LJWorld.com weblogs Common cents
A house for no money down
Yes, you can still buy a house for no money down. At least some people can.
Sound like a middle-of-the-night infomercial? It’s not.
At least two mortgage loan programs have money to loan without down payments. One is through the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Development program. The other is through the federal Department of Veterans Affairs.
Not everybody can get those loans. Income guidelines must be met, and the VA loans are for military veterans. The RD loans also are designed for people buying in a rural area, including towns of no more than 20,000 people.
Since the national downturn in the mortgage lending business began two years ago, interest in RD loans have steadily increased in Kansas. In 2005 there were $40.2 million in home loans in the state, according to the Kansas RD office in Manhattan. By 2008 that had increased to $118.5 million. Last year 1,444 loans were made.
“These are not subprime loans,” RD housing program director Tim Rogers said. “Our programs never did get into that.”
RD makes the money available to local lenders. There is no loan limit, but the amounts are determined by an income formula. Interest rates are negotiated between the borrower and the loaning entity. Most recently they were roughly about 5.5 percent on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, Rogers said. The money comes from RD at no risk to the local lending institution.
“We fully expect the lender to give the borrower a discounted interest rate because we've taken the risk away," Rogers said.
In Douglas County last year only six RD loans were made. That isn’t necessarily surprising because most county residents live in Lawrence, a town of about 90,000 people, Rogers said.
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- On the street: How did you spend your Memorial Day? May 28, 2012 · 37 comments
- District Attorney Charles Branson to run for third term May 29, 2012 · 13 comments
- National group seeks repeal of 'Stand Your Ground' law in Kansas May 27, 2012 · 165 comments
- Information gap May 29, 2012 · 2 comments
- Experts: Remedial college classes need fixing May 28, 2012 · 19 comments
- Kansas tax act most regressive in nation May 27, 2012 · 275 comments
- Poll: Have you ever considered running for public office? May 29, 2012 · 1 comment
- U.S. military sees new appreciation May 28, 2012 · 46 comments
- Blog: Iranian Nuclear Energy: Will It Destroy Lives Or Save Them? May 29, 2012 · 4 comments
- Tax gamble May 26, 2012 · 94 comments
- Kansas tax act most regressive in nation May 27, 2012
- Thread of pain ran through Jackson’s career June 28, 2009
- Friends mourn Lynn Bretz, former voice of KU May 28, 2012
- Hilltop executive director Pat Pisani stepping down May 28, 2012
- Town Talk: UPDATE: Frank Male files for county commission; keep an ear open for local sales tax talk; city hires new city engineer; wholesale water district buys land near Kaw; weekly land transfers May 29, 2012
- How to help: Guides needed for Lamplight Tour of Black Jack Battlefield and Nature Park May 27, 2012
- Library kicks off reading program May 27, 2012
- City, county mull upgrade to emergency radio system May 28, 2012
- Town Talk: UPDATE: Thellman files for re-election to county commission; News of salvage yards, curbside recycling and a pig May 25, 2012
- Fraternal reorder: Clubs, lodges face dwindling membership in modern world January 10, 2010



Comments
LJWorld.com doesn’t necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.
Godot (anonymous) says…
These "no skin in the game" loans are happening right now in Lawrence. I just saw a transaction go through where the sale price was listed as "x", but the seller paid all closing costs, and the buyer was able to borrow 100% of the so-called sales price. Buyer was able to get a mortgage with zero dollars out of pocket; the county will book the sale at the full sales price while not discounting the amount the seller paid in closing costs. The seller half-way loses (but is eternally grateful to be out from under the burden of owning property in Douglas County), the buyer wins, big time, and the county wins because the sale price was falsely inflated, thus justifying higher property taxes.
In the end, the real loser is the taxpayer, because the loan is guaranteed by the US taxpyer(i.e. sucker) and, because the buyer has no "skin in the game," he/she can walk away if the value of the house drops, leaving you/me, the taxpayer to pick up the tab.
Obamanomics is a wondrously insane phemomenon to behold.