LJWorld.com weblogs Heard on the Hill
New study challenges KU economist's findings on racial disparity in NIH funding
Advertisement
Back in December we told you about how the National Institutes of Health had announced some new diversity-related measures because of a study led by KU economist Donna Ginther that showed black scientists were less likely than their white counterparts to receive grant funding from the NIH.
Now the journal Science, which published Ginther's original article, reports that a study by some other researchers questions some of its conclusions.
This new study shows the "evidence for racial bias is scant" at the NIH, its author told Science, and black and white researchers who've done about the same amount of work tend to receive about the same amount of funding.
This hardly throws Ginther's work out the window, though, as her study did not say the NIH was racially biased. It just said black researchers were receiving fewer grants. That's a different statement entirely.
Her original article wasn't able to pin down a reason for that. But when I talked to her in December, she told me some further work was beginning to suggest there's a lack of racial diversity all the way through the pipeline that produces medical researchers: in graduate-school programs, university faculties and academic journals.
She said it's possible the grant approval process is biased, perhaps because the people reviewing grants are more likely to award them to people they know. But of the new measures announced by the NIH, Ginther was focusing more on mentoring programs for college students and less experienced researchers, which could make the system more diverse from the ground up.
Because of that, Ginther told Science that this new study really just complements her research. She did quibble with some of the researchers' methods, though.
Don't forget to get those KU news tips in to merickson@ljworld.com.
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Legislature makes no progress; Brownback leaves state to tout tax cuts May 20, 2013 · 11 comments
- Letter: Serious issue May 21, 2013 · 1 comment
- Opinion: Amid crisis, Europe resists extremism May 21, 2013 · 1 comment
- Blog: Kansas science and math teachers easily recruited away May 20, 2013 · 9 comments
- Two men arrested in connection with Club Magic shooting May 20, 2013 · 27 comments
- Death toll from Oklahoma City tornado climbs to 91, expected to rise May 20, 2013 · 20 comments
- Opinion: Benghazi triggers a major credibility crisis May 18, 2013 · 66 comments
- Opinion: Scandals undermine trust in Obama May 19, 2013 · 44 comments
- Blog: As Legislature remains deadlocked, Brownback in Chicago touting tax cuts May 20, 2013 · 23 comments
- Gas prices approach record highs May 18, 2013 · 43 comments
- Memphis forward Tarik Black transfers to KU May 20, 2013
- Daytripper: We're in the money May 20, 2013
- For Kansas basketball, recruiting never ceases May 20, 2013
- Two Topeka men shot in Lawrence early Sunday morning; police seeking persons of interest May 19, 2013
- Two men arrested in connection with Club Magic shooting May 20, 2013
- Editorial: Hometown pride May 21, 2013
- Project to build intergenerational retirement community in Lawrence moving ahead April 29, 2013




Comments
Cant_have_it_both_ways 3 months, 2 weeks ago
Looks like a good lesson in keeping your nose in your own business. Another black eye for KU.
merickson 3 months, 2 weeks ago
Well, you can't really say that Ginther was sticking her nose in someone else's business: the NIH commissioned her to lead the study. She didn't just do it on her own.
See our story from December:
Thanks,
Matt
gudpoynt 3 months, 2 weeks ago
Discrediting good science without any evidence is just as unscrupulous as presenting bad science as good.
Why do you bother claiming her report is bad science when it's pretty clear you have no idea what you are talking about.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.