Previous Next
How much should the fine be for not wearing your seat belt?
Asked at Massachusetts Street on August 11, 2010
“Maybe $75 because I think there should be a stricter consequence for that action.”
“One hundred dollars, something that might actually make you put your seat belt on. Five dollars is not a big enough threat, it’s chump change.”
“I don’t think there should probably be a fine. I think that it’s up to people to handle their own safety. I know that there are some situations where a seat belt can create a problem for some people.”
“The fine could be as much as it can be because I wear my seat belt every time. But in my opinion, the higher the fine, the more likely people are going to wear a seat belt.”
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- City approves Menards store next to Home Depot at 31st and Iowa streets June 18, 2013 · 6 comments
- Kobach considering filing charges against protesters who came to his home June 17, 2013 · 109 comments
- Opinion: Redskins mascot can’t be justified June 16, 2013 · 96 comments
- Residents irate over quarry blasting June 18, 2013 · 11 comments
- Blog: State seeking proposal to develop resort at Clinton Lake State Park June 18, 2013 · 20 comments
- U.S. Supreme Court strikes down voter registration law similar to the one in Kansas June 17, 2013 · 75 comments
- Blog: City commissioners now will consider 700 block of Vermont as home for downtown transit hub June 18, 2013 · 17 comments
- Kansas Board of Regents to vote on proposed tuition, fee increases June 18, 2013 · 10 comments
- Letter: Energy folly June 15, 2013 · 41 comments
- City commissioners to consider final approvals for Menards project June 14, 2013 · 83 comments
- Freshman Frankamp brings hot shot to KU June 18, 2013
- Clinton Lake resort discussions resurface September 6, 2012
- Report says schools underfunded $657 million in FY 2015 June 17, 2013
- New TV deal expands KU athletics coverage, access June 18, 2013
- Residents irate over quarry blasting June 18, 2013
- Lawrence man sentenced to 52 months in prison for February bank robbery June 18, 2013
- Regents to consider bonds for new engineering building June 18, 2013
- Free State’s Dieker, Hodison first-team all-league soccer June 4, 2013
- KU grad student wins national fellowship to help young kids deal with intense stress June 13, 2013
- KU dean blasts negative national report on teacher preparation programs June 18, 2013



Comments
AreUNorml 2 years, 10 months ago
after 38 years, I've finally started wearing mine. no, I don't feel safer; I feel confined and restricted. I don't really like it. But an old timer once told me "boy, don't you go around breaking more than one law at a time!" So, since I'm usually breaking one, I can't risk being pulled over for a really stupid one.
jonas_opines 2 years, 10 months ago
One hour watching videos of fatal car crashes with your eyes taped open a la Clockwork Orange.
Here's a curiosity question. For those who support letting people make their own decision in the matter (a group I happen to subscribe to), what about the kids in the car too young to make their own decisions? Whatever the decision of the adults, it seems kind of like child abuse to not make kids buckle up, sort of. Whatcha think?
gogoplata 2 years, 10 months ago
Children belong to their parents, not the state. Letting your kid ride in a car without a seatbelt is not child abuse. How many people grew up riding in cars without a seatbelt? I did and I can tell you it is not child abuse. There are just way too many people that like to tell other people how to live their lives. Screw that, I say live and let live.
LoveThsLife 2 years, 10 months ago
As parents our kids do not 'belong' to us like property. We can't do with them as we wish...that is ridiculous! We have responsibility towards them to keep them safe and care for them. They are people too..even if they are small and can't communicate like an adult. They deserve our thoughtfulness and respect. Respect towards their personal safety and well being.
gogoplata 2 years, 10 months ago
Children belong to their parents until they are old enough to take care of themselves. I never said we could do with them as we wish. I said letting a kid ride in a car without a seatbelt is not child abuse. Besides the 1st and retarted 2nd line of your post I agree with you.
LoveThsLife 2 years, 10 months ago
It's called stewardship not ownership and there is a difference.
gogoplata 2 years, 10 months ago
I agree stewardship is a better word. So I would say that the parents are the stewards of their own children not the state. Parents then can decide to put their own children in seatbelts or not.
jonas_opines 2 years, 10 months ago
So, if you don't have your kids wearing a seatbelt and you get into a wreck and all of your kids die, do you bear any culpability towards their deaths?
GardenMomma 2 years, 10 months ago
Yes.
If you are driving recklessly (say, drunk or speeding) and you get into a wreck and kill someone you do "bear culpability towards their deaths"
Why? Because there's a law against driving drunk or over the speed limit just as there's a law to wear your seatbelt.
gogoplata 2 years, 10 months ago
Depends on how you were driving.
emaw 2 years, 10 months ago
Next thing you know they are going to be fining people for not wearing condoms!!!!
AreUNorml 2 years, 10 months ago
I'm kinda for this. first they would administer an IQ test, based on those results, check for condom usage.
RETICENT_IRREVERENT 2 years, 10 months ago
The same as the fine for not carrying your sidearm.
consumer1 2 years, 10 months ago
Grant is simply abiding by a new law initiated by the squeaky left. All pedestrians must wear helmets while walking.
JJE007 2 years, 10 months ago
Fine? It should be...um...nothing(?), unless you are injured in a car wreck (your fault or "theirs"). Then the insurance companies of those involved should be free to dismiss all of your claims. ...tough love...tough love... Ohhh... forget it. It's too tough to play GAWD or 3B-PO (Benificent Big Brutha-Police Officer).
snap_pop_no_crackle 2 years, 10 months ago
Get video of that!
RETICENT_IRREVERENT 2 years, 10 months ago
Steven Slater would never pay a seatbelt fine.
RETICENT_IRREVERENT 2 years, 10 months ago
No autie, See this is why I respect the hell out of the gays. Because they're not afraid to get flamboyant on you. They understand that you can never be too over the top. That you always got to always leave the crowd wanting more. Like a straight dude probably just grabs the intercom and swears at a dude and then gets fired.. But not a gay dude. He grabs two beers, parachute slides it out of there with his hair blowing in the wind just leaving everybody breathless on the scene. And when the cops arrive at his house in to arrest him, he's making Awesome Sauce McCoy with his main man! That's the mark of a true entertainer. Just a virtuoso performance on how to quit your job. Somewhere Liberace is smiling.
calwt262 2 years, 10 months ago
Grant looks like a complete tool wearing a decorative foam cooler on his head.
Also, someone needs to tell Grant that riding a bicycle on the sidewalk downtown carries with it a $30.00 fine. Worse yet, sporting a scraggily chin-strap beard with the mustache intentially shaved off carries with it a $200.00 fine and a mandatory 30 days of being clean shaven with a single blade disposable bic razor and barbasol shaving cream.
CWGOKU 2 years, 10 months ago
I agree with Autie on the seatbelt thing. I'd go with something other than the M-16, rounds are too small, don't cause enough damage.
T_O_B, you are on a roll today, don't stop. Thank you all for a fun morning.
CrazyUkrainian1 2 years, 10 months ago
Embrace Life - always wear your seat belt by SussexSaferRoads
krich 2 years, 10 months ago
Here's the deal Jason. You don't wear the belt and if you are injured in a traffic accident, you are barred from making an injury claim. When you don't mitigate your damages, you lose! Fair enough?
RETICENT_IRREVERENT 2 years, 10 months ago
The government has no business legislating responsibility.
dabbindan 2 years, 10 months ago
what do you think car insurance is? legislated responsibility.
rumor_man 2 years, 10 months ago
I only wear mine when I have an open container....so as to offset the fines.
puddleglum 2 years, 10 months ago
I have had several close encounters with sean penn....one was playing pool. i can't describe what happened because it is so inappropriate, but you guys are on the right track.
CWGOKU 2 years, 10 months ago
And he is not as handsom as you
puddleglum 2 years, 10 months ago
yall got that right!!
mr_right_wing 2 years, 10 months ago
The consequence is worse injuries than if you were wearing a seat belt and a greater possibility of death.
Good enough motivation for me!
Vince & Larry taught me well as a kid ("You could learn a lot from a dummy!")
Did_I_say_that 2 years, 10 months ago
http://www.threadless.com/crit/big/114394.jpg
sunshine_noise 2 years, 10 months ago
Its $200 in MD and you bet people wear them, except for the idiots who think they are invincable and will never get into a car wreck. Even going 30 miles and hitting something without a seatbelt you can obtain a serious injury then if wearing a belt. Maybe there should be a test site where people who don't believe can test how much impact can cause damage. You'd think they get it then? They woman with the 3 children a couple weeks ago was not wearing a seat belt and none of the children were in restraints and all 3 died. How so very sad and she could have possibly avoided their death had they been in proper restraints. I don't know how the woman is now...anyone?
dabbindan 2 years, 10 months ago
i'll bet part of her wishes she was........
amesn 2 years, 10 months ago
4 weeks ago this Friday a seatbelt saved my life after my vehicle rolled several times..surely without it I would have been ejected and killed or at least paralyzed. I believe its a choice but i'm sold!
dabbindan 2 years, 10 months ago
it just got put in place. leave it where it is for a couple years. it'll give the public a chance to get accustomed to it. increase it too soon and you'll get a backlash and compliance will go down because people will see it as exploitative.
gccs14r 2 years, 10 months ago
Make the fine income-dependent and start it at two weeks gross pay, with a second offense in five years a suspended license and a trebled fine (six weeks pay) and the third offense in five years a revoked license and a trebling of the second fine (18 weeks pay). Oh, and make the fine per offender, so if you have seven people aboard and none of them are wearing a seatbelt, the fine starts at 14 weeks pay. If there are more people aboard than there are seatbelts available, make the fine $10,000 per unbelted passenger in addition to the unbelted occupant fine. Post giant signs at every border crossing with a second giant warning one mile in from the border and signs at every highway junction so folks passing through definitely get the message. Then enforce it with no plea-bargaining.
gccs14r 2 years, 10 months ago
Here's a recent speeding fine that would get someone's attention:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1302161/Speeding-Swede-clocks-worlds-biggest-motoring-fine-180mph-chase.html
kansasmutt 2 years, 10 months ago
$0.00 is just fine. The law is BS. if you ride with someone and you dont trust the way they drive, buckle up. This is as bad as telling us to wear bots while driving instead of tennis shoes, its BS. The law is bogus.
GardenMomma 2 years, 10 months ago
What if you trust the person driving and you still end up in an accident? Wearing a seatbelt can protect you from serious injury.
If you "choose" not to wear your seatbelt and you're in an accident, can I "choose" not to pay for the first responders and other expenses that you incur that are covered by taxpayer support (like the police, 911 dispatchers, etc.)
gogoplata 2 years, 10 months ago
The police and 911 dispatchers are going to repond to an accident. It doesn't matter if you were wearing a seatbelt or not.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.