Advertisement

Previous   Next

How much do you think the city should fine people who don’t clear their sidewalks?

Asked at Target, 3201 Iowa St. on February 5, 2011

Browse the archives

Photo of Jenn Fortune

“It depends on where you live. $73 is too much.”

Photo of Bart Nash

“I’m an avid shoveler so I’ll get over and help my neighbors. I think $30 is enough to get you angry and make you want to shovel it.”

Photo of Morgan Pemberton

“It depends on if it’s a high-traffic area, then they should be more on top of it.”

Photo of Nathan Lipski

“I think probably 50 bucks.”

Comments

autie 3 years, 8 months ago

I think zero would be good. Governement cannot legislate nature. On the other hand, the city should pay a $25 stipend to anybody that does shovel their sidewalk. Many municipalities have joint maintenance ordinances for sidewalks...bus up big brother.

oh...and if I'm not mistaken...first. (please insert any comment I may have made to get this post disappearededededed) thank you.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Take their house - it is a capital offense - in Lawrence - the seat of all civic virtue

0

gogoplata 3 years, 8 months ago

I am amazed the sheep in Lawrence allow the city government to fine them if they don't shovel the sidewalk when it snows. You people need to grow some backbone.

0

Kam_Fong_as_Chin_Ho 3 years, 8 months ago

Most people do it because it's considerate of pedestrians. Look at Bart Nash above. He seems like a good neighbor rather than a sheep who shovels because "the man" tells him he must. Frankly, I'm amazed at the number of people who are too lazy to get off the couch and shovel their walks.

0

Kam_Fong_as_Chin_Ho 3 years, 8 months ago

Here's a better question: How is the old guy or somebody with MS expected to safely navigate your unshoveled walk? It's difficult enough for them as it is. Maybe you should step up to the plate and shovel it so that people with physical limitations are at less risk of falling.

0

livinginlawrence 3 years, 8 months ago

Well said. And even aside from these sorts of folks, what about the people in town whose feet are their sole source of transportation? When people fail to even partially clear their walkways (I don't expect perfection), a stroll down the street becomes a test of agility at best, and downright dangerous at worst.

Presumably, at least a decent chunk of those who cry foul at having to shovel their walks only do so because they are able to use a car to get about. To these individuals, how would you feel if the city workers did nothing at all to clear the roads?

0

jenniflip 3 years, 8 months ago

Exactly. I have a neighbor who is blind with a seeing eye dog. She not only likes to walk downtown to get coffee, but she walks to our neighborhood school to pick up her kids. Yet, the neighbor at the end of the block never shovels the sidewalk. Her driveway is shoveled, why couldn't an extra 20 + minutes have been spent shoveling the sidewalk? I shovel my sidewalk. Why should I have to shovel for people who are to lazy or stubborn to shovel theirs?

0

sr80 3 years, 8 months ago

what?? did all the disabled people suddenly decide it was a good day for a stroll around the block.seems to me they will have a problem whether the walk is clear or not.

0

Kyle Reed 3 years, 8 months ago

Why would they have a problem if the walk was cleared?

0

Mike Willoughby 3 years, 8 months ago

Look, sidewalks are an important part of a city's infrastructure. Just like the streets that move vehicles around the sidewalks need to be maintained to move pedestrians around. It's about flow, and eventually about commerce. This whole legislating nature argument is ridiculous. In the summer absent snow, ice or even rain, if your sidewalk has deteriorated due to "nature" and someone trips on an uneven part, or turns an ankle on an upturned brick, you're gonna have to pay for it. This is about maintaining your property and the parts of your property that are designated by the city (long before you purchased it) as a public use right-of-way. Man up! If you're old, have MS, or are just lazy then pay some high school kids in your neighborhood $20 to clear your sidewalks. Or you can pay the city $50.

0

fanofKU 3 years, 8 months ago

I guess my question is, who's sidewalk is it anyway? If you want to remove the sidewalk and plant grass, the city will claim it's their sidewalk. So why should the homeowner have to clean the sidewalk if it belongs to the city? Can someone answer this question?

0

SnakeFist 3 years, 8 months ago

An easement is a right of use - an exception to what would otherwise be trespass - its not a structure and it can't create obligations to maintain a structure for the benefit of someone else.

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

The easement is on your property. You are required to maintain the easement under the right of use agreement so that the entity that has the right of use can actually use it.

0

trymeone35 3 years, 8 months ago

I agree100% you put it there you clean........city of Lawrence needs to clean there own side walks.. I see a lot of handicap ramps buried in snow pills... where do we send your ticket too??? clean out your own closet Lawrence...i have lived here 41 years and all i have to say is wow !!! shame on you Lawrence...

0

Kent Fisher 3 years, 8 months ago

The fine should be greater than the cost of hiring someone to do it. Currently, it is often cheaper for the property owner to just pay the fine rather than hiring someone.

0

friendlyjhawk 3 years, 8 months ago

Even tho I can't shovel my sidewalk and pay to have it done, my question is what can be done about the mess the maintainer, snowplow, whatever makes all over MY freshly shoveled walk and the entrance into MY driveway as they are cleaning the street in front of my house? There was 3 ft of snow blocking my drive and sidewalk after the city worker made his mad dash down my street. Also my neighbor's. We are both old ladies and had that to contend with. If my hands weren't for crippled from RA I would have flipped off the guy cleaning my street.

0

dani36921 3 years, 8 months ago

I am so sorry to hear that. Next time we will tell the snow plower guy to get out of his truck after working 2-3 days straight and shovel the end of everyone's driveway!! Because that is sooooo inconsiderate of him.

If you can invent a way for the snow plowers to plow streets to your standards of not piling snow at the end of the driveway and STILL do it in a timely manner, please share.

People, this is a community. Has anyone ever heard of taking one for the team? This snow doesn't happen everyday. There is no perfect way of handling any of this. Grow up. Deal with it. Move on. Spring is in a month already. I understand a lot of you having to get your daily complaining session out, but seriously? This is getting sooooo old.

0

Rae Hudspeth 3 years, 8 months ago

I need a "like" button for this.

0

Salvia 3 years, 8 months ago

Actually, a good plow operator can direct the snow by controlling the blade.
At the break neck speed these plows go down the street, it probably isn't possible. How about doing a good job instead of just getting it done? There have been many complaints. We had over 18 inches of ice/snow mix at the end of our driveway after we had already shoveled it. We couldn't get back into our driveway. Maybe drivers need a little more training, but city seems to handle this problem by blaming those who complain. Quit making excuses and do a little problem solving.

0

sr80 3 years, 8 months ago

you could go out and buy yourself a little lawnmower with a plow attachment for around $750 new or $400 used and give that plow operator a taste of his own medicine.go gettem dani !!!!!

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

I am not sure why the outrage about this. Snow shoveling ordinances are common. Many cities have them. Several have much less time to clear it before penalty.

Trenton, NJ - 12 hours of snow stopping & $50 fine. Also their ordinance applies to ice & dirt. http://www.thenewsherald.com/articles/2011/02/05/news/doc4d4c76d8d9677119823134.txt

Arlington, VA - 24 hours of snow stopping & $50 fine for less than 200ft & $100 ft of more than 200 ft. Also a fine of $250 applies if the property owner shovels the snow/or ice into the street, transit stop or sidewalk. http://www.arlingtonva.us/departments/Communications/PressReleases/page77111.aspx

St. Paul, MN - 24 hours of snow stopping & $100 fine. Additionally, you can report violations on their website. And you get a handy dandy doorhanger to put on your neighbors' doors to remind them! http://www.stpaul.gov/index.aspx?NID=918

Topeka, KS - 12 hours of snow stopping & up to a $499 fine or 179 days in jail. http://cjonline.com/news/local/2011-01-26/sidewalk-snow-removal-policies-questioned

There are many more if you google snow shoveling ordinances. Lawrence's ordinance is a fairly lenient one.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Katara. How about comparison to cities like Lawrence where only 25% have sidxewalks?? Everyone above (except Topeka) dwarf us. Smaller towns tend to have more important things to do than legislate snow removal.

My solution is to draft all able body persons in Lawrence 15 to 60 and assign them a stretch of sidewalk to clear. That would be fair. Probably would reduce the ranting a great deal.

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

http://tinyurl.com/yfnb36q

Towns with much smaller populations than Lawrence, KS disagree with you as to the importance of snow removal.

If you'd like to know more about snow removal ordinances in towns with a population less than 100,000, feel free to google "snow removal ordinances of cities 100,000 or less".

http://tinyurl.com/rajut9

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Katara

There are thousands of small and medium size towns that have ordinances and thousands that do not - should we list them all??. The real issue is enforcement. I know Arlington - Strict rules relatively unenforced. County did the inspections (did not have a "rat" line for snow). Egregious violations were enforced. Most residences did what they did. I might also observe that Arlington has different demographics than Lawrence. A lot more people have sidewalks. But snow rarely stayed long and few people were messed with. Guess they just get along better back there.

What is somewhat unique about our ordinance is that it is based on the "rat" line - neighbor against neighbor. It also has no flexibility. A guess it makes people like you feel better.

I note that all you want to discuss is the ordinance itself. How about the responsibilities of the 75% of us who have no sidewalks. Around 55 people have signed up to help old and infirmed property owners. The rest call mommy. Shows real civic focus. You also avoid the difference between resident property owners and commercial interests, where the latter may in fact be your real problem.

Nice of you to avoid the positive comment about snow removal out here where it has not changed despite your new rule. We seem to get along. What is the matter with you people wherever you are?? Are there not some real problems in your life?

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

The article is about the ordinance itself and what the penalty should be if violated. I pointed out that this type of ordinance is very common in the U.S. I am sorry that you fail to understand that many towns of all sizes consider snow removal an important function.

I question your figure. More than 25% of Lawrence has sidewalks. Show your work, please.

I haven't stated any position one way or another on the ordinance. Typical of you to attempt to put words in another's mouth when you don't like the answer.

There is no new rule. It is the same ordinance. What is required of property owners is the same. The penalty for violating it changed. I do not understand why you do not get this.

0

Scott Morgan 3 years, 8 months ago

Aleepo Syria-18 hours after snow stoppage infidels up to 35, 000 euro fine and stoning.

0

SnakeFist 3 years, 8 months ago

Please, don't give the busybodies any ideas.

0

kernal 3 years, 8 months ago

I was out and about Downtown, Old West Lawrence, Iowa Street and out to Hy-vee in West Lawrence and I saw a lot of sidewalks shoveled and a lot of them blocked at the intersections by mounds of snow. i don't know when the city plowed Iowa, 9th St and 6th St, but someone needs to dig out those sidewalks where people cross. What's the good of a cleared sidewalk if someone is going to fall from having to climb over the stupid one foot mound of snow and ice to get across the street? Good luck to those in wheelchairs!

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Well, as is so often the case on here we make it absolute. People unable to shovel should not have to shovel. If that causes someone with a challenge a problem the rest of us should step up and addresses the issue. There are way to many renters ranting about owners not shoveling while they, usually younger and in better shape, use their fingers to call mommy - the city - to complain. Where are their civic values???

Yes, most of us shovel your walks because the kids among others use them - not because the city has a law. I suspect the law has done little to actually change anything as many of the landlords and management companies eat the fine (probably writing it off as a cost of doing business) while the resident owners shovel anyway. In my neighborhood the walks were mostly cleared by Thursday evening - consistent with what happened before the new ordinance. Where people were unable to do the job others helped. Entrepreneurs were about clearing walks for very reasonable rates (good citizen rates).

If this is the "biggy" here in Lawrence we need to do some soul searching!!!

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

It is not a new ordinance. It simply was given more teeth for enforcement. Same law. Bigger fine.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

That makes it a new law in my books. The old one had fexibility. The new one has none.

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

The requirements of the ordinance are still the same. Increasing the penalty for violating an existing ordinance does not make it a new law. Lack of teeth for enforcement does not make anything flexible.

If anything, one could argue that the Lawrence ordinance is much more lenient than other towns. We get 48 hours after the snow stops. Many only get 12-24 hours.

Anyhow, half the time the snow has already melted here before any enforcement of the ordinance begins. We normally do not get a lot of snow and this usually does not become an issue more than a couple times a year. You make an awful fuss about something that does not happen often.

0

Bill Lee 3 years, 8 months ago

I live on W. 8th Street, and there are sidewalks that haven't been shoveled once this year. Should there be cumulative fines for something like this?

0

swampyankee 3 years, 8 months ago

Can I charge the city to shovel my street ?The parking areas at Lyons park are plowed before my street is.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

That depends on how much sidewalk you have. Soem have twenty feet and some have 200 feet. The latter is a bit nore of a chore.

0

Scott Morgan 3 years, 8 months ago

Only 10 minutes, oh I see said the blind man. Some folks wish they could but cannot shovel at all, 10 seconds or 10 hours. The last time I posted this information a rude person offered to call the volunteer shovel crew.

Tip o hat, but 3000 requests and 55 shovelers.

0

Mari Aubuchon 3 years, 8 months ago

Ten minutes? Not if you have a corner lot with brick sidewalks (snow blowers do NOT do the job)! It is a two hour job for us.

We really don't mind shoveling and did so prior to the ordinance but we would really like to see the courtesy returned. Most of our sidewalk traffic is composed of dog walkers and it would be great to not have to scoop their poop before mowing in the spring, summer, and fall.

Just a thought.

0

irvan moore 3 years, 8 months ago

i don't mind shoveling my sidewalks but i wish they would have snow emergency routes and get the cars off Kentucky and Tennessee so we wouldn't have cars sticking out 4 feet into the street.

0

DillonBarnes 3 years, 8 months ago

I was thinking about that yesterday when I was on Tennessee, but that's A LOT of cars. Where would they go?

0

Richard Heckler 3 years, 8 months ago

"What's the good of a cleared sidewalk if someone is going to fall from having to climb over the stupid one foot mound of snow and ice to get across the street? "

Good point.

Yes an older gentleman did fall trying to get through a pile at 6th and Maine on Saturday. Lucky for him a woman jumped from her vehicle to assist as did a Douglas County sheriff who just happened by. The gentleman went down on his stomach.

The city will need to send out a crew of Bobcats and shovels to follow behind the snow plows.

Who is responsible for long stretches of sidewalks on Wakarusa and Haskell? These are both busy sidewalks and exercise routes. Many JCCC students use the Haskell sidewalks to catch the K-10 connector bus.

0

Ksgirl2000 3 years, 8 months ago

I I live on the corner of a double cul-de-sac and the sidewalk ends with my property. And although I was grateful for the city in clearing my streets thursday morning with a bobcat, they dumped it all on my sidewalk (more than 6feet high) as they didn't find the sidewalk important enough as they could have dumped on the opposing corner without a sidewalk. So why should I find it important to go shovel this? Even though I'm sure someone with nothing better to do with their day will call me in even though there aren't anymore side walks to use past mine on a dead end road. I would prefer they fine my neighbors EVERY Saturday night from spring through fall for noise levels (note this is not fun party noise but rather trashy fights over who gets the next "hit" off the "pipe" and who hit who) through 5am in the morning. But no... no noise level ordinance fine. Or what about the unleashed dog law. No hype on that ever... Gotta love Lawrence and their love for pit bulls and lack of leashes. All these other issues should carry a enforced fine. So when the city takes other problems seriously, I will shovel my unused 6ft high snow bank of a sidewalk, seriously.

0

DillonBarnes 3 years, 8 months ago

Clear the sidewalk, just do it up to about a foot from the ground. hehe

0

snoozey 3 years, 8 months ago

Perhaps public service such as Link kitchen duty would be appropriate in return for city workers clearing their walks. That seems a reasonable trade of service for the infirm.

0

Alceste 3 years, 8 months ago

Be nice if the people sentenced to Community Service for things like DUI, traffic tickets, and any other misdemeanor or even felony matters were sent out with shovels to do this work.

What is preventing our community from accessing this, essentially, free labor pool???

The answer is the idiots at Court Services who will find every excuse in the book (the most often used one being "We don't have the insurance" which really translates into "We're too lazy to leave our offices and actually be a part of the community"...) to NOT be progressive in their thinking. "We've always done it this way....". Give a ring to Ron Stegall, Chief Executive Probation Officer (how ya like that FANCY title?!!) at (785) 832-5220 or email him at rstegall@douglas-county.com . He'll be glad to explain to you why that office CANNOT serve the community. His antiquated decision making is backed by Linda Koester-Vogelsang, Court Administrator: (785) 832-5256; lkv@douglas-county.com (They have a SET list of places where Community Service hours can be worked off and they're all in a/c and heated sit down places; Nice and comfy for that oh so misunderstood drunk driver or whatever.....).

Community corrections and community service: Jokes in Douglas County, Kansas

0

del888 3 years, 8 months ago

There should be a website where people can sign up to shovel the sidewalks in their neighborhood, and also put the price they would charge. Then the people living in that neighborhood can select from a list of people to come to their house and shovel the snow. This would also work for lawn mowing, gutter cleaning, etc etc. Maybe I'll go do that now.

0

Alceste 3 years, 8 months ago

There are a ton of people seeking snow removal work on Craig's List

Be nice if the people sentenced to Community Service for things like DUI, traffic tickets, and any other misdemeanor or even felony matters were sent out with shovels to do this work.

What is preventing our community from accessing this, essentially, free labor pool???

The answer is the idiots at Court Services who will find every excuse in the book (the most often used one being "We don't have the insurance" which really translates into "We're too lazy to leave our offices and actually be a part of the community"...) to NOT be progressive in their thinking. "We've always done it this way....". Give a ring to Ron Stegall, Chief Executive Probation Officer (how ya like that FANCY title?!!) at (785) 832-5220 or email him at rstegall@douglas-county.com . He'll be glad to explain to you why that office CANNOT serve the community. His antiquated decision making is backed by Linda Koester-Vogelsang, Court Administrator: (785) 832-5256; lkv@douglas-county.com (They have a SET list of places where Community Service hours can be worked off and they're all in a/c and heated sit down places; Nice and comfy for that oh so misunderstood drunk driver or whatever.....).

Community corrections and community service: Jokes in Douglas County, Kansas

0

Matt Needham 3 years, 8 months ago

I feel sorry for the mail carriers. How about no mail delivered if you don't clear your sidewalk?

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Aha. Did you realize that in many portions of our fine metropolis the mail carrier drives a truck to a community box somewhere down the street from your home?? The city leaves big snow piles in front of the mail carriers entry so that they have to try to maneuver their little truck through the drifts to get their job done. It deserves mention that they do get it done! More unsung heros as compared to people on here demanding that someone else do it because they say so!!

0

Matt Needham 3 years, 8 months ago

It's not like the cops are driving around looking at sidewalks. Someone has to complain before a fine is issued. Who do you think is complaining about your un-shoveled sidewalk? It's probably either your neighbors, or the guy who wants you to pay him $20 to shovel it.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Katara (anonymous) replies… The requirements of the ordinance are still the same. Increasing the penalty for violating an existing ordinance does not make it a new law.

It sure does IMHO if the old ordinance had no teeth

If anything, one could argue that the Lawrence ordinance is much more lenient than other towns. We get 48 hours after the snow stops. Many only get 12-24 hours. True in some cases not true in otheres. Enforcement is the key. WE are many do not.

Anyhow, half the time the snow has already melted here before any enforcement of the ordinance begins. We normally do not get a lot of snow and this usually does not become an issue more than a couple times a year. You make an awful fuss about something that does not happen often.

Well I might point out the reverse. Your sure make an issue out of a problem that exists (if at all) for only a short time every year. Just walk on the snow for a day or two and it will be gone!!

0

Katara 3 years, 8 months ago

You keep assigning me a position that I have not taken, George. I've not said one way or the other what I think of the ordinance other than I do not understand why it is an issue since 1) It is not a new ordinance and; 2) snow removal ordinances are common across the U.S.

I'll not feed your ego anymore. It has been so long that I have responded or read anything you say that I forgot you are so dishonest with your postings and what people actually say.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Sorry Katara I feel the same about you.

The ordinance did change (stronger enforcement and shorter time) and there are many places that have a much less restrictive ordinance if any at all. More importantly, many of the more restrictive ones are not enforced.

It is a big deal because I do not want my government making a small portion of the community do something that the vast majority is not required to do. Simply equity! Since when did property owners with a sidewalk become slaves to the rest of you?

Your failure to address my challenges to your simplistic argument reflects your position as clearly as if you issued a formal endorsement.

0

Alceste 3 years, 8 months ago

Moderate: George Lippencott: Please weigh in:

Be nice if the people sentenced to Community Service for things like DUI, traffic tickets, and any other misdemeanor or even felony matters were sent out with shovels to do this work.

What is preventing our community from accessing this, essentially, free labor pool???

The answer is the idiots at Court Services who will find every excuse in the book (the most often used one being "We don't have the insurance" which really translates into "We're too lazy to leave our offices and actually be a part of the community"...) to NOT be progressive in their thinking. "We've always done it this way....". Give a ring to Ron Stegall, Chief Executive Probation Officer (how ya like that FANCY title?!!) at (785) 832-5220 or email him at rstegall@douglas-county.com . He'll be glad to explain to you why that office CANNOT serve the community. His antiquated decision making is backed by Linda Koester-Vogelsang, Court Administrator: (785) 832-5256; lkv@douglas-county.com (They have a SET list of places where Community Service hours can be worked off and they're all in a/c and heated sit down places; Nice and comfy for that oh so misunderstood drunk driver or whatever.....).

Community corrections and community service: Jokes in Douglas County, Kansas

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

Great idea but my challenge is more fundemental. If the governemnt wants its walks cleared it should pay somebody to do it not demand that 25% of the populace accept the burden. Tax everybody. Give a rebate to property owners who do it themselves or pay to have it done. Contract for the rest. Tax should be separate from the property tax since everybody uses the walks. Maybe a flat fee attached to the utility bill for everybody. Allowing governemnt to solve a problem on the backs of a minority open the door to even greater abuse.

0

Alceste 3 years, 8 months ago

Stay on target here, Colonel: We, as a community, have a currently available resource to, at the very least, shovel the snow for the elderly and disabled.

We, as a community, need to mandate that Court office to get off their collective duffs and get it done.

Your ideas are pie in the sky....they involve real change. You'll be 6 feet under before anything like what you wrote above is even considered.

0

George Lippencott 3 years, 8 months ago

of course you are right.

The problem with your idea is that it, like mine, costs money and the city (or county) does not want to pay the bill. It is so much easier to make someone else do it for free.

0

Jeremiah Jefferson 3 years, 8 months ago

Its very concerning to me that the city has the time and money to go around busting peoples chops for not shoveling a sidewalk. I would think there were more important issues at stake than a side walk that isn't shoveled and will most likely melt off in a few days anyway. Far as I am concerned, people shouldn't be walking in this kind of weather in the first place. For those who must walk or choose to walk, grow a set of balls and suck it up. This country is fast becoming a nation of pussies belly aching about every little thing. For the record, I shoveled my walk, not because I was worried about some bone head walking down the side walk in 10 degree weather, but because I didn't want to be beaten down and flogged by the code inspector. I don't know how we ever made it with out shoveled sidewalks. What a stupid law.

0

Helen Pendleton Rumbaut 3 years, 8 months ago

And I thought liberal Austin's ordinances were getting way too intrusive...

0

Martha Oldham 3 years, 8 months ago

What i hate is people who turn in their neighbors to the city people for fun.

0

John Reher 3 years, 8 months ago

They can start fining people as soon as the streets are cleared and their own sidewalks and crossings are clear. That should be about April by my count.

0

Carol Bowen 3 years, 8 months ago

Sidewalks adjacent to commercial, industrial, and activity centers like the schools should be shoveled. The fines should be high enough to influence them, or better yet, the city should send out contractors and bill the business. (Stimulate the local economy.) I find it incredible that businesses would not clear the way to their doors.

Clearing sidewalks is a community responsibility. Like Moderate says, we should either shovel ourselves or pay to have it done. And, please quit making claims about disabled folks not able to shovel snow unless you are disabled.

0

hail2oldku 3 years, 8 months ago

Sorry if it has already been posted, but whatever the city decides is an adequate fine for a residential property should be multiplied by at least 5 for commercial properties.

0

Linda Aikins 3 years, 8 months ago

hey KU Rowing Team - here's a moneymaking opportunity that will work those upper bodies! Wouldn't it beat yard work?

0

HW 3 years, 8 months ago

Is the city exempt from this requirement? For those of you who don't agree with the ordinance, I suggest you take note of every city sidewalk you see that is not shoveled, and bombard the code enforcement office with them. I imagine 400-500 extra complaints (which, if I am not mistaken, are required to be investigated) per storm would cramp their style a bit.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.