: $2.7 million

— Renovation of the Phi Delta fraternity house near the KU campus: $2.6 million

— An addition onto the Phi Gamma Delta fraternity house near the KU campus: $2 million

— Addition to the Kansas River sewage treatment plant: $1.9 million.

One number that could get lost in all of this is that single-family home construction has picked up as well. The city has issued 138 permits for single-family and duplex construction in Lawrence through June. That’s the best six-month total in at least the last five years. In recent years, the highest total was 87 in 2013. As I reported above, duplexes accounted for a large number of the units in June, but the city still issued 21 permits for single-family homes. That’s the largest single-family showing thus far in 2015. The single-family home market has been an area that has struggled to regain its momentum following the downturn earlier this decade. Watchers of the local economy have been keeping their eyes open for signs of a sustained turnaround in the single-family market. We’ll see what the second half of the year brings in that category.

In other news and notes from around town:

• If there is one project that may be even more dangerous for me than building closets, it would probably be changing the messages on the marquee signs that businesses have around town. You know, those message signs on the tall poles along major streets where they advertise their specials or come up with a funny saying. Think about how dangerous it is: It involves both ladders and spelling.

Well, there’s a pending discussion at City Hall that could remove the ladders from the equation. The city’s planning and development services department is starting a review of Lawrence’s sign code, and one item up for discussion is whether digital message board signs should be allowed. Currently, the only type of business allowed to use digital signs in Lawrence are gas stations, and they can only use them to display the price of fuel. That was a fairly recent change to the city’s sign code.

Leaders in the planning department have said it likely will take six to 12 months for an entire review of the sign code to be completed. There are several other topics officials plan to review when it comes to signs. Those include:

— Changes to how temporary sign permits are issued, which may give businesses greater flexibility in using temporary signs to advertise certain events.

— The use of signs that move, such as pennants, flags, signs on trailers, and something called a “feather sign.” I don’t know what that is, but I’ll keep an eye out for a bird towing a banner.

— Automobile dealership signs. The industry creates some special situations because of their size and desire for high visibility, the department said.

— Better definitions and standards for signs of community interest, which usually are temporary signs that aren’t related to a specific business but usually some type of event such as a home show or the variety of events that happen at the Douglas County Fairgrounds.

— Issues related to the size, number, location and duration of real estate signs that are used to advertise a property is for sale.

— The use of residential commercial service signs, such as the advertising signs roofers and painters use when they are performing a job at someone’s home.

— A review of how the city can address “nuisance signs” that are left vacant and cause blight.

The city expects to conduct the sign code review incrementally, so expect to see some proposed changes for some of these items in the next couple of months.

• It is a beautiful day for a sidewalk sale, and I'll be at one for hours on end. I've packed my jackhammer so I can take the sidewalk home with me today. (Oh wait, I'm told that is not what they mean by a sidewalk sale.) Regardless, I'll still be at the Downtown Lawrence sidewalk sale from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. today at the Journal-World's booth. Stop by, say hi, tell me what's on your mind. Look for the booth at the corner of Eighth and Massachusetts streets.

Reply 3 comments from Richard Heckler Carol Bowen Foodboy